Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

What would you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Feb 2017, 15:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: nomad
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you do?

Due to limited budget, I started my ppl in Hungary, did time building in several countries (all eastern european) and completed my cpl/me/ir in Poland. Especially on mep and me-ir add on, I went to cheapest possible school. For Cpl, I went to relatively more expansive school in Poland to learn good. I did not feel that cpl required much more than ppl did. Perhaps this was because I did not learn.

When I asked to instructors for their honest evaluation of my skills, they usually thought I was good. From the other side, I never heard someone ever failed in the schools I have been. I believe not because of perfect training standarts but examiners and schools were like neighbours.

Sometimes there is this impression of students coming from eastern european schools that their performance are not so good. Since Ive never had chance to take training in USA or Western Europe, I really can not compare and can not evaluate my own skills

I talked with some junior flight instructors and they all say when you take the FI course and become FI, you really start to learn flying.

Usually I would consider a flight school within a budget up to 5000-6000 euros however I got some extra money I can spend. I can consider upto 8-9000 euros.

Do you think that FI course is worth spending the extra money and going to a school in western europe? I am considering AFTA in Cork.

I am not from EU, but suprisingly one of the schools I contacted, offered me some hours of instructional work after completing the course with them. They are in eastern europe, they are not cheap-same price with AFTA and my impressions are that they are not better than AFTA.

The schools in my country require at least 200 hours of instructional work for any kind of FI position. This makes me consider the second school seriously.

If you were in my shoes, what would you do?
Go for the AFTA or go for the school which promise instructional work in the contract or just go to cheapest school?

thanks in advance
Shibal is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2017, 08:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Spain
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Shibal!

I'm taking information regarding AFTA flying school for a FI course. Did you finally go there? Otherwise, which flying school would u recommend?

Thank you!
namekop123 is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2017, 11:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
If you really want to be a FI then you should go to a ATO that has a good reputation. Those who seek the cheapest usually finish up spending the most! When you go for a FI post, you may well be asked where you trained, if the school has a good reputation, that will be a help, if they have never heard of it, you are an unknown quantity irrespective of whether that school gave you your first job.
The standard of students arriving to do FI courses has fallen in recent years, no doubt due to the unequal standards that now prevail!
Whopity is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.