Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

C150 and MAUW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Apr 2002, 11:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C150 and MAUW

I was recently reminded that almost every 150/152 in the country takes off above MAUW withthe standard complement of two average pilots and a reasonable amount of fuel.

As I recall the plane didn't seem to mind.

How do schools reconcile this issue given that my instructor and many others regularly reinforce the importance of W&B before every flight then happily jump into an overloaded plane.
The man formerly known as is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2002, 17:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's easy for some of us as we don't weigh very much !
essouira is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2002, 22:47
  #3 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do .....
niknak is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2002, 22:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't!!
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 01:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Camden, NSW, Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will be very popular with the insurance companies. They can collect all that money without ever having to pay out one cent / penny. I can just hope I'm not in that aircraft when it eventually clapps hands overhead.
On a more serious tone. You have just nullified all the manufactures calculations. You are flying an aircraft that is only fit for 'experimental' certification.
I Fly is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 12:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I removed the problem - most of the time - by using actual weights. If the other person was heavier than standard weights then I'd limit fuel. Problem solved.

I always told my students why. Nothing like consistantly demonstrating a point to hammer home the lesson. None of this "Do as I say, not as I do" bulls**t from me (that I recall )

In Oz, standard weights are published for use in a/c with six seats or more.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 21:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The middle
Posts: 567
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Its not quite as bad as it seems

Max take off weight of a 152 is 1670 lbs

from that subtract a 14 stone (ie fattish male) instructor and a 14 stone student and full tanks (20 imp gallons @ 7.2 = 144) and you are left with 1134 lbs for the basic weight of the aeroplane.

Cessna quote 1133 lbs for the standard empty weight of an aerobat. In reality most are a bit heavier depending on avionics, but most instructors and students are a bit lighter, especially instructors because they can't afford to eat.

I'm lucky in that most of my instructing has been on PA28, but I did the initial and aerobatic instructor course on a 150. I seem to remember that as you, the student, the fuel and the CofG all coincide it is difficult to get it out of balance unless you crawl in the back (some 150s could actually be approved for a third child seat with very skinny parents).

If all else fails thermalling can double the rate of climb !
excrab is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 23:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Only once or twice that I recall have I been fuel limited. That was with particularly large students.

In one case only myself or a friend could instruct a particular student due to the combination of his and our weights.

Also we were the only two who could fit and still get the doors closed!

Just a point, the C150 had a ~50kg lower MTOW than the C152.
Tinstaafl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.