This is good news over here
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is good news over here
There have been simultaneous expressions of jubilation from pilot associations and of horror from airline management on the publication of new recommendations to the European Aviation Safety Agency on modifying its existing flight time limitation (FTL) regulations.
The Association of European Airlines says that, if implemented fully, the recommended changes would require the airlines to employ 15-20% more pilots.
The AEA says the science behind the EASA-commissioned independent scientific study is "flawed" and is not supported by the delivery of "safe operation over many years and millions of flights". Carried out by Switzerland-based aviation consultancy Moebus according to a requirement that EASA should undertake a "scientific and medical" review of the existing FTLs, the report recommends considerable modification to the existing European Joint Aviation Requirements on FTL (JAR FTL).
The recommendations mostly affect the extremes of the rules: those affecting the longest duties - currently allowed to be up to 13-14h, the more arduous multi-sector duty periods, night flights or those that start or end at night, and those that cross multiple time zones. Under these circumstances, the recommendations would - if adopted - reduce duty hours and/or increase rest time.
On very long-haul flights, the requirement for an augmented crew would kick in at lower hours. Another factor is the recommendation to tighten the restrictions on maximum duty totals over consecutive weeks or months, preventing employers from exceeding a safe rate of working by using up a pilot's whole allowance for a month or a year in a far shorter period.
The International Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations praises the report as recognising that fatigue is dangerous. The next step is for the European Commission and EASA to frame the new FTLs for consultation.
The Association of European Airlines says that, if implemented fully, the recommended changes would require the airlines to employ 15-20% more pilots.
The AEA says the science behind the EASA-commissioned independent scientific study is "flawed" and is not supported by the delivery of "safe operation over many years and millions of flights". Carried out by Switzerland-based aviation consultancy Moebus according to a requirement that EASA should undertake a "scientific and medical" review of the existing FTLs, the report recommends considerable modification to the existing European Joint Aviation Requirements on FTL (JAR FTL).
The recommendations mostly affect the extremes of the rules: those affecting the longest duties - currently allowed to be up to 13-14h, the more arduous multi-sector duty periods, night flights or those that start or end at night, and those that cross multiple time zones. Under these circumstances, the recommendations would - if adopted - reduce duty hours and/or increase rest time.
On very long-haul flights, the requirement for an augmented crew would kick in at lower hours. Another factor is the recommendation to tighten the restrictions on maximum duty totals over consecutive weeks or months, preventing employers from exceeding a safe rate of working by using up a pilot's whole allowance for a month or a year in a far shorter period.
The International Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations praises the report as recognising that fatigue is dangerous. The next step is for the European Commission and EASA to frame the new FTLs for consultation.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Australia at the moment and there was a news report tonite about a new fatigue management report that QF participated in.
The news was not good saying most pilots landed with 4 hours sleep in 24 hours and are fatigued, of course QF management dispute the finding
The news was not good saying most pilots landed with 4 hours sleep in 24 hours and are fatigued, of course QF management dispute the finding
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Jet
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How ironic for CAD. Just as they are looking to increase the allowable FDP here in HKG and allow 3 crew to operate longer flights, the US and EU are looking to tighten restrictions on the basis of proper research.
Looks like an own goal for CAD. They never miss a chance to make themselves look incompetent. Just think back to their response to the Swedish accident report. "There was no fatigue, the crew had rested according to our regulations" Duhhh.
Looks like an own goal for CAD. They never miss a chance to make themselves look incompetent. Just think back to their response to the Swedish accident report. "There was no fatigue, the crew had rested according to our regulations" Duhhh.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Asia
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The Association of European Airlines says that, if implemented fully, the recommended changes would require the airlines to employ 15-20% more pilots"
Looks like this could,if implemented fully, be used as a reason for evil bean counters to give us all a 15-20% pay cut.
What is price of our integrity?
Looks like this could,if implemented fully, be used as a reason for evil bean counters to give us all a 15-20% pay cut.
What is price of our integrity?
