Virgin and BMI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin and BMI
I know this one has been beaten to death but....... A very good source tells me that Branson and Bishop held further talks this week and are getting closer to a takeover deal !! Any news?
TBE.
TBE.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the Midlands
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hear the call centre at NEMA is the next thing to go, why would Virgin want a bunch of reservations staff at NEMA anyway if this merger happens? Apparently, they're already seeing what they can offer as redundancy in the counting house at Donington Hall.
I think it would all slot into place nicely, leaving the Bishop with his bmibaby to play with instead of loss-making mainline.
I think it would all slot into place nicely, leaving the Bishop with his bmibaby to play with instead of loss-making mainline.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trolly
Re:"I think it would all slot into place nicely, leaving the Bishop with his bmibaby to play with instead of loss-making mainline."
I think you need to get your facts right,Mainline made a profit but other parts of the company brought the group into an overall loss.
I heard a meeting with Virgin crews was to take place last thus any truth in it.
Rgds K.I.L.
Re:"I think it would all slot into place nicely, leaving the Bishop with his bmibaby to play with instead of loss-making mainline."
I think you need to get your facts right,Mainline made a profit but other parts of the company brought the group into an overall loss.
I heard a meeting with Virgin crews was to take place last thus any truth in it.
Rgds K.I.L.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the Midlands
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K.I.L.:
Think about it for a moment, bmibaby fares are often more expensive than mainline fares.... how can mainline be honestly making a profit!!!
Its all smoke and mirrors if you ask me. Thats what they pay expensive accounts for, to massge figures and make it look like they're in profit when they're not. If you had access to the revenue on these flights (and I did!) you would see most mainline flights are full of people down the back who've paid tupence halfpenny to travel on a internet only fare.
Why do you think mainline ditched most of their in-flight service apart from biscuits and drinks...? No money maybe???
Think about it for a moment, bmibaby fares are often more expensive than mainline fares.... how can mainline be honestly making a profit!!!
Its all smoke and mirrors if you ask me. Thats what they pay expensive accounts for, to massge figures and make it look like they're in profit when they're not. If you had access to the revenue on these flights (and I did!) you would see most mainline flights are full of people down the back who've paid tupence halfpenny to travel on a internet only fare.
Why do you think mainline ditched most of their in-flight service apart from biscuits and drinks...? No money maybe???
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand at all why it's 'obvious' that there should be a merger between BMI and Virgin. Virgin is a profitable premium long haul carrier with probably the strongest brand image in commercial aviation. BMI is (currently) a struggling provincial, essentially shorthaul, carrier with almost zero visibility outside UK and a workforce whose morale seems in terminal decline.
Full service shorthaul carriers in Europe are on the slippery slope toward extinction. Full service on flights of less than three hours duration is likely to become a relatively rare, niche operation as the great unwashed public continues to demand more and more utlitarian air transport. In other words, the conventional market for BMI is disappearing, fast. What's the point in Virgin buying into this dying breed - and diluting the brand at the same time? Virgin Group doesn't seem to want to be in the low cost market in Europe either - it's recently tried to divest itself of Virgin Express. I suspect that Virgin (and Singapore - 49% owners of Virgin Atlantic) don't appreciate the brand devaluation that association with the low cost market brings.
No, the only thing that Virgin Atlantic wants from BMI is slots - and I reckon the Bish will make Branson work very hard for them! As for meetings with the crews at Virgin - Virgin doesn't ask it's crews about strategic business decisions! Last Thursday's meeting was nothing to do with BMI - or any other airline.
Full service shorthaul carriers in Europe are on the slippery slope toward extinction. Full service on flights of less than three hours duration is likely to become a relatively rare, niche operation as the great unwashed public continues to demand more and more utlitarian air transport. In other words, the conventional market for BMI is disappearing, fast. What's the point in Virgin buying into this dying breed - and diluting the brand at the same time? Virgin Group doesn't seem to want to be in the low cost market in Europe either - it's recently tried to divest itself of Virgin Express. I suspect that Virgin (and Singapore - 49% owners of Virgin Atlantic) don't appreciate the brand devaluation that association with the low cost market brings.
No, the only thing that Virgin Atlantic wants from BMI is slots - and I reckon the Bish will make Branson work very hard for them! As for meetings with the crews at Virgin - Virgin doesn't ask it's crews about strategic business decisions! Last Thursday's meeting was nothing to do with BMI - or any other airline.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the M25
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The conventional market for bmi is disappearing fast."
That would be why load factors are increasing then, whereas loco load factors are decreasing.
That would be why bmi's fares are nearly as low as the loco ones.
That would be why the bmi brand now has higher visibility than it ever has before (still not great, though!).
But I agree that the major asset is the slots at LHR.
That would be why load factors are increasing then, whereas loco load factors are decreasing.
That would be why bmi's fares are nearly as low as the loco ones.
That would be why the bmi brand now has higher visibility than it ever has before (still not great, though!).
But I agree that the major asset is the slots at LHR.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MIDLANDS
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never really understood why bmi decided to allow bmibaby to grow an operation out of Manchester Airport, instead of expanding the shorthaul operations of bmi and bmi regional.
Whilst I can imagine there are going to be few people coming in from ORD/IAD that are going to be travelling onwards to IBZ/PMI/AGP, surely expanding the british midland brand, as well as offering a hub-and-spoke base, from a much less congested airport than London meeting the longhaul flights would have been better?
Not only does bmibaby not allow passengers to have connections to/from mainline (unlike zip by Air Canada or ted by United), but it dilutes the brand in the market.
Could someone perhaps explain management's decision?
I'm glad to see bmi are back on track to profitability & I think they have an excellent product to offer either as an individual company or as virgin europe.
Whilst I can imagine there are going to be few people coming in from ORD/IAD that are going to be travelling onwards to IBZ/PMI/AGP, surely expanding the british midland brand, as well as offering a hub-and-spoke base, from a much less congested airport than London meeting the longhaul flights would have been better?
Not only does bmibaby not allow passengers to have connections to/from mainline (unlike zip by Air Canada or ted by United), but it dilutes the brand in the market.
Could someone perhaps explain management's decision?
I'm glad to see bmi are back on track to profitability & I think they have an excellent product to offer either as an individual company or as virgin europe.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The conventional market for bmi is disappearing fast
That would be why load factors are increasing then, whereas loco load factors are decreasing.
That would be why bmi's fares are nearly as low as the loco ones.
That would be why load factors are increasing then, whereas loco load factors are decreasing.
That would be why bmi's fares are nearly as low as the loco ones.
BMI has a top class long haul operation out of Manchester which is growing all the time and carring very good loads
If they do announce a tie up don't be surprised if BA tries to buy one of the airlines. With the way the industry is competiton concerns might not be as tough as they once were
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Digitalis I meant that BA would buy one of the companies and scupper the deal. I know BA are very keen to reduce their debt but this would be a very rare event where they could gain more control at heathrow and I think the banks would see the logic in the deal.
I think there would be a very good chance of the competiton authorities allowing this to get through as the EU let the AF + KL merger through and the UK might as well because of all the LCC competition.
As for both being private companies, they still have owners and if BA offered a good deal to say Bishop then BA could still pull it off.
I think there would be a very good chance of the competiton authorities allowing this to get through as the EU let the AF + KL merger through and the UK might as well because of all the LCC competition.
As for both being private companies, they still have owners and if BA offered a good deal to say Bishop then BA could still pull it off.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
amadan
mattredd,
I see your logic about this being desirable for BA, but there is one very big difference between BA and AF/KL.... Paris and Amsterdam have a hell of a lot more capacity and capacity to grow than Heathrow.
Sorry mate, but couldnt see it being allowed myself.
I see your logic about this being desirable for BA, but there is one very big difference between BA and AF/KL.... Paris and Amsterdam have a hell of a lot more capacity and capacity to grow than Heathrow.
Sorry mate, but couldnt see it being allowed myself.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Well Digitalis, BMI Longhaul opp for the caribbean has landed two large contracts. One with P & O, and the other with Virgin Holidays. Also the loads (especially in the premium cabins are doing extremely well. For example on the 22nd of Dec "The Business" cabin is already full with 6 on waitlist!! Not bad considering they only announced the route over a month ago!! Heard that they are getting ready to announce Delhi and Mumbai, and they are looking at MAN-JNB-CPT, which would be full all the time if done in co-op with new Star Alliance member SAA, I'm sure if given a choise between AV8 air or BMI, I know who I'd choose. I flew BMI from Man to ORD on my way to LAX few years ago in "C". Have to say it was one of the best business classes Ive flown in, put Virgin BA, AA, DL, EK, TG all to shame (all of whom I fly with on a regular basis). Being a travel journalist for the past 6 years, its nice to see an airline growing on its reputation for service. That's why I (sorry, we) gave it five stars in a survey last year for a top travel magazine!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the M25
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fare structure for the Caribbean is also different from North Atlantic. The flight length is about the same, but the basic return fare is about twice as expensive - which might suggest that they intend to make money on leisure, rather than business.
I don't think there is any evidence that bmi intends to leave the North American business market - although it continues to juggle around to optimise the income from it.
I agree that yields and profits are down on shorthaul - hardly an insightful comment - that's obvious from the "profits" that have been declared in the last few years! However, costs are also being reduced (not least by going to single fleet from LHR) to match. And although the shorthaul product is now cheaper than it used to be, it is very definitely not low-cost. They still provide free food and drink appropriate to the flight and time of day; they still provide allocated seats; they still provide a newspaper - even in economy (okay, so what - it's pence - but it's service!); they still provide a flight connection service and support - which is the really big thing that locos won't ever offer; they have a service standards guarantee which is detailed on their website. You can still pay for a separate business class (or, more normally, the taxpayer can) if allowed by your employer's policy!
Of course you pay for what you get - but the point is that for only a few pounds more than the lowest cost of a loco flight, you could be flying from LHR (which against all reason is the preferred international airport in the UK!) with a non-low-cost service with pretty much all the bits and pieces that full service always had. And (see www.spotfare.com [once it is running!]) - if you need to travel tomorrow, you can probably get a seat on bmi for less than you would have to pay on easyjet on the same route.
I don't think there is any evidence that bmi intends to leave the North American business market - although it continues to juggle around to optimise the income from it.
I agree that yields and profits are down on shorthaul - hardly an insightful comment - that's obvious from the "profits" that have been declared in the last few years! However, costs are also being reduced (not least by going to single fleet from LHR) to match. And although the shorthaul product is now cheaper than it used to be, it is very definitely not low-cost. They still provide free food and drink appropriate to the flight and time of day; they still provide allocated seats; they still provide a newspaper - even in economy (okay, so what - it's pence - but it's service!); they still provide a flight connection service and support - which is the really big thing that locos won't ever offer; they have a service standards guarantee which is detailed on their website. You can still pay for a separate business class (or, more normally, the taxpayer can) if allowed by your employer's policy!
Of course you pay for what you get - but the point is that for only a few pounds more than the lowest cost of a loco flight, you could be flying from LHR (which against all reason is the preferred international airport in the UK!) with a non-low-cost service with pretty much all the bits and pieces that full service always had. And (see www.spotfare.com [once it is running!]) - if you need to travel tomorrow, you can probably get a seat on bmi for less than you would have to pay on easyjet on the same route.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
flymeagain - how do you know so much about bmi's longhaul ambitions being a journalist - or do you have some good sources out there??????
India and SA would make sense though if it was true.
Also - how d you find out what advance bookings are like? Surely they don't let on if they are full in business with waitslits????? or am I missing something??
Re shorthaul, I read recently that bmi have launched the 3rd largest amount of European routes over the past 12 months, only beaten by Air France and I think easyjet.... launching the likes of Alicante, Venice, Naples and Inverness shows they are having success in leisure type places, but with them launching Aberdeen 5x a day it also shows that they also can go after the business markets - and from what I have heard from up north they are having quite an impact on the market.
Everyone seems to forget that they offer may business routings like Scotland, Amsterdam, Paris, Brussels, Leeds etc that are offered at high frequencies, therefore targeting the business sectors - the only reason they struggle for overall awareness is that they aren't a low-cost, nor a longhaul flag carrier, but for the people who fly on the routes they offer they do have very high awareness!!!!!! Especially with the market that travels several times a year - not just once!!!
And don't forget what impact that STAR has on them - they are also acting as a feeder airline to the likes of Thai, Singapore, United and Air Canada - just like BA's shorthaul do... it's just that they are connecting to an alliance and not just to themselves!!!
Regarding take overs - is this Virgin story ever going to be put to bed???? How many times do we have to hear it!!!!!! And no way would BA ever be able to take over bmi - the competition people would not allow one airline to control over 60% of slots - and provide the only feed in to Heathrow from Scotland etc....
India and SA would make sense though if it was true.
Also - how d you find out what advance bookings are like? Surely they don't let on if they are full in business with waitslits????? or am I missing something??
Re shorthaul, I read recently that bmi have launched the 3rd largest amount of European routes over the past 12 months, only beaten by Air France and I think easyjet.... launching the likes of Alicante, Venice, Naples and Inverness shows they are having success in leisure type places, but with them launching Aberdeen 5x a day it also shows that they also can go after the business markets - and from what I have heard from up north they are having quite an impact on the market.
Everyone seems to forget that they offer may business routings like Scotland, Amsterdam, Paris, Brussels, Leeds etc that are offered at high frequencies, therefore targeting the business sectors - the only reason they struggle for overall awareness is that they aren't a low-cost, nor a longhaul flag carrier, but for the people who fly on the routes they offer they do have very high awareness!!!!!! Especially with the market that travels several times a year - not just once!!!
And don't forget what impact that STAR has on them - they are also acting as a feeder airline to the likes of Thai, Singapore, United and Air Canada - just like BA's shorthaul do... it's just that they are connecting to an alliance and not just to themselves!!!
Regarding take overs - is this Virgin story ever going to be put to bed???? How many times do we have to hear it!!!!!! And no way would BA ever be able to take over bmi - the competition people would not allow one airline to control over 60% of slots - and provide the only feed in to Heathrow from Scotland etc....
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Teesside
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a quick note on the t/over rumour.
One thing Virgin doesn't have is a decent feed into LHR; BMI could provide that along with freeing more slots for further long haul growth. As someone who travels from the North, I often find it cheaper to connect in AMS, or via BA at LHR because VS don't offer decent feeds.
Still think this is all hear-say at the moment though and a deal is a long way off, at least.
One thing Virgin doesn't have is a decent feed into LHR; BMI could provide that along with freeing more slots for further long haul growth. As someone who travels from the North, I often find it cheaper to connect in AMS, or via BA at LHR because VS don't offer decent feeds.
Still think this is all hear-say at the moment though and a deal is a long way off, at least.