Avoiding / Reducing EFP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western Hemisphere
Age: 41
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Avoiding / Reducing EFP
The Rostering Practices and OPS Manual states:
"18.1 Published Rosters will not be changed for the sole purpose of avoiding or reducing EFP."
But then theres an internal vacancy on IntraCX for ICM Executive - Crew Control, FOP which states one of the Key Responsibilities:
"Cross checking and adjusting crew rosters to ensure overtime payment of CX/KA/LD crew can be minimised."
So if you ever thought, "I wonder why that sector was changed to PX", now you know.
"18.1 Published Rosters will not be changed for the sole purpose of avoiding or reducing EFP."
But then theres an internal vacancy on IntraCX for ICM Executive - Crew Control, FOP which states one of the Key Responsibilities:
"Cross checking and adjusting crew rosters to ensure overtime payment of CX/KA/LD crew can be minimised."
So if you ever thought, "I wonder why that sector was changed to PX", now you know.
Last edited by Waterskier; 15th Jul 2010 at 11:39.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting, but nothing new here. How many of us on overtime have had trips taken away for one reason or another to keep us under 84hrs. This has been happening for years, just like the blatent abuse of O days.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Simple... give PX duty full credit... it's the only way to stop them manipulating the system unfairly and start rostering responsibly
