Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Night instruction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2018, 08:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Night instruction

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has the usual words of wisdom.
I have been asked by a private owner if he can complete his night flying course using his own cessna 172 aircraft (easa/ G-reg) ?
Thank you for any help.
pipertommy is offline  
Old 9th May 2018, 11:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Not a problem so long as the RF/ATO agree. Remember all training for a licence or rating must be conducted at such an organisation and not randomly by a freelance FI.
Whopity is offline  
Old 9th May 2018, 11:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slightly different tack. Is it possible for owner of Irish reg annex 2 aircraft (pup) use it for ab-initio instruction in UK?
justmaybe is offline  
Old 9th May 2018, 18:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: FL100
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whopity
... randomly by a freelance FI.
Are independant FIs random?
AllanA is offline  
Old 9th May 2018, 20:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: FL100
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Annecdotal hogwash my friend! I am not sure we should be generalising but I guess it is the internet!
AllanA is offline  
Old 10th May 2018, 12:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It is an EASA requirement that all flight training must take place within an ATO except for some of the CBIR, which then has to be validated by further training at an ATO, and, until the next amendment to Part-FCL, differences training. The IMC rating, is not an EASA qualification and so is not subject to the requirement.

Whopity's essential point is correct - training for the night rating may not be done out with an ATO.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 10th May 2018, 14:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However, training for revalidation of a rating (which is voluntary) may be undertaken outside an RF/ATO/DTO by a freelance FI.
Duchess_Driver is offline  
Old 10th May 2018, 14:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 67
Posts: 167
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
and let's not forget that said owners private plane must also be properly equipped
golfbananajam is online now  
Old 10th May 2018, 15:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...and maintained under Part-145 or Part-M, Subpart F if it is being used by a commercial ATO (whatever that is).
BillieBob is offline  
Old 10th May 2018, 16:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: FL100
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BillieBob
Whopity's essential point is correct - training for the [EASA] night rating may not be done out with an ATO.
I agree with that statement it is a fact. It was the further extension to that which I disagreed with. It is worth having a CRI and an FI(A) in order to increase my flexibility to train inside an RF/ATO (for which I am HoT) and outside an RF/ATO.

I conduct quite a bit of training preparing IMC/IR(R) holders for their CB-IR ATO training which is not done under an ATO at all and it works out far more cost effective to prepare for the ATO CB-IR training. Out of the 20 or so pilots (a small cohort I appreciate) all have been better off for preparing for the ATO phase of their IR training via the CB-IR training route.
AllanA is offline  
Old 10th May 2018, 21:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Private aircraft make sure all lights work and that it hasn't got one of those crappy LED landing lights.
Also private aircraft may not have the best windshield to see through.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 11th May 2018, 07:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At least for PA28s, there's an approved halogen replacement under £30 that gives great illumination. One of our aircraft has had one for 3 years, still going strong.
MrAverage is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.