UK CAA Licensing demand for licence copies?
Thread Starter
UK CAA Licensing demand for licence copies?
In recent years, whenever I do a flight test, I get a demand from Licensing for copies of my Licence, and Examiner Authority, sometimes when they have been issued by them only a few weeks previously.
If I don't respond immediately, to these demands, they inform the candidate that their licence/rating issue is being delayed because the Examiner has not sent the required documents.
I'm getting really fed up with this, and suspect that the CAA has, once again, accidentally deleted all of our licensing records, and they are covering up for their own incompetence by libelling the examiners.
Does this happen to anyone else, or is it just me?
MJ
If I don't respond immediately, to these demands, they inform the candidate that their licence/rating issue is being delayed because the Examiner has not sent the required documents.
I'm getting really fed up with this, and suspect that the CAA has, once again, accidentally deleted all of our licensing records, and they are covering up for their own incompetence by libelling the examiners.
Does this happen to anyone else, or is it just me?
MJ
Thread Starter
If only they were so polite! 
'We require a copy of your Licence...' is their usual phrasing.
Makes you wonder what's the point of sending in revalidation/renewal paperwork, if they either can't find it, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
'We require a copy of your Licence...' is their usual phrasing. Makes you wonder what's the point of sending in revalidation/renewal paperwork, if they either can't find it, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
Last edited by Mach Jump; 16th Sep 2023 at 11:36. Reason: Added more txt
Makes you wonder what's the point of sending in revalidation/renewal paperwork, if they either can't find it, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
The CAA answer to this is to demand that we repeatedly send them the same scanned copies over and over again and for every purpose; cheaper than calling the consultants in.
Last edited by Fl1ingfrog; 16th Sep 2023 at 14:29.
Thread Starter
I've given them my bank details, and told them I won't be sending any more extraneous documents unless they have paid £60 per copy into my account first.
MJ
MJ
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Italy
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have moved my EASA license across three different NAA's and all three of them required a copy of the existing license issued by them for every revalidation or renewal. It's not just the UK CAA.
Thread Starter
MJ
Had that last week….girl in CAA was quite put out when I asked what was the point of sending 1157’s in. I see they now have a pre screening department to check docs before the rating issue clerks get onto it. They still want to check the examiners lpc date as the admin is so gash.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southend
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even when I provide copies of my Licence and certificates to the candidates to down load on their applications, the authority still ask for them again.
They only down load the initial application and don’t look at the complete bundle.
6 times this year so far!!!
They only down load the initial application and don’t look at the complete bundle.
6 times this year so far!!!
Thread Starter
I suggest that we all tell them that we are no longer prepared to do their work for them free of charge. If one of us lost his/her Licence, and asked the CAA for a copy, first they would require a whacking fee in advance, next it would take forever, and when you finally got it, half your ratings would be missing, or put on the back.
£60 a copy seems reasonable to me.
MJ
£60 a copy seems reasonable to me.
MJ
Thread Starter
Successful candidate, who applied for his licence, was just told that his licence would not be issued until I sent them a copy of my licence.
This is a problem entirely of their own making.
They have introduced an internal requirement for the examiner's class rating to be confirmed valid on the date of the test, before the licence can be issued.
Unfortunately, they are unable, due to their own incompetence, and shambolic record keeping, to comply with their own requirement, so they yank our strings, and expect us to dance to their tune. And if we don't, they hold the candidate's licence issue to ransom.
We send in 1157 forms, and register our revals on the 'portal', and yet they are still unable to find them, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
I'm sick of being treated with contempt, and won't be renewing my examiner authority when it runs out.
MJ
This is a problem entirely of their own making.
They have introduced an internal requirement for the examiner's class rating to be confirmed valid on the date of the test, before the licence can be issued.
Unfortunately, they are unable, due to their own incompetence, and shambolic record keeping, to comply with their own requirement, so they yank our strings, and expect us to dance to their tune. And if we don't, they hold the candidate's licence issue to ransom.
We send in 1157 forms, and register our revals on the 'portal', and yet they are still unable to find them, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
I'm sick of being treated with contempt, and won't be renewing my examiner authority when it runs out.
MJ
Thread Starter
A surprise update.
Had a long chat with a sound chap in Licensing Policy the other day, and, although I don't want to give his name, or exactly what he said, my impression is that demands for licence copies will cease.
Time will tell.
MJ
Ps. Whopity, it seems that all the microfiche records are still there, but no one knows how to access them, and so they just say that they've lost them.
Had a long chat with a sound chap in Licensing Policy the other day, and, although I don't want to give his name, or exactly what he said, my impression is that demands for licence copies will cease.
Time will tell.
MJ
Ps. Whopity, it seems that all the microfiche records are still there, but no one knows how to access them, and so they just say that they've lost them.
Last edited by Mach Jump; 23rd Oct 2023 at 19:22. Reason: Added Ps
Successful candidate, who applied for his licence, was just told that his licence would not be issued until I sent them a copy of my licence.
This is a problem entirely of their own making.
They have introduced an internal requirement for the examiner's class rating to be confirmed valid on the date of the test, before the licence can be issued.
Unfortunately, they are unable, due to their own incompetence, and shambolic record keeping, to comply with their own requirement, so they yank our strings, and expect us to dance to their tune. And if we don't, they hold the candidate's licence issue to ransom.
We send in 1157 forms, and register our revals on the 'portal', and yet they are still unable to find them, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
I'm sick of being treated with contempt, and won't be renewing my examiner authority when it runs out.
MJ
This is a problem entirely of their own making.
They have introduced an internal requirement for the examiner's class rating to be confirmed valid on the date of the test, before the licence can be issued.
Unfortunately, they are unable, due to their own incompetence, and shambolic record keeping, to comply with their own requirement, so they yank our strings, and expect us to dance to their tune. And if we don't, they hold the candidate's licence issue to ransom.
We send in 1157 forms, and register our revals on the 'portal', and yet they are still unable to find them, or, more likely, can't be bothered looking.
I'm sick of being treated with contempt, and won't be renewing my examiner authority when it runs out.
MJ
Thread Starter
They just ignored it of course, and continued to withhold the candidate's licence issue.
They really only have one job. That is to issue licences, but they really don't care a hoot if they do or not, as they already have our money, and we have no alternative.
If we could get licences anywhere else, they would have gone out of business years ago!
MJ
Thread Starter
I think that whole movie was based on the relationship we all have with the CAA. That final scene just gives us a glimpse of the secrecy and incompetence we are up against.
MJ
MJ
Originally the CAA recorded everything on a Cardex system. This was then changed to a Microfische system with both systems running in parallel in an efficient manner. At some point the CAA decided to go electronic and scanned all the Microfische data into PDF format. The Govt required the introduction of ERM, Electronic Record Management so vast ammounts of data was stored in pdf format. In theory a good search engine would produce the answers quickly and efficiently however; the system was only as good as the tagging! We then had ECDDS the El Crappo Data Dumping System.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
During one of the many iterations of my licencing over the decades I was sent the microfiche with all my data up to that point on it. Of course I can't read it, not having a microfiche reader, however...
In 1982 I went for my (then) initial issue Class 3 medical. At that time, the CAA ran a medical centre at Heathrow, where I was working. I passed the Class 3 but enquired about a Class 1. I was told that my short sightedness was JUST outside the limits but they could exchange more experience for my eyesight in due course. Well, I had 3 hours at the time so not yet!
Now, I also failed the Ishihara colour blindness test. The doctor said 'well, what I'll do is the lantern test', which we duly did and I passed it. Fast forward 20 years and I finally got to needing an initial issue Class 1. I asked to take the eyesight test first in case I failed it. During the intervening years, the short sight correction requirements had changed and I easily passed that but still failed the Ishihara. The optician whipped out a microfiche, stuck it in the enormous reader on his desk and said 'ah, yes Heathrow 1982 lantern test passed. Tick. Next!'
The nub of this story is that at some stage in the past, the CAA had excellent record keeping, to my considerable benefit. Like so much in our lives today, it would take willpower, not money to get it all back again.
TOO
In 1982 I went for my (then) initial issue Class 3 medical. At that time, the CAA ran a medical centre at Heathrow, where I was working. I passed the Class 3 but enquired about a Class 1. I was told that my short sightedness was JUST outside the limits but they could exchange more experience for my eyesight in due course. Well, I had 3 hours at the time so not yet!
Now, I also failed the Ishihara colour blindness test. The doctor said 'well, what I'll do is the lantern test', which we duly did and I passed it. Fast forward 20 years and I finally got to needing an initial issue Class 1. I asked to take the eyesight test first in case I failed it. During the intervening years, the short sight correction requirements had changed and I easily passed that but still failed the Ishihara. The optician whipped out a microfiche, stuck it in the enormous reader on his desk and said 'ah, yes Heathrow 1982 lantern test passed. Tick. Next!'
The nub of this story is that at some stage in the past, the CAA had excellent record keeping, to my considerable benefit. Like so much in our lives today, it would take willpower, not money to get it all back again.
TOO
