Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

(Cathay)Airline passengers unloaded after 11 hours waiting on JFK tarmac

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

(Cathay)Airline passengers unloaded after 11 hours waiting on JFK tarmac

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Dec 2010, 02:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: North America
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(Cathay)Airline passengers unloaded after 11 hours waiting on JFK tarmac

CNN had a 5 min piece on this...
11 hrs after landing at JFK from YVR, 0200- 1300 on the airplane... what if the crew declares a mayday due to a Riot in the Cabin.

CNN.com Search

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - Airline passengers unloaded after 11 hours waiting on JFK tarmac - CNN.com Blogs

Click on all the Links including the story on BA pax talking about only 3 Customs officers available to CX and BA's 600 plus pax after finally getting off...Good Job WTF is going on with these airports.

CX spokesman very political (almost CYA in tone) ... " no good pointing fingers..."

Pax Bill of rights only applies to Domestic flights

Last edited by Grinch; 29th Dec 2010 at 02:50.
Grinch is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 02:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Serves 'em right.
Serious air travelers avoid JFK like the plague.
411A is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 14:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No where
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The most hilarious comment so far on this is this one from a Port Authority spokesman:

It is an airline’s responsibility to make sure before they leave their point of origin to make sure that they have a gate assignment,” said Steve Coleman, a Port Authority spokesman. “These airlines did not. So they got to the airport and had no place to dock.”

So let me get this straight: an airline contracts with an airport to lease gates, gates they use every day of the week at approximately the same time of day. You show up at the airport, after a 15 hr flight, expecting to use said gate, and a moron at the airport authority then states you are supposed to check BEFORE you leave HK if you have a gate or not....???? Hello....am i missing something here? This is yet another example of just how incredibly pathetic the USA is becoming, at just about every level. Makes Uganda in the 70's look good....
Air Profit is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is yet another example of just how incredibly pathetic the USA is becoming, at just about every level.
It's all quite simple, don't come here if you don't like it....in fact, Air Profit, we don't want you here, anyway.

Now, looking at the JFK situation just slightly more objectively, the period in question found about two feet of snow dumped on JFK and surrounding areas in a twenty four hour period...and the airport was kept open, nevertheless.
Whereas, just a short time ago, four inches of snow closed LHR for two days. Totally closed, no movements at all.
And, the CX flight deck crew in question were not-so-smart, either, as this heavy snowfall was well predicted.
Perhaps...CX crews just don't bother to look at the weather forecasts.

Last edited by 411A; 29th Dec 2010 at 15:22.
411A is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No where
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UK is a creaky country with poor infrastructure....but the people know it and constantly rail against the government to improve things.

The US is a creaky country with poor infrastructure....but on the whole all you hear is 'my country, right or wrong'...... Well, the last few years...it's mainly wrong. Just look at your home value in Fountain Hills......sure you're really happy with that economic fact?
Air Profit is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No where
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A question does come to mind: If the conditions were so bad at JFK, and gates were not going to be available, why would the CX ground staff not have told HK this fact and have the aircraft diverted...? Does seem as though the infamous chinese inability towards 'lateral thinking' has come back to bite...
Air Profit is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: home
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that going to JFK, and waiting on the ground for 11 hours, was the best of a lot of bad options. Both for Cathay, and the passengers.

Should they have diverted, CX would have had to pay for a lot of hotel rooms, and then had FDP, crewing, and a lot of other issues. Even at an online port.

And if they diverted, I guarantee that these passengers would have had to wait a lot longer than 11 hours to get to JFK. I would have been days.
third floor whore is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: No where
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...good point (all's forgiven...! )
Air Profit is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 16:13
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep in mind that the Port Authority has the responsibility to get the runways and taxiways cleared and accessible for arriving/departing flights. The individual airlines have the responsibility for their respective ramp areas. Once the Port declared the airport "OPEN", that means the airport can land/takeoff aircraft....Period! Parking, immigration, customs, baggage handlers, gate agents, etc....., have NO bearing on whether to call the airport OPEN or not. The responsibility falls squarely on the airlines and in particular the STATION MANAGER!! You would think that the respective station manager would have a simple checklist....
Gate Area: Clear and available Check
Baggage Handlers: Available Check
Customs/Immigration: Available Check
Ground Staff: Available Check
.
If any/all of these required parties are not ready, then pick up the phone and instruct IOC not to depart any flts for JFK until these required services are back in operation. The station manager is on site and is the best person to make that call....heck, it's their job!! It is a tough call on a flight en-route, but launching already diverted flights from YYZ to JFK without the ability to park and handle the pax is absurd. The station manager in JFK has some explaining to do.
BeefReefFlyer is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 16:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Pole
Age: 93
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For what its worth, I just heard a CX spokesman on the radio admitting that they restarted operations too early and that this contributed to the delays on the ground.

Also, am I going colour blind or some of those image verification thingies impossible to read?
MrClaus is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 17:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, am I going colour blind or some of those image verification thingies impossible to read?
Some are, yes so....select another one.
411A is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 05:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is a thought

okay so the whole fiasco was a total mess .

Yes Cathay has a gate allocation but the flight arrived late, very late, so it would have been prudent to check the availability of gates, ramp handling staff, remembering that a lot of them would have been unable to get to work due to the driving conditions. Refuellers and most importantly the availability of de icing fluid.
This is not the first time that Cathay have launched aircraft into blizzards in NA and I'm sure that it won't be the last . IOC have a massive resistance to canceling flights. There is an attitude of, go at all costs, and the crew can sort it out when they get there.
Surely When all of the NA airlines are canceling flights the sensible thing to do is to heed their judgement and do the same thing, after all it is their backyard.
I have to ask, have any of the IOC staff ever seen snow or have any idea of the difficulties of operating an aircraft in such bad weather conditions? I guess not, and none of the senior managers will be sent to the gulag for retraining following this mess. So it begs the question who was ultimately responsible for dispatching the aircraft in the first instance????

Why were the passengers not allowed to disembark using steps and then be bussed to the terminal ? What would the port authority have done if there had been a medical case on board ? Genuine or invented .

The whole episode was a complete disgrace and Cathay deserves all the bad press it got, as does the port authority for not passing information to the airlines that use JFK, informing them not to launch into JFK without ensuring that they could disembark passengers or that gates were available.
Having said that the PA of NY showed no lateral thinking ,when aircraft arrived full of passengers , in coming up with an alternative plan to get those passengers off the aircraft.

Isn't there legislation in place to fine the airlines for keeping passengers hostage on the ground for more than 2 hours and shouldn't the passengers now be free to sue the PA for doing the same thing????
joblow is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 09:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TFW - Pull your head in

To TFW - you sound like an absolute suck. Appropriate handle. Yes - let's leave to the Line crews to deal with it. Why have an IOC and all and sundry - I bet the crew contacted them and they had either nothing to offer or said continue.

CX the mantra is to let the front line crews deal with the iorate pax caused by poor pro-active planning and operations by the 'back office'.

Happy new Year and get the brown off your tongues, and see it for what it is!
carl baker is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 13:05
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At JFK the Port Authority does not control the allocation of gates. In Cathay's case it is controled by BA, because they utilize terminal 7 which is run by BA.

Cathay brought in 4 777-300's during the first 6 hours of operations after the blizzard. The unforseen event was the ramp employees were not able to get to JFK due to the lack of mass transit, and the rampers were not going to spend $30 to $50 to come to work by cab. This lack of employees ground the already challenging operation to a halt.

If the crews experienced any emergency situations that required deplaning of passengers by stairs in a remote location that option was available and was not utilized.

Before any questions of my information:

I work at JFK and was there on the nights in question.
HM79 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 15:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JFK Blizzard

I operated into JFK right after a blizzard last year. We parked at Terminal 5, since Terminal 7 was full. I wonder how the ASM managed this last year, but this year no such love?
Goldeye is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 02:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unforseen Issues

HM 79

Thanks for the information , it just backs up my argument that there was no apparent thought put into the cx operation following the blizzard . Who in their right mind launches 4 777's into an airport that has just suffered a devestating snow storm . Why wasn't the lack of staff or employees considered.? It was pretty obvious to anyone with a TV that road transportation was going to be a major issue .
So, we dump all of those passengers in NY, just how were they supposed to get to their ultimate destination ? Most of the transportation network in NY was at a standstill following the blizzard and I would venture a guess that hotel rooms were in critically short supply as well

Personally I think that 11 hours stuck on an aircraft after landing constitutes an emergency. Just a point of interest ,Did any of the crews ask to deplane the passengers at a remote bay? and if so what was the PA of NY response,
joblow is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 04:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
,Did any of the crews ask to deplane the passengers at a remote bay? and if so what was the PA of NY response
It makes no difference whether they asked the Port Authority, or not.
US Customs and Immigration calls the shots with arriving international flights, at all US landing rights airports.
If ICE says...stay on board...pax stay on board.
No exception, except in case of dire medical emergency.
411A is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 04:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, we dump all of those passengers in NY, just how were they supposed to get to their ultimate destination ? Most of the transportation network in NY was at a standstill following the blizzard and I would venture a guess that hotel rooms were in critically short supply as well
I am sure that CX couldn't care less about that. Once the passengers are off the plane at their destination then who cares what happens to them!
geh065 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 12:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...Another Anderson Cooper story, a chap who has too much sail for his hull.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2011, 18:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: home
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Carl.

Given that the flight departed Hong Kong before the situation at JFK became apparent, what would you have done.?

See if you can come up with one option that would have resulted in less delay for the passengers, and less cost for the company.

Sorry to bust your dreams, but Cathay are not in this game to make things easier for the line crews. I dont like it, but bitching about it wont change the fact.

If you are talking about the safety issue of landing in marginal weather, then that was a question for the crew on the day.
third floor whore is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.