Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

A320 Rumour

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th May 2009, 17:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 Rumour

heard this : to avoid bypass pay, CX will integrate the KA seniority list in order to "offer" senior CX F/O's ( on bypass pay) a command on the A320..
sisyphos is offline  
Old 26th May 2009, 21:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not offer S/O's slots as F/O's on the A320. They already do that over at KA and let's face it, they already know the SOP's!
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 00:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: In the pollution
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How would that work?

All A320 commands in KA have been allocated and trained up.

What would happen to the KA pilots??
gliderboy is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 02:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they'd get the bypass pay!
Sleeve_of_Wizard is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 04:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: All over
Posts: 635
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I guess that also means that F/O's in KA who are more senior to CX F/O's will still get a Command ahead of them.....(the CX f/o's)
b.
boocs is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 06:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I think it is just a matter of time. The writing is on the wall. In the next 2-10 years, one of two things will happen:
1- The line between KA and Cx pilots with be blurred further (if not erased entirely) or;
2- Management will try to keep us separate as long as possible and try and use the whipsaw. They will try and make us race each other to the bottom when times are bad. (More likely if the China flying continues to depend on keeping KA separate)

For all those involved, myself included, I hope we can plan ahead and avoid that trap. Personally, I am very happy to hear about the possible integration of the DPA and the AOA. This could be the key to getting the two groups strong enough to fend of either scenario. Personally, I don't care what paint job is on tail as long as it benefits our careers.
Rook is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 07:23
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there more senior F/O's in KA at all ? Would bypass pay be triggered ( for KA crew) if the command slots would go to ( integrated) F/O's or as in CX only when CPT's fly on extension ? Guess a lot up to interpretation..
sisyphos is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 12:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HK- A little bit of industrial China in every breath you take.
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just interested as to why you are worried about A320 captains in another company when you already have 744 captains in your company junior to just about everyone? If you are chasing bypass pay, there is you target. It is not guys in KA who have not, and may never be integrated. Once the freighter goes on to the same pay, KA is the least of your worries. You will effectively have 400 captains on bases who have nearly a whole two years of experience in the company. Thats gotta hurt more than some 320 guys flying to the worlds biggest ****eholes 5 or 6 days a week.

Remember, if KA gets integrated, we bring our jets with us. A neutral result to you. Your biggest most obvious target is already underneath you on your current list. You should all be on command bypass pay shouldn't you?
Lowkoon is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 16:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess the real issue is what are the relative "worst" (least cost to employer) aspects of our contracts (CX vs KA).

You can be sure that Management will want to combine us all on the lowest combination of the two!
jonathon68 is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 04:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX took over KA. It was clearly explained that it wasn't a merger. Should the KA pilots be integrated on the same seniority list as the CX guys, they will join at the bottom, or around the time CX took over KA. I have nothing against KA crew, I'm only saying it as it is.
bobrun is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 04:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...ok Einstein, so the same logic will apply when Air China finally assumes control of CX will it?

Air China pilots will come to fly 'The Groups' new HKG-based A380's because after all they took over CX! It will clearly be explained it wasn't a merger and you will go to the bottom of their list and be based in Chengdu flying to Xian every day.

Be careful what you push for.

Suggest you look 4 years in front of your face rather than 4 months.

It's well and truly time the KA & CX pilots got together (with their associations doing the same) and created a unified and cohesive group concentrating on the BIG picture, not just what seems to suit one particular individual on any given week.
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 04:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well put A le rhone
Rook is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 06:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A. Le Rhone & Rook

Just for the record both airlines took a 20% stake in each others airline. This strictly speaking is a partial merger as it was an equity swap. It wasn’t as you imply a one way street. It could just as easily go the other way.

For the record I believe the only fair method of integrating the two bodies is the “Y” shaped method with those employed since the takeover on a common seniority list.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 07:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Y" list looks like a perfect way to go! suprised it has not been introduced already
treboryelk is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 07:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, "Y" is an acceptable way to go.

By the way, isn't there already several KA crew that came over to CX and "lost" seniority in the process? Their DOJ on the CX seniority list is somewhere in 2008, although they've been employed by KA for several more years prior to that.
bobrun is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 09:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Age: 49
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New staff numbers for KA pilots come 1st of June. OK its only a couple of digits before our current number, but more sign of things to come?
trevfly is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 21:39
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I agree, "Y" is an acceptable way to go. "

A statement from those in KA I think!

For those in CX it is:

"sorry boys, takeover means bottom of the list"

No vitriol here just fact of the matter. You cannot dress it any other way.
Glass Half Empty is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 22:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...so again, by your own logic you won't complain when Air China takes over Cathay and YOU go to the bottom of that list.

By your own myopic precedent you would have to then say there was 'No vitriol here just fact of the matter'. You could not dress it any other way.

Be careful of what you try to push for today. It will bight you on the bum tomorrow.

There is no other way than unity between CX&KA pilots. If divisions are allowed to occur then none of us will benefit.

Is that such a difficult concept?
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 23:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX pilots can't manage unity within their own ranks - let alone with the KA pilot group.
Grivation is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 02:06
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glass Half Empty

For the record I am CX. Don’t judge the majority of CX crew by the very few that actually post here. Most of us don’t want to screw over our KA brothers.

A. Le Rhone
...so again, by your own logic you won't complain when Air China takes over Cathay and YOU go to the bottom of that list.
This is more appropriate.
...so again, by your own logic you won't complain if Air China takes over Cathay and YOU go to the bottom of that list.
You seem to think Air China’s taking over CX it is a fate a comply. It isn’t by a long shot. If anything was to happen in the long term it would probably be a complete merger. Remember for a takeover to occur there has to be a willing seller and I doubt Swire will want to relinquish control of CX and KA any time soon. To support my point just have a look at Swire’s profit and how much CX contributed to it in 2008.
404 Titan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.