Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

IMC Rating instruction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2013, 19:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: My house
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The restriction of UK only FIs?

Ie can an IAA FI teach for the NPPL?
nick14 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 19:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,582
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Many years ago I was an instructor for the IR at OATS - in terms of grandfather rights does that qualify?
So long as you completed the Instrument part of the FI revalidation test (Section 6) on the SRG1169 then you have revalidated those privileges.

Ie can an IAA FI teach for the NPPL?
Why not?
Whopity is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 19:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: My house
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wondered if the restriction from the IMC extended to the NPPL.
nick14 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 20:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The NPPL has to be taught by an FI. They only exist in EASA land.

It just demonstrates how ludicrous the system is.....
S-Works is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 21:02
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So long as you completed the Instrument part of the FI revalidation test (Section 6) on the SRG1169 then you have revalidated those privileges.
Whopity, we did thanks - am on the case!
fireflybob is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2013, 21:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,837
Received 279 Likes on 113 Posts
We have a Chipmunk on our approval (rtf that is ) thats still on a C of A. And surprise surprise it flies just as well in IMC as it does in VFR.

Although I do agree its not ideal for IMC training.
The Chippie is an excellent aircraft in which to learn instrument flying! That's how I was taught 40 years ago in the RAF and neither aircraft nor weather has changed since then.

There's too much emphasis on radio navigation and playing airliners in little aeroplanes by some folk - and not enough emphasis on good, solid IF skills.
BEagle is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2013, 07:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might have been 40years OK and was pretty OK when I learnt at Swinderby 25 years ago. But most of them have knackered gyro instruments thes days and don't make a great a instrument platform. They also only allow you to flow a single type of approach which will be the SRA or PRA. Non of them I have seen have the avionics for a pilot interpreted approach. So would require moving to another type to complete the course.

I do wonder sometimes Beagle if you look at a bygone age with rose tinted spectacles.

Its a moot point though as a check again on GINFO shows virtually all the Chipmunks on permit now as well. Something to do with the outrageous fees DH Support are making. So either Mickey Kay is going to be very busy or your dream of people training for an IMC on national types is a pipe dream!!
S-Works is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.