Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

HKAOA committee ?

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

HKAOA committee ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2004, 20:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: hong kong
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HKAOA committee ?

Just would like to know if there is any one out there who like me would like to know what the f### the HKAOA is up up to .

This housing allowance is a croc of S###. if this is a democratic vote them WHY is the committee so proactivley supporting it ?
by telling us that they so strongly recommending that we vote for it ? its B#######

personally i think that the AOA COMMITTEE has been given an extra back hander

anyone else feel the same way ?

signed
DOJ
EARLY 2001
goathead is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2004, 21:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 716
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Goat

Not sure your post was as cogent as you wanted it to be but I think I got the point.

As someone who has been associated with the HKAOA for more years than most, my view on what is going on is actually no clearer than yours. My tolerance for pain is however probably higher than it would be if I were 10 years younger.

I think Murray has a game plan that is organised and sensible but unfortunately I always come back to the same reality, something that the bulk of pilots now do not accept, and that is, it is far better to play upon management's good nature than it's dark side.

The body has decreed them the dark force and therefore the glass is always half empty rather than half full .

Nigel is gone but the AOA still has some ground to cover when it comes to getting a seat at the table. Senior management is still not amenable to an open book approach.

The history of this company is that more has always been achieved through positive discussion than confrontation. IMHO, that will not change in the next 5 years.

The 'new' AOA is aiming to get a seat at the table without overtly being seen to be capitulating. This is a delicate task. They have the elected people to do that but, if I can be frank, and without naming names, there is some office baggage that must be jettisoned. The current confusion is the result of an attempt at trade-off, again IMHO.

Last edited by VR-HFX; 19th Feb 2004 at 08:44.
VR-HFX is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2004, 22:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: up here, everyone looks like ants!
Posts: 966
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it strange that the company has gone all-out to destroy the AOA through persistent and vehement attacks over the past years. The exodus of members has been carefully maneuvered by management and yet, here they are, "negotiating" with representatives of (by the company's own numbers) BARELY a majority of the aircrew.

The company has effectively disenfranchised almost half the aircrew. Don't be surprised if it's a "NO", Nick.

What will their (management) options be if the vote is a "NO"?

They can try harder for a better deal - not likely.

They can ask for a general ballot - puh-lease. That requires some cajones.

They can impose a new contract with a tried-and-true "Sign or you're fired" approach.

Bring it on fellas.
Cpt. Underpants is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2004, 14:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AOA advice is that if the vote is no, the current COS does already allow unilateral reduction of allowance based on market changes 1999-date. No sign it or else deal needed

I.e. better to have a lubricated, negotiated lowering of allowance, than an unlubricated, un- negotiated
Freehills is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2004, 09:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Rest you weary heads the housing vote didnt get thru.
They needed 2/3rds majority and its just missed.

So now the ball is definately in the committees and companies court.
hi alt is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2004, 08:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst I understand the hoi polloi voting down the housing scheme changes, even though I think they will still happen. I don't understand how people that ostensibly support the AOA themselves have driven another nail into the coffin. Why should the company bother to negotiate with an organisation that represents a minority of aircrew and an organisation that cannot even influence its own? The ball is firmly in the bean counters corner now and will come back at us with a lot of gusto. Did I hear a rumour that another pilots union is quietly gaining momentum?
shortly is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2004, 15:44
  #7 (permalink)  
Captain White
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Snoop Here you go again !

What could the HKAOA members possibly get that IMPROVES their life from accepting this reduction in their conditions ??

This does nothing to improve relationships and smells of something very nasty indeed. HKG property prices rising again, inflation reappearing & CX excellent profits despite the whining !

Meanwhile.........
* More inadvertent flap retractions on the airbus fleet
* Demolished undercarriage on A340 at Sydney
* Tail scrape at Auckland

So bad morale appears to be raising its ugly head in the form of Safety Issues and the AOA wants to ASSIST the company in further reducing conditions..........

Seriously folks ! This beggars belief !!!
 
Old 29th Mar 2004, 08:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: HK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shortly,

You really are a miserable management plant

HUSTLER

doesn't change who he is blue eagle but i hope that satisfies you

Last edited by HUSTLER; 29th Mar 2004 at 12:28.
HUSTLER is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2004, 11:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hustler Please check your Private Messages, thanks.

BlueEagle - Moderator.
BlueEagle is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2004, 09:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, Capt White, come on

"* More inadvertent flap retractions on the airbus fleet
* Demolished undercarriage on A340 at Sydney
* Tail scrape at Auckland"

seem to me to be much more symptoms of incompetence or deficient training

To blame them on low morale that may or may not be caused by by a proposal to lower the Housing Allowance, (which I also disagree with), is something of a stretch for even the most strident of hard done bys.
pontius's pa is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2004, 01:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could a miserable management plant be a Fern? Or maybe a gooseberry. I like plants, especially trees so thanks for the compliment H.
shortly is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2004, 07:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In a box
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Perhaps shortly refers to your memory capacity old bean...if you remember it was Jeff F, Brian T, and behind the scenes as ever Paul H who, BY THREATENING INDUSTRIAL ACTION, (not the spineless 'sickout' conceived by the recent incumbents), forced the DFO of the time to, wait for it, come to the AOA meeting on the strike vote to capitulate. Because he knew we were organised properly, and pissed off enough (over housing actually, due to increasing HK house prices, ring a bell?) to strike. (Don't imagine the peanut boy doing this somehow).
This was the foundation for 'A' scales which we all know and love........
So don't knock the plant life, and let him rest in peace on his farm in Canada.

Schrodingers Cat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.