Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Getting landing G from the FMC

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Getting landing G from the FMC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th March 2007 | 17:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: India
Getting landing G from the FMC

Hi all,

I recall hearing somewhere that there was a way to get the landing G value from the FMC for the 737 NG. Does anybody here know the trick?

Thanks,

Dinshaw.
captdini737 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2007 | 17:38
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 352
Likes: 6
From: Canada
Sorry but what is landing G?
ahramin is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2007 | 17:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: India
The G force value. G stands for Gravity. 1G= force of gravity. In simple terms it is used as a convenient measure of the loads on an aircraft.
captdini737 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2007 | 18:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 342
Likes: 1
From: right here
menu-> acms -> display -> alpha -> VGTD into box prompts

(vertical G's touch down)

not sure about the steps "display" and "alpha". but you're gonna find it.
try also VGMN (min) VGMX (max)
there is also a long list in the acms of pretty much all paramters....
FCS Explorer is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2007 | 18:25
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: India
Hey FCS Explorer, thanks a lot. Will give it a shot. Much appreciated.
captdini737 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2007 | 21:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: varies
question??

can pilots access this info? and for how many cycles previous does the info appear for?

cheers
spongebob is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 01:24
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
Just a quick cautionary note: that value is almost certainly be sampled at a relatively low rate, and as such the true peak load may well be missed. Other factors also come into play in assessing the degree of 'hardness' of a landing too (one gear or two, sideload or not, etc.) so I'd be careful about relying too much on that single piece of data.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 02:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 11
From: On the dark side of the moon
Well, on the older B767 system I've seen, the G load is sampled 8 times per second. I can't see why the NG wouldn't be at least the same or even greater.
J.O. is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 07:39
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 294
Likes: 1
From: At work
On our 733's we get a post flight print out which includes min and max VG and also a land VG. Have been told though that the land VG is sampled from the nose gear, so just ease the nose down to ensure you don't have to pay for the first beer at the hotel
belowMDA is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 10:14
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
@JO

8 Hz is the required FDR rate, IIRC, so that's about the rate I'd expect most systems to work at. And it's not fast enough to capture a peak for something like a hard landing unless the sample happens at just the right time - 1/8 second is a long time to wait when you're trying to measure an impact.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 10:31
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
You can get a full landing report within the ACMS/ Reports.
Golden Rivet is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 10:54
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Does anyone have a quick explanation on how a modern FDR measures it's G value? Surely we're not still using mechanical G meters.
hawk37 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 11:12
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
From: Mud Island
The ACMS report is usually of little use in measuring G at touchdown due to previously mentioned low sampling rates (at least 16hz is required to catch peak G I believe?) and ....
G is measured in the sharp end and NOT at the gear where it should be measured - a more reliable G would be obtained from accelerometers in the main gear bay
Fuselage flexing and harmonics
Distance from G measurement to main gear?
Rotation or de-rotation rate at touchdown?
.... and I guess a few other things
A sea of O2 masks hanging out and sundry other debris seems to be pretty reliable still
offa is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 11:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 11
From: On the dark side of the moon
The B767 sensor is in fact in the area of the main landing gear. Not sure about other types though.
J.O. is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2007 | 13:22
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
G is measured in the sharp end and NOT at the gear where it should be measured
On the aircraft in question, the 737 NG, the FDR accelerometer is in the right main gear bay just fwd of the B system hyd reservoir.
Golden Rivet is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2025 | 15:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Thailand
Please help me
I would like to know the G-Load at touch down (A350)
which parameter is used for determining the G-Load at touchdown?: DNZ, ROLL, ROLLR?
in the report of Landing Loads Report from ACMS
Thank you in advence
jennwitt is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2025 | 17:59
  #17 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 351
Likes: 148
From: FL390
Probably DNZ (normal acceleration in Z axis). Caveat this with the warning that Airbus (and Boeing for that matter) work on the policy that the best person to assess whether it's a hard landing or not is the person who did it.

The checks are quick and less embarrassing than getting a phone call asking why the aircraft flew on with a broken part caused by your landing.

And the A350 frequently feels like a sack of potatoes dropped onto the runway with little forgiveness for a shallow / late / snatched flare.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2025 | 02:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Thailand
the DNz is 0.21
ROLL is 1.02
ROLLR is 0.29

I wonder why the g load at touch down is less than 1.
jennwitt is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2025 | 04:46
  #19 (permalink)  
PJ2
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 155
From: BC
Originally Posted by jennwitt
the DNz is 0.21
ROLL is 1.02
ROLLR is 0.29

I wonder why the g load at touch down is less than 1.
I suspect because it is always 1g and the 0.21g is actually 1.21g, a nice touchdown...
PJ2 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2025 | 16:15
  #20 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 351
Likes: 148
From: FL390
D for delta Nz, I assume.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.