KA sacking their Captains
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: German Corner
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
KA sacking their Captains
I was scratching the head today wondering why KA would sack 2 of their Captains so easily for not comming to work on a day off, when these Captains have obviously passed the very Brittannia-esque and demanding KA upgrade course which therefore seems to imply all the resources put into these two chaps were irrelevant?
In sacking these two who had the right to their time off renders their upgrade course and KA standards meaningless, hypocritical at best.
Shags
In sacking these two who had the right to their time off renders their upgrade course and KA standards meaningless, hypocritical at best.
Shags
Last edited by Shagtastic; 19th Mar 2006 at 22:07.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am somewhat surprised that these comments have only just arisen on pprune. Dragonair have been sacking experienced captains for some time now.
It is not just a case of sacking captains who are invaluable to the company in their general experience but also in sacking captains who are experienced in flying in China. To my knowledge none of the captains were sacked for any professional wrong doing in their work.
I can remember back in 1993 when we had Airbus instructors who were highly experienced captains but nevertheless had considerable difficulties operating in China. To call Dragonair management shortsighted in sacking experienced captains would be putting it mildly.
It is not just a case of sacking captains who are invaluable to the company in their general experience but also in sacking captains who are experienced in flying in China. To my knowledge none of the captains were sacked for any professional wrong doing in their work.
I can remember back in 1993 when we had Airbus instructors who were highly experienced captains but nevertheless had considerable difficulties operating in China. To call Dragonair management shortsighted in sacking experienced captains would be putting it mildly.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shags,
The story is not as black and white as what you may have been told.
The captains were indeed on a day off, but a delay to their flight occured, forcing them to stay the night at the destination instead of returning home. The next day was meant to be a day off, and as currently KA pilots are "working to rule", they didn't want to work the next morning.
I guess this is the "grey" area of the situation. My last company contract stipulated that if days off were infringed due to delays en-route of an already started shift, then we had to finish, ie: bring the plane back.
I hope it all turns out well for them.
WP
The story is not as black and white as what you may have been told.
The captains were indeed on a day off, but a delay to their flight occured, forcing them to stay the night at the destination instead of returning home. The next day was meant to be a day off, and as currently KA pilots are "working to rule", they didn't want to work the next morning.
I guess this is the "grey" area of the situation. My last company contract stipulated that if days off were infringed due to delays en-route of an already started shift, then we had to finish, ie: bring the plane back.
I hope it all turns out well for them.
WP
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I was in Dragonair I would have flown the aircraft back because I know I would have got two days off subsequently. There were many occasions when I 'got the job done' in difficult circumstances in China. Those were the days of relatively good relations with crewing. However after the way I was treated by management at the end of my time with them, along with the way many other captains have been treated, I can see how the attitude has changed.
There was a time when pilots were willing to do that 'bit extra'. Not anymore by the looks of it.
There was a time when pilots were willing to do that 'bit extra'. Not anymore by the looks of it.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: German Corner
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Waldopepper,
Thanks for pointing out the issue for me, I can see there are clearly two sides to the story.
But, it still doesn't seem right for the company to sack two of their highly trained and competent pilots when there must be other positve ways out of this. What's CRM for anyway? just pilots and cabin crew?
It still devalues their Captains in my view.
Blue Foot
Thanks for pointing out the issue for me, I can see there are clearly two sides to the story.
But, it still doesn't seem right for the company to sack two of their highly trained and competent pilots when there must be other positve ways out of this. What's CRM for anyway? just pilots and cabin crew?
It still devalues their Captains in my view.
Blue Foot
Last edited by Shagtastic; 20th Mar 2006 at 19:57.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: hkg
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Baywatcher,
The likes of you diminishes general conditions of employment that pilots work to and also decreases the latitude and essence of command(reasonable in this case from the limited info here)
If you are a pilot maybe its time to hang up your gloves and pursue a profession more in line with your callsign.
v
The likes of you diminishes general conditions of employment that pilots work to and also decreases the latitude and essence of command(reasonable in this case from the limited info here)
If you are a pilot maybe its time to hang up your gloves and pursue a profession more in line with your callsign.
v
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Future
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a question, there was a union directive for contract compliance was there not? So these guys were following that directive when they stood themselves down? What support did they get from the union when they were sacked for following a union order? It is a genuine question, not muck racking. Is there in fact anything the union can do under your terms and conditions?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dragon pilots have been asked (By their union) not to contribute to public forums such as this until both pilots have had there jobs reinstated. One has had his sacking overturned and the union is still working hard on the 2nd case.
Baywatcher, you clearly display your ignorance. It is illegal to 'compel' an employee to work on a rest day under HK labour dept ordinance and as such the employer (KA) is liable to prosecution. As background information, this airline has a dismal record in the courts when it comes to dismissal of aircrew.
While you & your spineless ilk may flex at your employers whim, these two gentlemen did not, a trait so rarely found in professional aircrew these days. Cheers.
While you & your spineless ilk may flex at your employers whim, these two gentlemen did not, a trait so rarely found in professional aircrew these days. Cheers.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CAPT146
Dragon pilots have been asked (By their union) not to contribute to public forums such as this until both pilots have had there jobs reinstated. One has had his sacking overturned and the union is still working hard on the 2nd case.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Karunch
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Hong Kong Employment Ordinance, (it's on the Internet)
"Chap 4 Rest Days Holidays or Leave
An employee must not compel an employee to work on a rest day except in the event of a breakdown in machinery or plant or in ANY OTHER UNFORESEEN EMERGENCY" (my caps)
Perhaps check out the facts before dishing out the insults?
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Hong Kong Employment Ordinance, (it's on the Internet)
"Chap 4 Rest Days Holidays or Leave
An employee must not compel an employee to work on a rest day except in the event of a breakdown in machinery or plant or in ANY OTHER UNFORESEEN EMERGENCY" (my caps)
Perhaps check out the facts before dishing out the insults?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: antarctica
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well pontious how would you define an unforseen emergency?
Would it be " a sudden state of danger, conflict etc requiring immediate action?" (Concise Oxford Dictionary).
A weather diversion hardly falls in to this category. In addition the event was not even unforseen. For over 2 hours the crew had been instructed to hold at destination awaiting a clearance that was never going to come. Ample time to replan for any ops setup with an ounce of ability.
Once they had diverted to NRT there was also still time for the company to position these individuals home on a commercial flight and send a new crew to replace them. The company chose not to do this thus precipitating this conflict.
As it happens both pilots have been re-instated with various punishments. One with loss of increments and another demoted to FO.
Elroy, the individuals have had the full support of the DPA and an inordinate amount of effort has gone towards resolving the situation without resorting to the courts.
Would it be " a sudden state of danger, conflict etc requiring immediate action?" (Concise Oxford Dictionary).
A weather diversion hardly falls in to this category. In addition the event was not even unforseen. For over 2 hours the crew had been instructed to hold at destination awaiting a clearance that was never going to come. Ample time to replan for any ops setup with an ounce of ability.
Once they had diverted to NRT there was also still time for the company to position these individuals home on a commercial flight and send a new crew to replace them. The company chose not to do this thus precipitating this conflict.
As it happens both pilots have been re-instated with various punishments. One with loss of increments and another demoted to FO.
Elroy, the individuals have had the full support of the DPA and an inordinate amount of effort has gone towards resolving the situation without resorting to the courts.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: A large cold land...
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When one only has 8 days off in a month, some months only 7 days off and overtime damn near every month, I would think that the "G" or Guaranteed day off would be understood...
You are on a day off. Days off that are damn hard to come by at Dragonair.
It's a pretty crappy way to treat a "valuable cockpit resource"...
You are on a day off. Days off that are damn hard to come by at Dragonair.
It's a pretty crappy way to treat a "valuable cockpit resource"...
Well P's PA it appears a that a little more knowledge hardly puts you in a lofty position. As Appalled has clarified both 'unforeseen & 'emergency' for you perhaps you can pass this on to Mr Pontious himself, when he returns from his upstairs spanking.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Appalled
You have completely missed the point of my post. I do not know if that should surprise me
Karunch
I am completely indifferent to this particular case, about which I know nothing other than this and one other thread which I presume refers to the same thing.
I was making a general observation about you insulting another poster using a half quoted law to justify your comment.
You have completely missed the point of my post. I do not know if that should surprise me
Karunch
I am completely indifferent to this particular case, about which I know nothing other than this and one other thread which I presume refers to the same thing.
I was making a general observation about you insulting another poster using a half quoted law to justify your comment.
