Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

A380 Rumour ????

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

A380 Rumour ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th October 2009 | 05:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: VHHH
A380 Rumour ????

Heard today another A380 rumour.

6*A380 ex Emirates plus simulator. To be announced next week?

Looking forward to any rumours - true or false
CokeZero is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 06:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
Spoke to one of the managers recently, no A380's, but "another aircraft type" will be ordered shortly. A350's anyone?
C172Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 07:33
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
Likes: 5
From: asia
747-800i ??
buggaluggs is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 08:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: under a rock
777-300er?
bubble.head is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 08:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Heard that it will not be either the A380 or 747-8i, and will be something we do not currently operate. That only really leaves the A350 or a fleet of Cessna208s on floats.

Having said that, given the secrecy of aircraft orders in the past up to the day or two before any announcement, I would not be holding my breath! I don't see how any manager can say with certainly that we will be ordering one thing over another unless it is the guys in aircraft purchasing or doing the finance.
geh065 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 09:58
  #6 (permalink)  
crwjerk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, what did i hear........
I heard it may be A350's or A380's
Will be getting rid of 777's.
 
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 10:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 2
From: 3.5 from TD
No reason to announce an order now, boys. If they did that before the end of the year, it would be very hard to convince the troops that they don't have the money for 13th month yet they have it for some shiny new jets.

If anything is in the works, it will be announced next year.
Sqwak7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 11:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: mars
cant exactly announce new orders when the sky is falling, financial crisis, SLS etc. As Sqwak says, with 13th month around the corner and aircraft sitting in the parking lot. Maybe a couple more rounds of SLS will foot the bill.... share the pain
Humber10 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 13:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
From: No where
I think the phrase 'over my dead body' and a further SLS round could be placed in the same sentence...
Air Profit is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 18:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
I'm surprised the 787 hasn't been rumored. Or has the company publicly stated that the 787 won't fit in the operation?
sioux115 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 19:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, Ireland
Probably considered a bit small for CX; the 789 is "only" around the same size as the 330 and the 787-10 hasn't been launched yet; the 350, on the other hand, offers plenty of growth opportunities, as well as a potential 773/77W replacement down the road (350-1000).

Of course, you can be sure that Airbus sees CX as a potential 388 customer, so they will do all they can do reel them on that front as well.
akerosid is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 00:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
787 'Dreamliner' (same dream/same team!) was considered but unfortunately it was determined that in 36 degree temperatures and humidity above 76% fuselage panels would fall off.

Additionally the rough nature of the runway surface of 07L in HKG would have caused serious cracking at the wing root leading to structural failure within 6 months.

RFP for Sonic Cruiser?
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 12:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: disco bay
787 'Dreamliner' (same dream/same team!) was considered but unfortunately it was determined that in 36 degree temperatures and humidity above 76% fuselage panels would fall off.

Additionally the rough nature of the runway surface of 07L in HKG would have caused serious cracking at the wing root leading to structural failure within 6 months.
determined by who? sounds highly unlikely. any chance of a web reference or is this just a rumour?
captncannot is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 13:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 1
From: crewbag
determined by who? sounds highly unlikely. any chance of a web reference or is this just a rumour?
I bet you're a hoot at parties. Don't fancy Monthy Python much, huh?
quadspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2009 | 00:18
  #15 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide
Tell 'em they're dreamin
SeldomFixit is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2009 | 04:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: up here, everyone looks like ants!
Tell 'em they're dreamin
Same Team...

Same Dream!!

Cpt. Underpants is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2009 | 10:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: disco bay
I bet you're a hoot at parties. Don't fancy Monthy Python much, huh?
I've no idea what you're on about Quad, I try and avoid parties where the jokes are about aeroplanes
captncannot is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2009 | 01:55
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 1
From: crewbag
I've no idea what you're on about Quad,
He was being sarcastic, captncannot.

A. Le Rhone, in his PPRuNe posting on the 17th of November regarding the structural integrity of the 787, used perception and cleverly apt expression to make a sarcastic remark.

But a knack for sarcasm isn't necessarily linked to intelligence. Some highly intelligent people who have autism or Asperger's syndrome, for example, may fail to understand jokes and sarcasm. But generally speaking, people who are particularly good at detecting sarcasm also tend to be better at identifying emotional facial expressions. They seem to understand social situations better overall. Hence the reference to parties and the hoot.

Monty Python is generally know to tackle death, sex, religion, war, and more with heavy doses of satire and sarcasm. Hence it got included as well.
quadspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2009 | 10:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: disco bay
a knack for sarcasm isn't necessarily linked to intelligence.
I quite agree. I wasn't having a dig at le Rhone, genuinely curious, which is why my post ended with a question.
captncannot is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2009 | 12:01
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
As far as I can tell, the only way we'll know which particular type we're getting is when the management categorically deny we're getting it. Only then can we be assured it's on the way.

STP
Steve the Pirate is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.