Whopity, of course you are right. The problem is, that LevelAttitudes claim

is, unfortunately, both technically right and simultaneously nonsensical.

The issue is that the "anything is permitted that is not prohibited" type of regulation wording of the JAR FCL, which said that

was replaced with

and whoever then wrote the rest forgot to include a lot of types of instruction... which is, beyond philosophical issues, the biggest problem with this approach to regulation.

Meanwhile, in the real world, the following applies:

A passing note. I'm a CRI. By virtue of qualification, experience and recency, I can teach tailwheel, VP, retracts, and microlights - all as differences training. I flew none of these during my CRI course and skill test. The same is probably true of most FIs who can also teach these things.

Just gently shooting down one of the underlying arguments being used.


One another note, I think that we should be careful not to confuse "night instruction" and "instruction at night". They aren't the same thing.

G