Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Cabin Crew Shafted

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Cabin Crew Shafted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Mar 2010, 03:43
  #1 (permalink)  
crwjerk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cabin Crew Shafted

CX " Hourly " cabin crew have just had their swap policy changed so that they will not be able to swap to reduce their Flying hours Below the Minimum 70 hours that they are paid for. Another morale boosting move invented by a bean counter.
Do the pilots have to " watch this space?"
 
Old 17th Mar 2010, 04:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX has suspended the implementation of new swapping guidelines for cabin
crew.

The company backed down due to massive complaints from Cabin Crew.

Stand together for something you believe in and results can be achieved. Lets see the same drive from the AOA & the pilot body...
Harbour Dweller is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 05:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MARS
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the meantime, let me repeat that the new guidelines were designed simply to close a loophole that had resulted in a growing number of crew swapping below the 70 hour minimum guarantee.
Yeah right! What this slimeball is actually trying to say is that the savings would have earned him a HUGE bonus...while he watched as our boys and girls earning peanuts already would be screwed over even more

A nice "thank you" from management for helping the company out when the sky was falling last year, what a bunch a spineless snakes!

Good on the cabin crew for threatening a "strike over Easter as a last resort" as per the article in the SCMP today!
AD POSSE AD ESSE is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 06:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lion rock bottom
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kudos to the cabin crew!

Seems we could learn a thing or two from them in terms of dealing with management...
Ex Cathedra is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 07:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do the pilots have to " watch this space?"
The contracts are very different. Cx doesn't want to pay extra. I don't think we need to worry about it.
hongkongpilot is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 05:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moral of the story is to get the cabin crew to fight our battles for us!! The only way we'll win...
geh065 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 23:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hong K ong
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes they can certainly be of help.

SCMP
Cathay reconsiders attendant swap rule

Cathay Pacific Airways (SEHK: 0293) has suspended a policy restricting the swapping of shifts by flight attendants. The airline said the decision, coming a day after the attendants' union threatened industrial action, was made because it did not want to disrupt the lifestyle of its crew. The policy would have required attendants to work at least 70 hours a month before swapping with colleagues. Austin Chiu

We need to hire one of them to help us. Or be very nice to them and they can threaten CX for our benefit at times. etc...

Anyway well done to them.
You got to nip things in the butt straightaway, unlike us!
crewsunite is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 02:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done the Cabin Crew, and their union.
They could certainly show us pilots and our union a thing or two.
I seem to remember not long ago being polled by the AOA as to whether we thought the unions should merge, or at least work more closely together....AOA, DPA and FAU. As usual, it was just a poll, nothing at all was ever heard after or ever came of it.
Anyway, good to see at least the CC can stand up for their rights against the school bully. We never will.
The Wraith is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 07:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: home
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We will not be held at ransom.

To My Bonus.

The Management.
The Management is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 12:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Management,
I hear that cash is king when it comes to not being someone's BIATCH in the slammer! You might want to save some of that bonus up!!!!
The Wraith is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 13:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corrigendum

Mr Management,
:...held to ransom."
English is not your strong suit, eh?
Are you by chance from the Antipodes, or, even worse, one of the older colonies?

Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 13:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Miffed at being an online internet comedy ....
Age: 69
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deluded Imbeciles

You're quite correct Neptunes Rex, the biggest deluded imbeciles are from down under ....

ME!

Last edited by Capt Toss Parker; 19th Mar 2010 at 14:34.
Capt Toss Parker is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2010, 14:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I missing something?

Tell me if I am missing anything, but the company asking CC to work actual hours they are contracted to before swapping to possibly reduce hours, but not below what they will get paid for....this would seem reasonable. The company I work for requires that I work the full 43 hours per week, yes, per week, not 70 per month. You do the math! What is wrong with a business expecting an employee to actually work for their salary?? In the press cuttings I have seen, it would appear that some unscrupulous crew are swapping regularly to get paid for hours NOT worked. In the real world they would be sacked.
BlueEng is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 00:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blue Eng

Ahhh, Envy...one of the seven deadly sins.

Your response is typical of those who know little, or nothing, of aviation.

The 70 hours worked are flying hours. Factor in another 150 hours for various other time consuming aspects of the job such as admin days, office days, days and nights spent jet-lagged in a hotel room on the other side of the world, eighteen hours minimum rest in a 10 foot by 10 foot cubicle (I mean hotel room) before climbing back on board. Then days spent, back at home, jet-lagged, recovering from, yet another, seemingly endless, flight to the other side of the planet....and you'll find flight crew work far more hours, and spend far more time away from their homes and families than people like you who live in the "real-world" (9 to 5, home every weekend , as well as several hundred official Hong Kong statutory holidays off as well!).

Tell us Blue Eng, what's it feel like to walk around alert and fully rested? What's it feel like to be home every night with your family, or to be able to plan, with certainty, family activities on all those long weekends.....

What’s it feel like to work only 40 hours a week!!!

Last edited by raven11; 21st Mar 2010 at 01:10.
raven11 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 01:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Gate 69
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And lets not forget great duties like the MNL or TPE Split. What is it, 13-14 hours duty, for less than 4 hours of flying? We really should be paid something for the duty period as well. And don't get me started on unpaid reserve!

The main problem I see is, other than cabin crew at simply not paid enough for what they have to do and put up with, is the fact that they have no "lifestyle" choices. They can not request flights (unless they get their one joker request by not calling in sick for the whole year). They can not choose between "compact" and "super compact". They can't even nominate if they want to do heaps of day flights (to allow them to be home with their young children), or lots of longer layovers (so they get more days off afterwards to commute). Not that there are many decent layovers as the base crews see to those (BKK crew doing MEL flights even).

So I completely understand why they are so angry. Wouldn't you be?
Near Miss is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 04:05
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Hours is NOT equal to Duty Hours. The media has been cleverly exploiting this by publishing numbers that bewilder the ignorant (which unfortunately are the great majority of public) all the time. My own circle of friends use to think it's atrocious that we are that "highly" paid based on the contractual hours that we work.. Till you list all the sacrifices and stresses that they never thought of, and the one thing that I always try to highlight, would be the above fact and we DO NOT work 2 1/2 hours a day on average!!
Management should be graceful enough to know that swaps and flight changes done individually are for good reason. Lowering of one's hours mean upping of another. What's wrong with that if workload is shared willingly, and employees are happy? Well I guess the latter is something that irks the bean counters too much, and I too have forgotten that graciousness is only an academic word during management courses.
Good job there CX cabin crew, proud of you to say the least.
cpt777 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 04:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess what they will say: ''hey that's the deal worker bees, can't hack it? 10000 ppl waiting to join!''

at half the cost too..
wongsuzie is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 05:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CC shafted?? All these words of support....

Oops, slipped into the wrong thread - thought this was about the BA CC
makintw is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 10:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were sucessful and avoided the shafting because they are a Union. Which is more than can be said for the AOA.
Slayed is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2010, 12:21
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember when you see the abbreviation AOA substitute it with Pilots of Cathay Pacific
SMOC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.