Semi-circular rule - help!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Semi-circular rule - help!
Hi all.
In light of the recent conversation about the quadrantal rule (see http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=217051), I was hoping for a bit of explanation on the finer points of the semi-circular rule.
I'm currently preparing for my final NATS interview and this is in the material but I'm not sure I understand it completely. Essentially the book given to me by NATS to study says the following:
Inside controlled airspace when flying IFR above FL245, the following applies:
Heading 000 - 179 - FL250 is the lowest usable FL, then increments of 4000ft from FL290 @ odd FL's.
Heading 180 - 359 - FL 260 is the lowest usable FL, then increments of 4000ft from FL310 @ even FL's.
It's the second part that gets me; I understand that 4000ft from FL250 is FL290 and then so on. What I dont get is a) why the massive seperation distance of 4000ft when surely 2000ft would suffice to allow minimum seperation while leaving room for opposite direction traffic and b) why do the westboud flights have to jump from FL260 to FL 310 (5000ft when everything else is 4000ft)?
Now I'm suspecting that the reference in my book from NATS about the next westbound FL being FL310 could just be a typo, but I'd like some clarification on this if at all possible.
Many thanks in advance,
B
In light of the recent conversation about the quadrantal rule (see http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=217051), I was hoping for a bit of explanation on the finer points of the semi-circular rule.
I'm currently preparing for my final NATS interview and this is in the material but I'm not sure I understand it completely. Essentially the book given to me by NATS to study says the following:
Inside controlled airspace when flying IFR above FL245, the following applies:
Heading 000 - 179 - FL250 is the lowest usable FL, then increments of 4000ft from FL290 @ odd FL's.
Heading 180 - 359 - FL 260 is the lowest usable FL, then increments of 4000ft from FL310 @ even FL's.
It's the second part that gets me; I understand that 4000ft from FL250 is FL290 and then so on. What I dont get is a) why the massive seperation distance of 4000ft when surely 2000ft would suffice to allow minimum seperation while leaving room for opposite direction traffic and b) why do the westboud flights have to jump from FL260 to FL 310 (5000ft when everything else is 4000ft)?
Now I'm suspecting that the reference in my book from NATS about the next westbound FL being FL310 could just be a typo, but I'd like some clarification on this if at all possible.
Many thanks in advance,
B
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the yellow submarine
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as i can remember,up to FL290 -vert.separation is 1000' for opposite direction traffic,and 2000' for same direction traffic.
eastbound levels are 250(the lowest ,as you said),270 and 290
westbound levels are 260 and 280.
Above FL290 is (was) "increased" vertical separation ,so now it's 2000' for opposite direction traffic and 4000' for same direction traffic .
eastbound levels are(were) 330,370, 410...etc
westbound levels are (were) 310,350,390,430...etc
regards
eastbound levels are 250(the lowest ,as you said),270 and 290
westbound levels are 260 and 280.
Above FL290 is (was) "increased" vertical separation ,so now it's 2000' for opposite direction traffic and 4000' for same direction traffic .
eastbound levels are(were) 330,370, 410...etc
westbound levels are (were) 310,350,390,430...etc
regards
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All European Airspace is now RVSM airspace - so you can forget the change in separation above FL290. It's 1000ft apart all the way up.
Also - It's magnetic TRACK - not Heading (Heading is where the aircraft is pointing, but with a strong crosswind it's track across the ground will be different).
So - Magnetic Track 000-179: FL 70, 90, 110................270, 290, 310, 330 etc.
180-359: FL60, 80, 100................ 260, 280, 300, 320 etc
Also - It's magnetic TRACK - not Heading (Heading is where the aircraft is pointing, but with a strong crosswind it's track across the ground will be different).
So - Magnetic Track 000-179: FL 70, 90, 110................270, 290, 310, 330 etc.
180-359: FL60, 80, 100................ 260, 280, 300, 320 etc
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swanwick, England
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Until recent years you rarely spoke to stuff above 400 but now its pretty common to have to separate loads of stuff at 430
I've even spoken to the JCB gulfstream at 530 which must have been some view from the flight deck!
I've even spoken to the JCB gulfstream at 530 which must have been some view from the flight deck!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even better:
A G5 en route from Moscow to the Caribbean which entered London Airspace at FL550. When asked, he said his planned time en route was 13 hours, and when he got there he would still have an hour's flying fuel left with reserves!
Edited to say: The semi-circular rules do not ALWAYS follow convention: South of ORTAC Brest Control use conventionally Eastbound levels (330, 350,370 etc) for Westbound (= Southbound) traffic due to conflicts with crossing traffic over the Brest peninsular.
In addition, the core Oceanic tracks use every level to maximise capacity. There is no opposite direction traffic on the core tracks so they can all go at 290,300,310,320,330 etc
A G5 en route from Moscow to the Caribbean which entered London Airspace at FL550. When asked, he said his planned time en route was 13 hours, and when he got there he would still have an hour's flying fuel left with reserves!
Edited to say: The semi-circular rules do not ALWAYS follow convention: South of ORTAC Brest Control use conventionally Eastbound levels (330, 350,370 etc) for Westbound (= Southbound) traffic due to conflicts with crossing traffic over the Brest peninsular.
In addition, the core Oceanic tracks use every level to maximise capacity. There is no opposite direction traffic on the core tracks so they can all go at 290,300,310,320,330 etc
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just to chip in six'pen'orth... ISTR the reason why the separation above F290 was increased was because of inaccuracy in old-fashioned clockwork altimeters... newer equipment (coupled with an imperative to squeeze more aircraft in) hence Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) and the separation can be reduced?
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: surrey
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bonjour Pierre
Or should that be 'allroight moy luvverrr'
I believe you are correct - airspace 'pressure' and better equipment. 'sfunny how the accuracy of altimeteres has suddenly improved!!
Or should that be 'allroight moy luvverrr'
I believe you are correct - airspace 'pressure' and better equipment. 'sfunny how the accuracy of altimeteres has suddenly improved!!
Originally Posted by Brett Davis
In light of the recent conversation about the quadrantal rule, I was hoping for a bit of explanation on the finer points of the semi-circular rule.
I'm currently preparing for my final NATS interview and this is in the material but I'm not sure I understand it completely. Essentially the book given to me by NATS to study says the following:
I'm currently preparing for my final NATS interview and this is in the material but I'm not sure I understand it completely. Essentially the book given to me by NATS to study says the following:
Of course the conventions in the semi-circular rule are used for IFR flight in controlled airspace at all levels, according to MATS Part 1. But you might score trivia points with your interviewer for that particular "finer point".
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Centre of old Europe
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Better accuracy of altitude measuring equipment and pressure to increase capacity, that's the story and I think by itself there is nothing wrong with it.
But I have a question on turbulence.
Is turbulence behind heavy aircraft, with a tendency to slowly drop but staying persistent for quite a few minutes, a problem for the lighther categories of aircraft flying thousand feet below on the same precision track?
The expected advent of light jets able to fly up till FL410 may aggravate the problem.
What does one think?
But I have a question on turbulence.
Is turbulence behind heavy aircraft, with a tendency to slowly drop but staying persistent for quite a few minutes, a problem for the lighther categories of aircraft flying thousand feet below on the same precision track?
The expected advent of light jets able to fly up till FL410 may aggravate the problem.
What does one think?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Newcastle
Age: 43
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just when you thought this one had been put to bed......
Just out of mere curiosity more than anything else and taking onboard all the previous posts:
Would I be right in saying that...... where RVSM ends (ie FL410) - this last RVSM FL is eastbound. After that there is 2000ft separation, so the next FL available is FL 430 which is also eastbound and the next westbound FL is 450, then ...FL470 east, FL490 west etc...
This means that between the last RVSM westbound FL 400 and next subsequent westbound level FL450 - there is a difference of 50FL instead of the 40FL separation as in the others above RVSM for each direction?
Westbound...................Eastbound
400
.......................................410
.......................................430
450
.......................................470
490
Also, magnetic track vs headings? Does this mean your aircraft could be pointing in a northerly heading, but due to the wind, it could be tracking an easterley direction (ok very strong winds in that case) in theory?
Thanks
Just out of mere curiosity more than anything else and taking onboard all the previous posts:
Would I be right in saying that...... where RVSM ends (ie FL410) - this last RVSM FL is eastbound. After that there is 2000ft separation, so the next FL available is FL 430 which is also eastbound and the next westbound FL is 450, then ...FL470 east, FL490 west etc...
This means that between the last RVSM westbound FL 400 and next subsequent westbound level FL450 - there is a difference of 50FL instead of the 40FL separation as in the others above RVSM for each direction?
Westbound...................Eastbound
400
.......................................410
.......................................430
450
.......................................470
490
Also, magnetic track vs headings? Does this mean your aircraft could be pointing in a northerly heading, but due to the wind, it could be tracking an easterley direction (ok very strong winds in that case) in theory?
Thanks
Last edited by BA Baracus; 23rd Mar 2006 at 11:38.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BA Baracus
Also, magnetic track vs headings? Does this mean your aircraft could be pointing in a northerly heading, but due to the wind, it could be tracking an easterley direction (ok very strong winds in that case) in theory?
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the yellow submarine
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Baracus
Nope ,you're wrong.It's always odd level-even level-odd level..etc..that pattern.So ,last RVSM level is FL410 which is an odd FL,next one must be even FL.But now we must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic -so next even level would be FL 430,than next odd level is FL 450,even 470,odd 490..etc .
regards
Nope ,you're wrong.It's always odd level-even level-odd level..etc..that pattern.So ,last RVSM level is FL410 which is an odd FL,next one must be even FL.But now we must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic -so next even level would be FL 430,than next odd level is FL 450,even 470,odd 490..etc .
regards
Last edited by camisa10; 23rd Mar 2006 at 11:49.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southampton
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by camisa10
BA Baracus
Nope ,you're wrong.It's always odd level-even level-odd level..etc..that pattern.So ,last RVSM level is FL410 which is an odd FL,next one must be even FL.But now we must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic -so next even level would be FL 430,than next odd level is FL 450,even 470,odd 490..etc .
regards
Nope ,you're wrong.It's always odd level-even level-odd level..etc..that pattern.So ,last RVSM level is FL410 which is an odd FL,next one must be even FL.But now we must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic -so next even level would be FL 430,than next odd level is FL 450,even 470,odd 490..etc .
regards
'Odd' and 'even' are confusing 'units' of nomenclature, at least in Upper Airspace (where the Quadrantal does not apply anyway).
It should be simply Westbound and Eastbound really.
Even before RVSM, some Westbound levels were numerically 'Odd' (F310, F350, F390, etc, etc)
It should be simply Westbound and Eastbound really.
Even before RVSM, some Westbound levels were numerically 'Odd' (F310, F350, F390, etc, etc)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the yellow submarine
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brett Davis
Ok,have to admit-it is a bit confusing at first but,let's try to simplify it:
-up to FL 290 apply 1000 ft for opposite direction traffic.So eastbound level is 250,westbound 260,e-bound 270,w-bound 280,e-bound 290.
Ok..now we have two possibilities for higher altitudes-RVSM scheme and NON RVSM scheme.
*RVSM scheme:
the same pattern is applied up to FL 410 which is the last eastbound RVSM level,next level is NON RVSM westbound level ,and now 2000 ft vertical separation must be applied.So ,next westbound level is 430,e-bound 450,w-bound 470,e-bound 490...etc
*NON RVSM scheme
above 290 you must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic.Next westbound level is 310,e-bound 330,..etc
So eastbound levels are : 330,370,410,450,490..
and westbound levels are : 310,350,390,430,470,510...etc
cheers
Ok,have to admit-it is a bit confusing at first but,let's try to simplify it:
-up to FL 290 apply 1000 ft for opposite direction traffic.So eastbound level is 250,westbound 260,e-bound 270,w-bound 280,e-bound 290.
Ok..now we have two possibilities for higher altitudes-RVSM scheme and NON RVSM scheme.
*RVSM scheme:
the same pattern is applied up to FL 410 which is the last eastbound RVSM level,next level is NON RVSM westbound level ,and now 2000 ft vertical separation must be applied.So ,next westbound level is 430,e-bound 450,w-bound 470,e-bound 490...etc
*NON RVSM scheme
above 290 you must apply 2000' for opposite direction traffic.Next westbound level is 310,e-bound 330,..etc
So eastbound levels are : 330,370,410,450,490..
and westbound levels are : 310,350,390,430,470,510...etc
cheers