Single seat differences training
Moderator
Thread Starter
Single seat differences training
Here's an interesting (so far non) problem.
I'm a CRI, plenty of hours, quite content and competent to conduct and sign off microlight differences training, amongst other things. Ditto tailwheel.
I'm thinking of buying a Minimax - little single seat taildragger in the microlight category.
I have a friend I might want to let fly the Minimax. He's got more hours than me, UK/JAR/EASA CPL, including 3-figure Chipmunk hours and various other taildraggers. However, he's never flown a microlight.
I'd trust him to fly something like a Minimax, with adequate briefing. I'd be content that I could brief and debrief him adequately on flying it until he'd be fine unsupervised.
Early microlight training in the UK of-course was all ground supervised in single seaters, until aeroplanes like the Thruster TST came along in the mid 1980s.
Can I legitimately conduct differences training in it (or entirely by briefing)? I suspect that the answer's "no", but would love to have it proven otherwise.
G
I'm a CRI, plenty of hours, quite content and competent to conduct and sign off microlight differences training, amongst other things. Ditto tailwheel.
I'm thinking of buying a Minimax - little single seat taildragger in the microlight category.
I have a friend I might want to let fly the Minimax. He's got more hours than me, UK/JAR/EASA CPL, including 3-figure Chipmunk hours and various other taildraggers. However, he's never flown a microlight.
I'd trust him to fly something like a Minimax, with adequate briefing. I'd be content that I could brief and debrief him adequately on flying it until he'd be fine unsupervised.
Early microlight training in the UK of-course was all ground supervised in single seaters, until aeroplanes like the Thruster TST came along in the mid 1980s.
Can I legitimately conduct differences training in it (or entirely by briefing)? I suspect that the answer's "no", but would love to have it proven otherwise.
G
Last edited by Genghis the Engineer; 18th Oct 2013 at 15:24.
I can't think of any reason why not. Differences training is EASA and quite specific, this is not an EASA aircraft. Your proposal sounds quite reasonable and perfectly legal.
Last edited by Whopity; 18th Oct 2013 at 15:44.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I recently did the same for a pilot with much more experience than your pal. Guidance given to me was that appropriate two-seat differences training to get the microlight sign-off in his log book was needed. Then he could go and fly single seat micros.
We did a couple of hours because he felt that was what he was comfortable with. But frankly he was OK after two circuits.
The big gotcha is the low inertia of the microlight aircraft that catches out the pilot used to heavier stuff at the round-out stage of landing. My view is that that should be experienced first with an instructor in the other seat. But an experienced pilot will "get" it after one or two attempts at landing and shouldn't have any other issues.
We did a couple of hours because he felt that was what he was comfortable with. But frankly he was OK after two circuits.
The big gotcha is the low inertia of the microlight aircraft that catches out the pilot used to heavier stuff at the round-out stage of landing. My view is that that should be experienced first with an instructor in the other seat. But an experienced pilot will "get" it after one or two attempts at landing and shouldn't have any other issues.
Moderator
Thread Starter
The big gotcha is the low inertia of the microlight aircraft that catches out the pilot used to heavier stuff at the round-out stage of landing.
I recall when I went from microlights to "group A" being taken aback by the sheer length of landing and take-off runs and particularly the need to keep steering the aeroplane for such a long time when I was used to aircraft that just left the ground a few seconds after opening the throttle, and you landed by pointing at the ground, then missing at the last second.
G
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genghis, I think that since microlight training cannot any longer be conducted solo in a single seater, it follows that differences training cannot either. That's my understanding of the legalities, whether or not it makes practical sense is another matter of course.
You can find microlight schools using Thrusters and AX2000s - some of us feel they're the right aircraft to learn on for exactly the reason you mention!
You can find microlight schools using Thrusters and AX2000s - some of us feel they're the right aircraft to learn on for exactly the reason you mention!
Moderator
Thread Starter
No, but there is such a thing as microlight differences training.
My question was about delivering that on a single seater.
G
My question was about delivering that on a single seater.
G
Last edited by Genghis the Engineer; 19th Oct 2013 at 22:57.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Differences training requires the acquisition of additional knowledge and training on an appropriate training device or the aircraft. Familiarisation training requires the acquisition of additional knowledge
You may be surprised to find that for a microlight class rating, there is no requirement for an instructor to sign off tailwheel differences (see ANO Schedule 7 Part B Section 2). However, if they are exercising the privileges of their SEP rating in a UK or EASA licence to fly microlights there is.
ifitaint...
Moderator
Thread Starter
Therefore, you cannot conduct differences training on a single-seat aircraft -
You may be surprised to find that for a microlight class rating, there is no requirement for an instructor to sign off tailwheel differences
G
Last edited by Genghis the Engineer; 20th Oct 2013 at 20:49.