Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

RF to ATO Conversion - Another Hidden cost

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

RF to ATO Conversion - Another Hidden cost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2015, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RF to ATO Conversion - Another Hidden cost

Just heard of some real shocking news from a local RF that have converted to ATOs. Not only do they pay a yearly fee which is significantly higher than what they would pay if they where an RF but there would appear to be additional hidden costs as well.

They have just been given a bill for nigh on 1500 quid for a pre-audit review, on site review and post audit work.

What an earth? Are they trying to close all flying school down all together?
Mickey Kaye is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 15:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to our world. CAA insist on auditing us in Spain on an annual basis despite never having more than 3 audit points and the most serious finding being that the compass swing card had faded in the sun on one aircraft.....

For that privilege its a the thick end of £8k by the time you have paid all of there costs and our costs for having all the key staff and in the same place at the same time.
S-Works is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2015, 16:10
  #3 (permalink)  
LAI
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On top of a hill
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is interesting to hear. I distinctly remember the CAA's representative at the RTF to ATO "Roadshow" we attended assuring everyone that CAA audits for PPL-level ATOs would be covered by the higher annual charge...
LAI is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2015, 14:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It would appear the accountants don't seem to know what their team told the industry at the briefings. I recall that we were destinctly told that the "Approval Fee" would cover the process. They did quote a figure for "additional work" should they exceed the all-in minima.

An ATO I represented was also billed and I believe, refused to pay any charges in excess of those quoted.

If they charge additional costs, you should demand a detailed breakdown of all charges.

Its all under control:

CAA has made significant progress in GA regulation

Significant progress has been made in 2014 to make regulation of the UK’s General Aviation sector more proportionate and evidence-based the UK Civil Aviation Authority said today.

Read full story


A pity nobody has noticed!
Whopity is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2015, 17:45
  #5 (permalink)  
LAI
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On top of a hill
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would appear the accountants don't seem to know what their team told the industry at the briefings. I recall that we were destinctly told that the "Approval Fee" would cover the process.
Glad I wasn't the only one that thought I'd heard that Whopity!
LAI is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2015, 19:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank goodness I decided not to switch from RF to ATO recently after getting my manuals in order ........it suddenly dawned on me that CAA are real hard nosed b?:"~rds so if I don't change status they can't pile on the costs and stupid audits and I keep control , phew that was a close one !

When the red tape goes then i will switch , might be a while
belowradar is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 07:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer questions asked by PM. The template manual was used and there was no errors found with the audit and no corrections were required to the manuals.


So it would appear that all RF that have converted to ATO and all new ATO can expect similar "hidden" charges.
Mickey Kaye is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.