Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

WW2 instructors' handbook: still valid?

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

WW2 instructors' handbook: still valid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2020, 16:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Co. Down
Age: 82
Posts: 832
Received 241 Likes on 75 Posts
WW2 instructors' handbook: still valid?

Arthur Sandison trained in the US in 1942 and completed a tour of instruction there before returning home to fly Lancasters. His daughter has posted a mine of information in the Brevet thread, the latest being Hints for Instructors at post #12771 on page 639.

I thought the hard-won knowledge of 80 years ago is just as valid today: what do you think?
Geriaviator is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2020, 20:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
As there is a fundamental difference between the way instruction is carried out in the US compared to the UK, I would urge a degree of caution. 80 year old material may not have benefitted from the many lessons learned in the interveining 80 years to say nothing of the fundamentally different methods of instruction on either side of the Atlantic.
Whopity is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2020, 08:01
  #3 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Primary training was 60 hours, with 100 hours basic training to follow in 10 weeks.
10 hours a week something for commercial schools to achieve to keep the customer happy.

Apart from the formation flying, basics are basics irrespective whether military or civil.
parkfell is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2020, 08:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The middle
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
I had a wartime copy copy of AP1732a “ Instructors Handbook of Elementary Flying Training” when I first started instructing 34 years ago, so at the time it was only about forty years old. Most of the content was still relevant then, the AOPA syllabus lesson numbers were based on the RAF syllabus, and there is fundamentally no difference (except for take-off and landing) between teaching basic flying in a Tiger Moth and a Cessna 150. The most useful were the notes for instructors and common student errors at the end of each lesson, and If I remember correctly it covered the whole syllabus including basic I.F, night flying and aerobatics. Everything in it is available from other Instructor manuals, but as a handy ready reference for instructors and students it would still be of excellent value for basic flying instruction in simple aircraft.
excrab is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2020, 21:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just look at some of the 1940's and 50's training films on youtube, what they say just as relevant now as then.
Got to remember they trained lawyers and farm hands to fly. And even the odd actor.
BigEndBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.