Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

PBN Endorsement

Old 4th Feb 2020, 19:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 38
PBN Endorsement

Quick question for those instructors who teach and those examiners who examine for the IMC / IR(R) and IR ........

In relation to PBN endorsement that will be a requirement on a holder of an IR to fly PBN routes / approaches, has the CAA given any guidance in how this will apply to holders of an IMC / IR(R) holder and their ability to fly PBN routes / approaches. I recall seeing a CAA document saying that they would issue guidance on this matter.

IN 2017-34

9 UK Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) or Restricted Instrument Rating (IR(R))
9.1 The UK CAA will issue further information via Skywise on the impact of the PBN regulations on the IMC/IR(R) Rating and update Standards Document 25, later in the year.

Standards Document 25 is still dated March 2008 !!!


Thx.

VFR

Last edited by VFR-Seek and Destroy; 5th Feb 2020 at 00:31.
VFR-Seek and Destroy is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2020, 22:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,053
I recall seeing a CAA document saying that they would issue guidance on this matter.
When the syllabus does not mandate ADF, ILS or GPS the provision of guidance is no doubt a little more problematical than that statent might suggest. With no changes to the IMC rating in the past 30 years they are probably waiting for it to be replaced by the BIR.
Whopity is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 06:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 70
Posts: 1,512
they are probably waiting for it to be replaced by the BIR.
Well, I hope it takes a long time. As far as I can tell, EASA are going to require all BIR training to be conducted at an ATO. That means that those conducting IR(R) training and testing as a DTO will be excluded.
ATO-only training will
a) considerably reduce the options for people to obtain the rating
b) considerably increase the cost

If I had a vote I'd keep the IR(R) in parallel - it's still a UK-only rating

The aircraft we use for IR(R) training and testing hasn't PBN capability - I suspect this applies to much of the DTO fleet. In any event, we don't have a GNSS approach available locally so it's academic.

TOO
TheOddOne is online now  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 08:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 655
My thoughts are similar. Except that, since anyone teaching the BIR will have to at least hold the rating, can somebody think of a good reason why it can't be done at a DTO? I've spent huge amounts of money updating our Archer to make it capable of PBN and I have at least three instructors with full I.R. who are rated to teach instrument.

I've heard rumours that AOPA and the CAA are pushing for DTOs to be included, anybody know if that's true?
MrAverage is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 18:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,053
Its not even an attractive proposition for an ATO, with no specified course length and the likely cost of the approval there is no incentive whatsoever. Hopefully the UK will retain the IMC as EASA can't stop them. Anyway its no longer called EASA! Its become EUSELESS or something similar.
Whopity is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2020, 09:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: N . Daarset
Age: 67
Posts: 180
TOO and Whopity , Hope the CAA are reading this , as I'm voting with you . In the UK , IMC/IRR is a useful tool , 'specially looking out of the window today .
Our fleet can do the basic IMC/IRR stuff , but only 1 a/c has a built in GPS , and getting that to PBN is a no go .
If it 'ain't bust ,please don't fix it .

rgds condor.
condor17 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 16:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 93
Everybody talks about PBN as an endorsement to be added to the IR rating, which will be mandatory after 25 August 2020.

What about the aircraft then? If I have an aircraft not approved for PBN operations, can I still fly under IFR after 25 August 2020. (let’s suppose as a pilot I am PBN endorsed but I need to fly my PA28 which is not PBN approved)

Where can I find regulation regarding aircraft minimum equipment for IFR to know what to do after August 25?

thank you
helops is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 17:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 46
Same as before - your National AIP will show required equipment under instruments/equipment (GEN 1.5), and any ATS routes you intend to use will have their requirements in ENR 3.1-.3, eg the great majority of European ATS routes require RNAV5 equipment.
LastStandards is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 22:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Temporarily Unsure!
Posts: 223
The BIR seemed to be a really good prospect but it has been hijacked somewhere in EU land. Gold plating and unnecessary hurdles. That to instruct for it requires a full IR is a good example. Keep the IMC (it doesn’t need to be called the IR(R) now).
rarelyathome is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 09:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 93
Thank you LastStandards.

@rarelyathome: what do you mean by “keep the IMC”?
helops is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 16:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Temporarily Unsure!
Posts: 223
In the UK we have had an IMC ratting for many years which allows flight in IMC and to make instrument approaches, albeit to a higher DA. Under EASA, that became the IR(R) which is to be superceded by the BIR. It would be criminal to lose the IMC/IR(R) in favour of the BIR which requires more training and instructors with full IRs. I can see no reason why an instructor with a BIR (if they get one) shouldn't instruct for that rating - why should they need a full IR?
rarelyathome is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.