So, what's the latest with the 49ers?(Merged).
As if the AOA stopped CX giving guys their jobs back! The only people who could give their jobs back were those who took them away unfairly. You can blame the AOA for lots of things but there was, and is, only one side that has the power to sack or employ so lets put that blame squarely where it belongs.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: A large cold land...
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"You accurately quoted my 'asinine' support of the actions of the company and then selectively rant over 1 person."
I have given you one example of wrongful termination. There are others. You as much as admit to the same thing.
It is my hope that they will be proven in a Court of Law. These Gentleman deserve their day in Court so that the actions of CX Management will see the light of day.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume you mean 'randomly', which is of course incorrect but no matter. At the least we agree that the court cases not being stopped and reaching their natural conclusion is a way to end this thing. And BusyB, there were offers made to re-employ the 49ers, with conditions, these offers were rejected by the union.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Flagrant Harbour
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shortly posted:
And BusyB, there were offers made to re-employ the 49ers, with conditions, these offers were rejected by the union.
Are you able to confirm that there were offers made by the company.....are you better advised than the general membership?
Because as far as I am aware, If it were true, then the decision must have been made by the GC and maybe the 49 ers themselves to reject the 'offer' without informing the membership.
Worse still not allowing the members to vote on such an important issue. Maybe the GC wanted to fight the company anyway, without regard for the consequences. Which imho has happened.
And BusyB, there were offers made to re-employ the 49ers, with conditions, these offers were rejected by the union.
Are you able to confirm that there were offers made by the company.....are you better advised than the general membership?
Because as far as I am aware, If it were true, then the decision must have been made by the GC and maybe the 49 ers themselves to reject the 'offer' without informing the membership.
Worse still not allowing the members to vote on such an important issue. Maybe the GC wanted to fight the company anyway, without regard for the consequences. Which imho has happened.
At the risk of rehashing previous threads I would point out CX has always presented offers direct to the pilot force, either through the post or in mailboxes, when the AOA did not agree with them.
The supposed "offer" was never presented to the pilot force by CX and that tells me it didn't exist.
The supposed "offer" was never presented to the pilot force by CX and that tells me it didn't exist.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The British part of the EU
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If CX has such compelling evidence of wrongdoing by these guys, then wouldn't it be to the companys' advantage to show it in open court, rather than fight a series of rearguard actions to prevent the courts in other jurisdictions hearing the cases at all? Ockhams razor seems to apply.....
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree H, but it has never been company policy to hang the dirty washing out for all to see. It might come to that and I for one hope that it does. But I doubt it. The company, for whatever reason, want to appease the AOA, to whom, the AOA that is, in the 49er days Hanlons razor was more the norm.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Asia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have been busy......QL perhaps?
Truth Seekers Int'nl :
Not so many posts from you these days, thankfully.
Still enjoying it all no doubt, especially as you are probably now actually flying and your fellow crew members are not so interested in how and when you joined.
Perhaps you should look back at some of your earlier posts, just to remind yourself how you sounded. Try 21.11.02 for starters..........
HKAOA still going, thanks very much.
Not so many posts from you these days, thankfully.
Still enjoying it all no doubt, especially as you are probably now actually flying and your fellow crew members are not so interested in how and when you joined.
Perhaps you should look back at some of your earlier posts, just to remind yourself how you sounded. Try 21.11.02 for starters..........
HKAOA still going, thanks very much.
