Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

777 Jnb ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Sep 2009, 07:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
777 Jnb ?

It looks like the 777 isn't doing JNB this winter, is this right?
Rook is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 08:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Winter here means summer down there!!

Too hot for the ER to lift any decent payload without having to go via BKK.

It's ok up to about 22c then it gets interesting........
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 12:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In front of the PC
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
temp bases being offered for 744, so probably answers your question
asianeagle is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 12:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South of 60
Age: 60
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, just can't help but asking, above 22C makes life "interesting" for something like a T7ER???
Joker's Wild is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 13:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Twins have lots of extra performance compared to quads, until one of the engines stops.

Hence at hot/high airports take off weight may have to be limited to leave sufficient performance on one engine.

Basically that means payload (and subload passengers) left behind, or less fuel carried and a tech stop (BKK) on the way home.

Jo's is 5500 feet above mean sea level, and with (southern hemisphere) summer temperatures it can become quite limiting for twin operations. From what I hear the 340-300 wasn't much better!
jonathon68 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 18:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the other hand 77W is replacing 744 on the second daily LAX flight for the winter.
B-HKD is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 22:35
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great, more LAX hotel.

hopefully 777 starts something Europe as the planes roll in next year.
Rook is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2009, 01:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South of 60
Age: 60
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jonathon68

Thanks for that, 5500 amsl will certainly do it, was unaware JNB sat that high.

Cheers,

JW
Joker's Wild is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2009, 05:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently 6 fewer 777s as the company is leasing them back to someone? I think I read that correctly on the news update about HAECO? Someone please tell me if I'm wrong.
boxjockey is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2009, 09:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are wrong. It was a sale and leaseback deal.
BusyB is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2009, 10:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
swire did get their HAECO shares below market value though.... but cx needed the cash.
Humber10 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 10:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: hong kong
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my suggestion
Hong kong - JNB- CAPETOWN - stop in for some with my brewskis with my boets - AND THEN ON TO HKG ! then we can lift as much as we want to !
LOL , get me that job in planning
goathead is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 10:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Line Ops and Airline Planning have crunched the numbers doing exactly that, it didn't make enough money to make it worthwhile I'm told.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 13:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"enough money" being the all-too common key point. Cathay don't seem to start any new route until they can make bucket loads.
geh065 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 16:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: CGK to HKG
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Jo's is 5500 feet above mean sea level, and with (southern hemisphere) summer temperatures it can become quite limiting for twin operations.
From what I hear the 340-300 wasn't much better!

Jon68, the 340-300 aircraft with hairdryers were so poor that during the J'burg summer B744 aircraft had to be used. The CFM56 things were frequently limited on EGT margin and hitting 950 - 960'C during t/off. Such that MC had all these engines on watch to keep the worst aircraft off this route until a core wash could be done to attempt to regain some margin. A battle never lost he said!
Tinwacker is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 19:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus bashing again

The 340 did well on the JHB route operating in the hottest months. True Maintenance procedures suggested by CFMI were in place to assist the operation but that is what maintenance should be able to do
HKJunkie is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 21:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,853
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts
Cooda, shooda, wooda...kept the A340-600's to operate JNB all year round, with based Jaapies to operate them (who'll fly for food).
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 23:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HKJunkie

Are you suggesting the A340 was operated all year round to JNB? I’ve been here a while now and on the bus the whole time and don’t recall it doing that.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 02:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Retired-ville
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
404titan, your memory does not fail you.
The route was initially flown only by the -400 from about 1991.
Later in the 90's, the scarebus was put on during the 'cool' season.
The periods HK junkie may be refering to are possibly the month before or just after the changover. Indeed these months could be hot, and departures were often 'interesting'.
The extrapolation of quickly rising temperatures to guestimate RTOW coupled with the anticipated changes in wind for sched dep time, were things you didnt want to get wrong, as the TO was often at a realistic max weight.
Many crew often mused that the a/c frequently seemed above MTOW.
If one adds in the unknown factor of 200 big meat eating South Africans who's combined weight was an unknown, but a negative factor, it often combined to give an individual for whom it was his first Joberg departure, the widest eyes at V1, and the tighest sheepskin grabbing sphincter at Vr, only relieved, but incredulous at accel alt, that the aircraft didn't accelerate on profile.
Occasionaly a level accel had to be flown, and on one occasion(maybe 250 big meat eaters), I heard a 1-200'/min descent was needed for to accel past first flap retraction speed.
But of course the aircraft would still get airborne with an eng fail just after V1, ......wouldn't it??
LongTimeInCX is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 04:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,072
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
How do V Oz then expect to fly direct to Melbourne which is actually further?
neville_nobody is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.