Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Pilot phraseology at FISO Airfield

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Pilot phraseology at FISO Airfield

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2014, 11:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where I fly the tower staff have the right balance.
Average if the wind is not too strong and instant given on short final only if its a strong x-wind or gusty.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2014, 13:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The "option" is a phrase often used by the RAF during training flights when the pilot may be practicing an approach where the Instructor/Examiner may have a different intention, not necessarily known to the pilot. It essentially tells ATC that the approach could be result in either a landing or a go-around. It has no relevance in the AFIS environment and there is no civilian equivalent.
Whopity is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2014, 23:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
BigEndBob: That's ATC who are required to have 'average' anemometer displays as standard with 'instant' available on request. AFIS units are not required to have 'average' anemometers (although the CAA recommends it) hence they MUST broadcast the word 'instant' if transmitting instant wind.
Whopity: It does have relevance in the AFIS environment if a pilot (instructor or not) uses it in a busy circuit session.
chevvron is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 08:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
if a pilot (instructor or not) uses it in a busy circuit session.
The pilot always has the option in an AFIS environment, you don't have to invent non existent phraseologfy to do it!
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 13:37
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Well they do invent 'non existent' phraseology, so what can be done? I've already informed the UK Ops and Phraseology Working Group, I can do no more.
What FISOs need is guidance on how to reply to the pilot as there is nothing in CAP 413 which covers it.
chevvron is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 13:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What FISOs need is guidance on how to reply to the pilot as there is nothing in CAP 413 which covers it.
"What is your intention?"?
fireflybob is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 14:38
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
With all due respect bob, he doesn't know his intention!!
chevvron is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 15:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The only legal requirement with AFIS is to report entering and leaving the ATZ and to maintain a listening watch. There is no requirement to say anything else. On that bases phraseology should be plan and simple. The FISO bible is CAP 797. It is not the Phraseology Committee's job to instigate change, their role is to provide industry advice and filter proposals generated by and through Airspace Policy.
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 17:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With all due respect bob, he doesn't know his intention!!
But that's the point it's a statement of intention - as we all know there is always the option to go around off any approach.

The only legal requirement with AFIS is to report entering and leaving the ATZ and to maintain a listening watch. There is no requirement to say anything else. On that bases phraseology should be plan and simple. The FISO bible is CAP 797. It is not the Phraseology Committee's job to instigate change, their role is to provide industry advice and filter proposals generated by and through Airspace Policy.
Amen!
fireflybob is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 18:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Take off at your discretion" is the most useless piece of non-information that contributes nothing to safety or situational awareness (IMHO). I mean what is it actually telling the pilot? Even an A/G controller will tell you if there is "No reported traffic".

Here is a very interesting link to a document by EGAST on RT phraseology. Look on Page 21 - the suggested FISO phraseology here is far more useful:

Pilot: D-CD, ready for departure


FISO: D-CD, no reported traffic, runway 06 right hand circuit free for
departure, wind 090 degrees 8 knots, report airborne


Pilot: Runway 06 right hand circuit free for departure, wilco, D-CD
Qwikstop is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2014, 07:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Pilot: Runway 06 right hand circuit free for departure, wilco, D-CD
Totally unnecessary to readback a NON clearance. Yet more useless information. Callsign, Roger will suffice
Whopity is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2014, 11:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
The EGAST document doesn't comply with CAP 413 on several points eg 'Reading you 5' is 'readability 5' in the UK.
chevvron is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2014, 16:06
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The 'option' term is a standard, and commonly used, term in the US. Considering how many UK pilots learnt in the US I'm not surprised some pilots are using it in the UK.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2014, 20:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 'option' term is a standard, and commonly used, term in the US. Considering how many UK pilots learnt in the US I'm not surprised some pilots are using it in the UK.
Agree but when in Rome do as the Romans
fireflybob is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2014, 01:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
In the USA, not all airports are allowed to use 'the option'. Permission has to be requested from the FAA. Pilots are required to notify ATC that they will wish to use 'the option' during a circuit detail and ATC can refuse permission.
But this is all ATC, they don't seem to have AFIS over there, so we're still none the wiser as to whether it is possible to use it at FISO airfields in the UK.
chevvron is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.