Getting landing G from the FMC
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: India
Getting landing G from the FMC
Hi all,
I recall hearing somewhere that there was a way to get the landing G value from the FMC for the 737 NG. Does anybody here know the trick?
Thanks,
Dinshaw.
I recall hearing somewhere that there was a way to get the landing G value from the FMC for the 737 NG. Does anybody here know the trick?
Thanks,
Dinshaw.
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 342
Likes: 1
From: right here
menu-> acms -> display -> alpha -> VGTD into box prompts
(vertical G's touch down)
not sure about the steps "display" and "alpha". but you're gonna find it.
try also VGMN (min) VGMX (max)
there is also a long list in the acms of pretty much all paramters....
(vertical G's touch down)
not sure about the steps "display" and "alpha". but you're gonna find it.
try also VGMN (min) VGMX (max)
there is also a long list in the acms of pretty much all paramters....

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
Just a quick cautionary note: that value is almost certainly be sampled at a relatively low rate, and as such the true peak load may well be missed. Other factors also come into play in assessing the degree of 'hardness' of a landing too (one gear or two, sideload or not, etc.) so I'd be careful about relying too much on that single piece of data.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 294
Likes: 1
From: At work
On our 733's we get a post flight print out which includes min and max VG and also a land VG. Have been told though that the land VG is sampled from the nose gear, so just ease the nose down to ensure you don't have to pay for the first beer at the hotel

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
@JO
8 Hz is the required FDR rate, IIRC, so that's about the rate I'd expect most systems to work at. And it's not fast enough to capture a peak for something like a hard landing unless the sample happens at just the right time - 1/8 second is a long time to wait when you're trying to measure an impact.
8 Hz is the required FDR rate, IIRC, so that's about the rate I'd expect most systems to work at. And it's not fast enough to capture a peak for something like a hard landing unless the sample happens at just the right time - 1/8 second is a long time to wait when you're trying to measure an impact.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
From: Mud Island
The ACMS report is usually of little use in measuring G at touchdown due to previously mentioned low sampling rates (at least 16hz is required to catch peak G I believe?) and ....
G is measured in the sharp end and NOT at the gear where it should be measured - a more reliable G would be obtained from accelerometers in the main gear bay
Fuselage flexing and harmonics
Distance from G measurement to main gear?
Rotation or de-rotation rate at touchdown?
.... and I guess a few other things
A sea of O2 masks hanging out and sundry other debris seems to be pretty reliable still
G is measured in the sharp end and NOT at the gear where it should be measured - a more reliable G would be obtained from accelerometers in the main gear bay
Fuselage flexing and harmonics
Distance from G measurement to main gear?
Rotation or de-rotation rate at touchdown?
.... and I guess a few other things
A sea of O2 masks hanging out and sundry other debris seems to be pretty reliable still

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
G is measured in the sharp end and NOT at the gear where it should be measured
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Thailand
Please help me
I would like to know the G-Load at touch down (A350)
which parameter is used for determining the G-Load at touchdown?: DNZ, ROLL, ROLLR?
in the report of Landing Loads Report from ACMS
Thank you in advence
I would like to know the G-Load at touch down (A350)
which parameter is used for determining the G-Load at touchdown?: DNZ, ROLL, ROLLR?
in the report of Landing Loads Report from ACMS
Thank you in advence


Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 351
Likes: 148
From: FL390
Probably DNZ (normal acceleration in Z axis). Caveat this with the warning that Airbus (and Boeing for that matter) work on the policy that the best person to assess whether it's a hard landing or not is the person who did it.
The checks are quick and less embarrassing than getting a phone call asking why the aircraft flew on with a broken part caused by your landing.
And the A350 frequently feels like a sack of potatoes dropped onto the runway with little forgiveness for a shallow / late / snatched flare.
The checks are quick and less embarrassing than getting a phone call asking why the aircraft flew on with a broken part caused by your landing.
And the A350 frequently feels like a sack of potatoes dropped onto the runway with little forgiveness for a shallow / late / snatched flare.

Joined: Mar 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 155
From: BC





