Instructor Medicals
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: midlands
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Instructor Medicals
Went for a medical last week and the AME tells me that you can now instruct on a Class 2 but he had no idea where this information was available. Sent an e-mail to FCL who referred me to the EASA website. I have spent several hours scouring their site with no luck, does anybody have any info?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's true. You can instruct PPL and LAPL (and be paid) on a PPL. To instruct for the PPL you must also have CPL theory.
A PPL only requires a Class 2 Medical.
This is vital for me, because I can no longer get a class 1 medical due to colour vision deficiency. I will be forced to fall back on the PPL privileges embedded in my CPL after my next medical. The only good thing about this is that it may save me a little money. The bad thing is that I cannot aspire to instruct at CPL, or do any other aerial work.
From CAP804:-
FCL.205.A PPL(A) Privileges and conditions
a) The privileges of the holder of a PPL(A) are to act without remuneration as PIC or co-pilot on aeroplanes or TMGs engaged in non-commercial operations.
(b) Notwithstanding the paragraph above, the holder of a PPL(A) with instructor or examiner privileges may receive remuneration for:
(1) the provision of flight instruction for the LAPL(A) or PPL(A);
(2) the conduct of skill tests and proficiency checks for these licences;
(3) the ratings and certificates attached to these licences
A PPL only requires a Class 2 Medical.
This is vital for me, because I can no longer get a class 1 medical due to colour vision deficiency. I will be forced to fall back on the PPL privileges embedded in my CPL after my next medical. The only good thing about this is that it may save me a little money. The bad thing is that I cannot aspire to instruct at CPL, or do any other aerial work.
From CAP804:-
FCL.205.A PPL(A) Privileges and conditions
a) The privileges of the holder of a PPL(A) are to act without remuneration as PIC or co-pilot on aeroplanes or TMGs engaged in non-commercial operations.
(b) Notwithstanding the paragraph above, the holder of a PPL(A) with instructor or examiner privileges may receive remuneration for:
(1) the provision of flight instruction for the LAPL(A) or PPL(A);
(2) the conduct of skill tests and proficiency checks for these licences;
(3) the ratings and certificates attached to these licences
Last edited by dobbin1; 24th Feb 2013 at 10:32.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is vital for me, because I can no longer get a class 1 medical due to colour vision deficiency.
If you have a CPL then one would assume you have already held a Class 1 and you can't go colour blind. Care to share the the reasons for not being able to hold one now?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The usual CVD restrictions that I currently have on my JAR Class 1 medical are not permitted on the EASA Class 1 Medical.
Your friend should check this out, because there is little point in him doing the CPL flight test - he will not be given an EASA CPL.
From the Part MED AMC:- EASA - European Aviation Safety Agency
VCL Valid by day only
The limitation allows private pilots with varying degrees of colour deficiency to exercise the privileges of their licence by daytime only. Applicable to class 2 medical certificates only.
Your friend should check this out, because there is little point in him doing the CPL flight test - he will not be given an EASA CPL.
From the Part MED AMC:- EASA - European Aviation Safety Agency
VCL Valid by day only
The limitation allows private pilots with varying degrees of colour deficiency to exercise the privileges of their licence by daytime only. Applicable to class 2 medical certificates only.
Last edited by dobbin1; 24th Feb 2013 at 10:55.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He just did an initial Class 1 down at Gatwick which resulted in a Part Med certificate being issued. So I shan't imagine there will be much issue with him getting his CPL issued when I have finished his course.
He was unable to get a Class 1 until recently so perhaps it might be worth you taking a trip to Gatwick again and talking to them?
He was unable to get a Class 1 until recently so perhaps it might be worth you taking a trip to Gatwick again and talking to them?
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check the date on it. If it was before Sept it will be a JAR medical.
They won't issue any more JAR licenses so they can only give a EASA CPL which as stated you can't have a day only restriction on.
They won't issue any more JAR licenses so they can only give a EASA CPL which as stated you can't have a day only restriction on.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously boys, I am Head of Training of an ATO I know how to read a medical. Its on the desk in front of me, it was just issued at Gatwick as a European Medical issued in accordance with Part. In fact looks just like my own Part Med medical that accompanies my Part FCL licence issued by the nice people at Gatwick.
The point I am clearly making is that previously he was unable to get a Class 1 and now he is able to get one. So I am suggesting that perhaps Dobbin1 contacts the Medical people at Gatwick again and discusses the case. I might not lead anywhere or in the case of my friend was successful.
The point I am clearly making is that previously he was unable to get a Class 1 and now he is able to get one. So I am suggesting that perhaps Dobbin1 contacts the Medical people at Gatwick again and discusses the case. I might not lead anywhere or in the case of my friend was successful.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously though he can't complete the course for CPL under EASA because there is an embeded Night rating
CAP 804 Part L appendix 3 E item 10b and 12b
Which is why over the next 5 years all the day only CPL's will be gone.
Even if he does have the class 1 he can't meet the experence requirements and they won't issue a CPL.
Colour Vision Guidance | Medical | Personal Licences and Training
Also states that if your colour unsafe you a deemed unfit for Class 1 unless you appeal and you may get
So if your mate got a class 1 without having to go through heap of bull there has been a cockup. But I still can't see how you can get round the night experence required for a EASA CPL.
CAP 804 Part L appendix 3 E item 10b and 12b
Which is why over the next 5 years all the day only CPL's will be gone.
Even if he does have the class 1 he can't meet the experence requirements and they won't issue a CPL.
Colour Vision Guidance | Medical | Personal Licences and Training
Also states that if your colour unsafe you a deemed unfit for Class 1 unless you appeal and you may get
Class 1 applicants who fail advanced colour vision testing can request individual assessment by the Authority under MED.B.001 (“issued by the Licensing Authority”) and consideration will be given to restriction of privileges to “valid by day only” and “no public Commercial Air Transport” (VCL + SSL-ILA + SSL-NCAT).
Last edited by mad_jock; 24th Feb 2013 at 12:15.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MJ, We are an ATO, we provide CPL/ME and IR training in addition to our TRTO stuff. I know the rules and have consulted with the CAA about the particular student.
Despite the fact that he is as colour blind as a dog he has a full Part FCL medical with no restrictions shown on it. So he was able to satisfy the CAA Medical branch through some other method that he was able to satisfy the Class 1 EASA medical requirements.
I am therefore suggesting that Dobbin consider talking to them again and see if there is an alternate means of compliance that was not available in the past.
Or just bury your head in the sand and complain about it on internet forums, makes no difference to me!!!
Despite the fact that he is as colour blind as a dog he has a full Part FCL medical with no restrictions shown on it. So he was able to satisfy the CAA Medical branch through some other method that he was able to satisfy the Class 1 EASA medical requirements.
I am therefore suggesting that Dobbin consider talking to them again and see if there is an alternate means of compliance that was not available in the past.
Or just bury your head in the sand and complain about it on internet forums, makes no difference to me!!!
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I hope you got it in writing because they have already refused and downgraded CPL holders to PPL's because of it. If they do allow your student they have a heap of poo heading there way because they are in breach of EASA FCL.
There are a load of ATPL holders becoming CPL's now because of the multicrew experence requirement.
There are a load of ATPL holders becoming CPL's now because of the multicrew experence requirement.
Last edited by mad_jock; 24th Feb 2013 at 12:28.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The multicrew environment is nothing to do with medicals. I was hit by the same thing myself. It's no loss other than to the ego....
I would suspect that an initial medical issued by the UK CAA at Gatwick in accordance with Part Med is not going to have been issued by accident. Especially considering the fact that he went down there specifically to seek a means of compliance for getting a Part FCL medical while it is clearly known that he is colour blind.......
I would suspect that an initial medical issued by the UK CAA at Gatwick in accordance with Part Med is not going to have been issued by accident. Especially considering the fact that he went down there specifically to seek a means of compliance for getting a Part FCL medical while it is clearly known that he is colour blind.......
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We arn't talking about medical we are talking about experence requirements for license issue now if he has the bit of paper.
And he requires 5 hours night flying 2 of which are solo.
Its the 2 hours solo thats going to stop him getting an EASA CPL.
Under JAR there wasn't the night experence requirement for CPL only for the IR. Which is why you could get it before. Now if you don't have anything in box C on the form your stuffed.
And he requires 5 hours night flying 2 of which are solo.
Its the 2 hours solo thats going to stop him getting an EASA CPL.
Under JAR there wasn't the night experence requirement for CPL only for the IR. Which is why you could get it before. Now if you don't have anything in box C on the form your stuffed.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MJ, you have not read what I have posted. He no longer has a day limit on his medical. Has already completed the night rating and about to start the CPL and IR training.
I did not go into the details but I know that he specifically went to Gatwick to explore means of getting a Class 1 medical compliant with EASA. Clearly he was successful. As as I have said before, it migh be worth people actually speaking to the medics a Garwick and seeing if there are opportunities to explore. In his case there clearly was a benefit in doing so.
I did not go into the details but I know that he specifically went to Gatwick to explore means of getting a Class 1 medical compliant with EASA. Clearly he was successful. As as I have said before, it migh be worth people actually speaking to the medics a Garwick and seeing if there are opportunities to explore. In his case there clearly was a benefit in doing so.
Last edited by S-Works; 24th Feb 2013 at 13:28.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok so you have a colour safe pilot who has got the required experence.
I have already posted the colour guidance chart.
You always could get the additional tests with the CAA nothing has changed.
You do the plates fail them, you can do the led light test thingy and if you fail that you can do the latern but the CAA can't do that one on site and you have to get a report done.
Same as it was 8 years ago you will notice the CAA references are from 2004. A few of the pilots I instructed payed out for the individual tests and only 1 of them got through out of 8. basically if you can taxi around an airport at night and play spot the difference between all the lights you might have a chance if you can remember the different shades relate to which colour. Which is what the guy that passed did. One of them statistically got lower than just pressing a random button which was quite funny at the time. Nothing has changed since Sept.
I have already posted the colour guidance chart.
You always could get the additional tests with the CAA nothing has changed.
You do the plates fail them, you can do the led light test thingy and if you fail that you can do the latern but the CAA can't do that one on site and you have to get a report done.
Same as it was 8 years ago you will notice the CAA references are from 2004. A few of the pilots I instructed payed out for the individual tests and only 1 of them got through out of 8. basically if you can taxi around an airport at night and play spot the difference between all the lights you might have a chance if you can remember the different shades relate to which colour. Which is what the guy that passed did. One of them statistically got lower than just pressing a random button which was quite funny at the time. Nothing has changed since Sept.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He as held a PPL for 16 years and tried on numerous occasions to get the day restriction removed. So whatever has not changed has clearly been a benefit to him...... 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bose, it might be that your mate passed the CAD test despite failing the Ishihara plates and lantern tests. If he did then he is good to go for a commercial career and good luck to him.
I failed the plates and lanterns and the CAD had not been invented when I did my class 1 initial. I could go back to Gatwick and try the CAD test but I suspect I would fail that too (I only got 2 of the 15 plates correct!). Since I can continue to instruct at PPL level with just PPL privileges, it is not really a big deal for me.
I would like to do the night rating just to be on the safe side, but it really does not make all that much difference to me if I am unable to do it. Interestingly, if I can manage a mere 9/13 pass on the plates I could do the night rating using the embedded LAPL privileges in my licence, but not as a PPL. Daft isn't it.
I will be able to do the new EIR or even the full modular IR as they have dropped the night pre-requisite for these now. I like to think this was at least partly in response to my comments during the consulting phase.
Mad_Jock, when I did my JAR CPL the CAA just told me to forget the night requirement and my licence was restricted to Day only. Not sure if they still have this flexibility under EASA - somehow I doubt it.
I failed the plates and lanterns and the CAD had not been invented when I did my class 1 initial. I could go back to Gatwick and try the CAD test but I suspect I would fail that too (I only got 2 of the 15 plates correct!). Since I can continue to instruct at PPL level with just PPL privileges, it is not really a big deal for me.
I would like to do the night rating just to be on the safe side, but it really does not make all that much difference to me if I am unable to do it. Interestingly, if I can manage a mere 9/13 pass on the plates I could do the night rating using the embedded LAPL privileges in my licence, but not as a PPL. Daft isn't it.
I will be able to do the new EIR or even the full modular IR as they have dropped the night pre-requisite for these now. I like to think this was at least partly in response to my comments during the consulting phase.
Mad_Jock, when I did my JAR CPL the CAA just told me to forget the night requirement and my licence was restricted to Day only. Not sure if they still have this flexibility under EASA - somehow I doubt it.
Last edited by dobbin1; 24th Feb 2013 at 15:24.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was no requirement for night for the JAR CPL its included in the experence requirements for EASA CPL there is no flex at all and people are loosing there commercial licenses because of it. I can think of a couple of CPL/IR instructors who will be out of a job when there license needs renewed.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some are, believe me or not, holding IRs and FI ratings; i've even seen one chap having a night FI!
There is going to be loads of tears as the licenses come up for renewal and people loose what they have.
For the most part it won't matter an ATPL with no multicrew time isn't going to go into the LHS of an airliner.
Most FI's at PPL level things won't change because they can be payed on a PPL now.
But there are quite a few CPL examinors and instructors out there that arn't colour safe. Whats going to happen to them back to teaching PPL only. They should still be able to teach IR though.
