Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

CX suspends trading

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

CX suspends trading

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Aug 2009, 01:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Out there
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX suspends trading

CX requested the HK stock exchange this morning to halt all trading due to possible "price sensitive" transactions. What are they up to now?
F_one is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 02:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like Citic may be reassessing it's stake in Cathay. Rumour of course!
Michael Hunt is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 02:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like Air China will own 1/3rd of CX.
cpdude is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 03:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly in a hotel
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aug. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Air China Ltd., the world’s biggest carrier by market value, is set to increase its stake in Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. by buying shares from Citic Pacific Ltd., according to three people familiar with the situation.
The transaction may be announced as early as tonight, according to one of the people, who declined to be identified before a public announcement.
All three companies suspended their shares from trading in Hong Kong today, pending price sensitive announcements. Air China and Citic Pacific both hold 17.5 percent stakes in Cathay Pacific, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Cider30 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 03:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I, for one, welcome our new Communist overlords!
Freehills is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 04:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swire will also be buying a bit so not all 17.5% will go to Air China although the majority will be.
geh065 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 07:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: In the pollution
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Better watch out CX Pilots...

Remember it will be an ACQUISITION not a MERGER with Air China Pilots.

Therefore watch out....they are coming for Seniority and Perks!!

Gliderboy
gliderboy is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 07:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: A Happy Place
Age: 52
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The day I fly using Air China procedures and standards is the day they fit ejection seats to CX aircraft.
Loiter1 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 08:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Macau
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had come across an Air China pilot with expert voice. The way he talked really sounded like a Cathay pilot. Interesting!
AGNES is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 09:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: In the pollution
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is hilarious is the fact that the guys who left Dragonair to fly for Air China (based out of Sydney) would have the last laugh.

They would be the most senior out of all this!!!!

Gliderboy
gliderboy is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 09:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: In the pollution
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And for the record...

Air China uses total Airbus procedures not joint Boeing/Airbus dodgy FCOM's like CX/KA.

Gliderboy
gliderboy is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 09:52
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Macau
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gliderboy,

No wonder. The flight was from Sydney!
AGNES is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 11:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: hkg
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that a paper merger?
bogie30 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 14:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, that would be a mark to market negative equity partial full merger aquisition takeover hedged at 300 dracmas per managed fund bull market.
Or to translate from CX speak " would you like Vaseline with that pineapple ? "
hongkongfooey is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 20:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: az
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just a good way to strategically change the business structure and prevent any other player from extracting cash from CX.
airplaneridesrfun is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 22:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The day I fly using Air China procedures and standards is the day they fit ejection seats to CX aircraft"

Really. Based upon your knowledge of . . . . . . ?
oicur12 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2009, 23:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: A Happy Place
Age: 52
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really. Based upon your knowledge of . . . . . . ?
Based upon the guys I know flying for Air China.

...and by the way they aren't laughing.
Loiter1 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 01:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX Airbus SOPs are clumsy. The manuals are cut and pasted from Airbus documentation. What is frightening is all the background information left out.

At KA it gives one man, the loaned CX chief pilot, an inordinate amount of power in determining operational procedures without account.

It is my understanding CX do not do command training or checking on Beijing sectors because their SOPs are dysfunctional. One example of a most absurd and unprofessional syndrome. Yet KA has to apply these procedures in everyday China operations whilst CX is pragmatically aware of their limitations in such!

I've flown Air China wet leases. Was always an easy day out for me. Just bring your own food. I'd welcome Air China SOPs over CX..

Last edited by And Then; 18th Aug 2009 at 01:41.
And Then is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 02:12
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bob Tandy's place boozing with Darryl Hill
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And Then you sound like a lover scorned....

AFL
ALPHA FLOOR is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 03:08
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: A Happy Place
Age: 52
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess I should be more specific. The problems with Air China are not their SOPs, it is a lack of adherence to them. This is second hand, I do not work for Air China and never have, but I do have it on pretty good account that the standard of adherence to the procedures is quite diverse. The other problem at Air China (and this is certainly not peculiar to them and the same could be said about CX) is the single pilot fast jet mentality that persists with the ex-mil pilots, who also tend to be in the left hand seat. Sure, the SOPs are fine, and so they should be as they are generic, but whether or not people actually follow them (and understand them) is another matter.
Loiter1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.