Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Litigation coming up

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Litigation coming up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2012, 04:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Litigation coming up

Beware to that person who posted on social media, you can run but cannot hide:

Quote:Cause damage to company's or person's reputation and defamatory, slanderous remarks BROADCASTED/PUBLISHED online i.e FACEBOOK.TWITTER.
wongsuzie is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2012, 09:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
litigation

Okay, i'll bite. saw the 'reminder' on IntraCX from the Personnel Dept. which means someone prob. messed up again. in a generic nutshell, what was said/transmitted? sounds serious. even the PPRuNe administrators' reminder (above) "...won't guarantee anonymity!"

Oh, and if it's about the Thai F/A's "coffee threat" on Thaksin's daughter on board then disregard. *yawn*

Last edited by alohajec; 3rd Dec 2012 at 10:03.
alohajec is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 00:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People can be sued for implied slander. Beware. Prune won't protect u if you've skirted close to the edge. You better have proof. Or you had better shut up
Tornado Ali is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 00:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't the word "rumour" imply unsubstantiated? Why anyone would take anything mentioned on this site too seriously is beyond me.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 01:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point. Personal agendas and anonymous slander is all pretty sad when u get down to it
Trafalgar is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 02:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Earth
Age: 32
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty difficult to justify a lawsuit unless the individual or company involved has assets that can be pursued as damages. If you were on the board, would you put your lawyers to work on tedious issues that end in no financial recourse? Perhaps it's the fundamentals of the issues that should be targeted to eliminate future problems that cause negative publicity.
Maid Day is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.