SEP expired by 3 Years +
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: UK
SEP expired by 3 Years +
does that mean the examiner cant sign the licence page XII if the sep has expired by 3 years despite being on page XII,
or is that some old jar ops myth?, or has to go to the CAA.
or is that some old jar ops myth?, or has to go to the CAA.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I regularly sign the CCC as Head of Training as well as recommend for test and do the test. My Flight Ops Inspector is perfectly happy with that and the CAA have never rejected an application. If I train them then who else is going to recommend for test? Am I supposed to just randomly pick one of my Instructors to do it?
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 1
From: United Kingdom
There are no restrictions on who can sign a course completion certificate for refresher training prior to a proficiency check to renew a rating, except for the ATO's own requirements. AMC1 FCL.740(b)(1) merely requires that the ATO should provide documentary evidence that the training has been successfully completed. Neither, in the case of a proficiency check, are there any restrictions on what proportion of training the examiner may have given to the candidate. It is perfectly in order for the same individual to conduct all of the training, sign the CCC and conduct the test.
In the case of a skill test, however, the examiner may not have conducted more than 25% of the required training nor have signed the recommendation for test required by FCL.030
In the case of a skill test, however, the examiner may not have conducted more than 25% of the required training nor have signed the recommendation for test required by FCL.030
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
There are no restrictions on who can sign a course completion certificate for refresher training prior to a proficiency check to renew a rating, except for the ATO's own requirements. AMC1 FCL.740(b)(1) merely requires that the ATO should provide documentary evidence that the training has been successfully completed. Neither, in the case of a proficiency check, are there any restrictions on what proportion of training the examiner may have given to the candidate. It is perfectly in order for the same individual to conduct all of the training, sign the CCC and conduct the test.
In the case of a skill test, however, the examiner may not have conducted more than 25% of the required training nor have signed the recommendation for test required by FCL.030
In the case of a skill test, however, the examiner may not have conducted more than 25% of the required training nor have signed the recommendation for test required by FCL.030
