Sick Out
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Various
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sick Out
The united front presented by the AOA has begun to fracture as infighting and bickering take hold. Sources indicate the recent 'sick out' by Cathay pilots caught the AOA committee off guard and left them in a position which they do not know how to handle.
A group of young Turks from Discovery Bay have taken matters into their own hands and staged a non sanctioned “sick out” The AOA have warned them to pull in their heads; stick to the plan and don’t antagonize the CX Management. Without further rises in subscriptions the AOA will not be able to support the “49er’s” and the prospect of more sackings fills the committee with dread.
Of equal concern is the growing numbers of pilots becoming disenchanted with the direction that the AOA is taking them. An inevitable drain of numbers after the 22nd will further dilute a weakening support amongst the rank and file. The hardliners are desperate to rally support with anxious cries for proxies.
Meanwhile the President is on leave. The absence of the General has left the 49er’s in charge and any voice of reason is lost.
The EGM will prompt a management response. There could be more sackings. The sad result of this will be to further split the AOA down the middle. The hardliners will fight to the finish and eventually disappear. The moderates will see this fight is not winnable and abandon the AOA.. Every 50 they sack weakens morale and dilutes the AOAs’ stance. Further sacking will cause more pilots to split from the ranks and that will destroy the united front.
Personally I believe the AOA committee is scared of what will happen next. Between a rock and a hard place they have to go ahead and up the industrial action to appease the 49er’s while knowing that the chances are the action will just create more waifs to support. Sitting back and waiting is not an option now. Problem is next week the dispute will be front page news again as hundreds of pilots march to the EGM. The publics’ patience with the pilots is diminishing as the days pass and once again an “in your face” demonstration.
The AOA have run out of options as the power base crumbles. The option of continuing to fight, will pour money down the drain, fracture the membership, some may lose their jobs, and run a great airline into the ground. The company has no interest in returning to the negotiating table. The new rostering system has been incorporated. The B scalers get a payrise and now the ball is in the AOAs’ court to end this fiasco.The longer they refuse the more money they waste and the more goodwill they lose from the passengers. Its up to the AOA now. Do you want to help or to hurt?
A group of young Turks from Discovery Bay have taken matters into their own hands and staged a non sanctioned “sick out” The AOA have warned them to pull in their heads; stick to the plan and don’t antagonize the CX Management. Without further rises in subscriptions the AOA will not be able to support the “49er’s” and the prospect of more sackings fills the committee with dread.
Of equal concern is the growing numbers of pilots becoming disenchanted with the direction that the AOA is taking them. An inevitable drain of numbers after the 22nd will further dilute a weakening support amongst the rank and file. The hardliners are desperate to rally support with anxious cries for proxies.
Meanwhile the President is on leave. The absence of the General has left the 49er’s in charge and any voice of reason is lost.
The EGM will prompt a management response. There could be more sackings. The sad result of this will be to further split the AOA down the middle. The hardliners will fight to the finish and eventually disappear. The moderates will see this fight is not winnable and abandon the AOA.. Every 50 they sack weakens morale and dilutes the AOAs’ stance. Further sacking will cause more pilots to split from the ranks and that will destroy the united front.
Personally I believe the AOA committee is scared of what will happen next. Between a rock and a hard place they have to go ahead and up the industrial action to appease the 49er’s while knowing that the chances are the action will just create more waifs to support. Sitting back and waiting is not an option now. Problem is next week the dispute will be front page news again as hundreds of pilots march to the EGM. The publics’ patience with the pilots is diminishing as the days pass and once again an “in your face” demonstration.
The AOA have run out of options as the power base crumbles. The option of continuing to fight, will pour money down the drain, fracture the membership, some may lose their jobs, and run a great airline into the ground. The company has no interest in returning to the negotiating table. The new rostering system has been incorporated. The B scalers get a payrise and now the ball is in the AOAs’ court to end this fiasco.The longer they refuse the more money they waste and the more goodwill they lose from the passengers. Its up to the AOA now. Do you want to help or to hurt?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: .
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So knowledgable for such a new joiner full..!
If you were privvy to the information, you would see the sicknesses were distributed fairly evenly between ranks. And yes, statistically, a larger proportion of those "unfit for duty" did come from DB, this would seem reasonable enough considering a larger proportion of the crew live in DB.
And as for the sackings... now I'm not smart enough to be a CX manager or anything like that, but I reckon, if I was short of crews, and then I sacked 50 odd, which did nothing to change the resolve of the remaining (except perhaps strengthen it) then sacking more probably won't be in my best interest.
If you were privvy to the information, you would see the sicknesses were distributed fairly evenly between ranks. And yes, statistically, a larger proportion of those "unfit for duty" did come from DB, this would seem reasonable enough considering a larger proportion of the crew live in DB.
And as for the sackings... now I'm not smart enough to be a CX manager or anything like that, but I reckon, if I was short of crews, and then I sacked 50 odd, which did nothing to change the resolve of the remaining (except perhaps strengthen it) then sacking more probably won't be in my best interest.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Various
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jtr
But then again; if only half the crew are coming to work; why pay the ones that aren't? The number of flights remains the same. Is this is all about cancelling flights??
But then again; if only half the crew are coming to work; why pay the ones that aren't? The number of flights remains the same. Is this is all about cancelling flights??
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
Trouble is Fool_Burner, YOU see this only as a CX dispute, whereas the pilots (oops, sorry, are we supposed to pretend that you're a pilot too?) are aware that the support for THEM runs globally. If that means financially assisting them, then so be it - I'll be among those who will send their donations to fight the cancer that is eating into what was once a good, decent, respected, respectable company.
It's a cr@p management that would actively work to destroy (overnight) the superb name that Cathay Pacific took decades to achieve, through genuine hard work and excellent employee/employer relations. When seen in context, it is the pilots, who are trying to uphold Cathay's good name vs a management who are trying to make a name for THEMSELVES!!
It's a cr@p management that would actively work to destroy (overnight) the superb name that Cathay Pacific took decades to achieve, through genuine hard work and excellent employee/employer relations. When seen in context, it is the pilots, who are trying to uphold Cathay's good name vs a management who are trying to make a name for THEMSELVES!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Various
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"When seen in context, it is the pilots, who are trying to uphold Cathay's good name"
When seen in context neither the pilots nor the management care about Cathay's good name except to the extent that it can fill their pockets. Give me a break. Cathay wants the pilots cheaper and you guys want Cathay to pay more (more time off; pay etc)
The public are being duped here. Don't tell me you think you are morally superior?
FB
When seen in context neither the pilots nor the management care about Cathay's good name except to the extent that it can fill their pockets. Give me a break. Cathay wants the pilots cheaper and you guys want Cathay to pay more (more time off; pay etc)
The public are being duped here. Don't tell me you think you are morally superior?
FB
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
Do Rolls Royce or Boeing employees consider their product the equivalent of, say, Tupelov or even Mitsubishi?
Would you say, FB that the employees of the two aforementioned Coys have something to feel proud of, in THEIR product?
So likewise have the Cathay pilots been proud to present to the market a Premium product, because they were able to operate under optimum conditions.....now, THEY are fighting to maintain a STANDARD - one which has taken a couple of generations to be recognised as a world-leader.
We all know the difference between buying a watch that is "Swiss Made", for example a ROLEX, and one that is not! No-one knows better than the Chinese - ROLEX is their benchmark, when it comes to watches.
And Cathay was the "ROLEX" of Airlines - yet the current management are trying to keep the "ROLEX" face but incorporate a cheap mechanism - a copy ROLEX!
China has the opportunity to continue setting world standards in Airlines, by way of Cathay Pacific. Or it can be seen to be promoting yet another cheap copy version of the dime-a-dozen Asian/express competitors.
CX may yet be China's proof that Quality is recognised as a desirable asset, in a country where quantity is abundantly available.
Would you say, FB that the employees of the two aforementioned Coys have something to feel proud of, in THEIR product?
So likewise have the Cathay pilots been proud to present to the market a Premium product, because they were able to operate under optimum conditions.....now, THEY are fighting to maintain a STANDARD - one which has taken a couple of generations to be recognised as a world-leader.
We all know the difference between buying a watch that is "Swiss Made", for example a ROLEX, and one that is not! No-one knows better than the Chinese - ROLEX is their benchmark, when it comes to watches.
And Cathay was the "ROLEX" of Airlines - yet the current management are trying to keep the "ROLEX" face but incorporate a cheap mechanism - a copy ROLEX!
China has the opportunity to continue setting world standards in Airlines, by way of Cathay Pacific. Or it can be seen to be promoting yet another cheap copy version of the dime-a-dozen Asian/express competitors.
CX may yet be China's proof that Quality is recognised as a desirable asset, in a country where quantity is abundantly available.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are fighting to maintain a standard....of living for themselves....nothing else, and nothing wrong with that whatsoever, however many other airlines..particularly one down the water in dxb..also has an extremely high standard of service, with an unquestionably professional flight deck contingent...and on "industry standard" terms..(yes it's sad that standard) but nonetheless true....if indeed an unsanctioned sickout is being conducted...then more departure are inevitable...no? Looks like some are playing right into management's hands...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Various
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah Oh of course;
I see now; 1350 rock solid individuals; some of whom are taking matters in to their own hands. A glorious fight to protect the carriers good name by greeting the unsuspecting public with a charter aircraft at the gate! If you really cared about the good name then please target your recalcitrant management and not the people who put the food in your mouth.
Safe;on time and good service; that is your job!
I see now; 1350 rock solid individuals; some of whom are taking matters in to their own hands. A glorious fight to protect the carriers good name by greeting the unsuspecting public with a charter aircraft at the gate! If you really cared about the good name then please target your recalcitrant management and not the people who put the food in your mouth.
Safe;on time and good service; that is your job!
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
"Safe;on time and good service; that is your job!" - I think you're confusing them with the jiggy-jiggy girls clamouring for your business, F_B!
"A glorious fight to protect the carriers good name by greeting the unsuspecting public with a charter aircraft at the gate!" If YOU don't agree, or like being transported by a charter aircraft and crew, YOU need to voice YOUR opinion to CX management - THEY are the ones who decide these things - not the pilots.
"If you really cared about the good name then please target your recalcitrant management and not the people who put the food in your mouth."....but according to all the press reports from CX that I've seen recently, the spokespersons have said the airline is back to normal operations.
You're not suggesting they're LYING - are you??
"A glorious fight to protect the carriers good name by greeting the unsuspecting public with a charter aircraft at the gate!" If YOU don't agree, or like being transported by a charter aircraft and crew, YOU need to voice YOUR opinion to CX management - THEY are the ones who decide these things - not the pilots.
"If you really cared about the good name then please target your recalcitrant management and not the people who put the food in your mouth."....but according to all the press reports from CX that I've seen recently, the spokespersons have said the airline is back to normal operations.
You're not suggesting they're LYING - are you??
