Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

EASA licence and Aeros (again)

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

EASA licence and Aeros (again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2012, 20:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The IAA are not convinced that a UK pilot with a Part-FCL licence may legally fly a UK G-reg Annex II aircraft to Ireland.
Most Part-FCL licences are issued to meet compliance with ICAO standards so are not a problem as this will already be included in the legal framework of most countries worldwide. It's only those licences which are sub-ICAO (LAPL) which need to be ratified in each individual state. This issue is being dealt with behind the scenes. The CAA were made aware of this at an early stage of the EASA consultation process.

can a G reg NON EASA aircraft on a Permit to fly (non C of A )be flown on an EASA licence or is a national licence required??
Presently, you can receive training and testing towards the issue, renewal and revalidation of an EASA licence or rating in a non-EASA aircraft. The UK ANO (Article 52, 53, 56) provides the legal basis for this, and for flying non-EASA aircraft with an EASA Part-FCL licence (Article 50A).

ifitaint..
ifitaintboeing is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2012, 22:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Most Part-FCL licences are issued to meet compliance with ICAO standards so are not a problem as this will already be included in the legal framework of most countries worldwide.
The problem is that certain Member States are not convinced that they may use their own secondary legislation, subordinate to EU law, to extend (as they see it) the privileges of Part-FCL licences....

Whereas the majority view is that, if there isn't a law to say that you may not do something, then you may do it; the Aircrew Regulation does not state that Part-FCL licences may not be used to fly Annex II aircraft, therefore they may be so used.
BEagle is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2012, 18:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mareeba, QLD
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just about to finish a guys aerobatic training for the AOPA basic cert. I read earlier in this post what if he includes a letter from me with his initial licence application (CPL in this case). He can get the rating added. Could someone please advise what should be included in this letter as I've not done this before?
taff_lightning is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2012, 20:36
  #24 (permalink)  
DB6
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Download CAP 804: Flight Crew Licensing: Mandatory Requirements, Policy and Guidance | Publications | About the CAA if you haven't already. Have a look at Section 4, part P, pages 32/33 (pages 514/515 of the pdf) and it lists all the ways you can get the rating included on conversion. You don't actually need the AOPA certificate, just 5 hours and a statement by an aeros FI. No guidance about the statement but paraphrasing what is in the CAP should do I imagine.

Last edited by DB6; 24th Oct 2012 at 20:38.
DB6 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 07:01
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taff, I will email you a copy of the letter I did for this.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 11:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone cut up the licence into parts to fit in the pockets of licence?
I was about to but then seen a notice that you can't ! So now I have a wedge in the front pocket and nothing in the rest. Daft !
pipertommy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 12:19
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Email sent Taff
foxmoth is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 13:27
  #28 (permalink)  
DB6
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pipertommy, solution - photocopy it (good quality colour) then cut that up and fit in pockets. Screw up the original into a ball and keep in an old condom in the bottom of your flight bag - all in one piece mind you.
Wait for someone to give a toss, let them get really worked up, then toss the condom over .
Or maybe not........
DB6 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2012, 15:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Live near Cardiff (from Scotland)
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pmsl ! Very good. What a pointless exercise this is. Far prefer my old style wallet, at least I could fit things into it.
pipertommy is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2012, 17:03
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Stratford upon Avon
Age: 76
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just had EASA license issued with Aerobatic rating. All the permutations are in CAP 804, download and use your computer to search for the info. I got it on the strength of my BAeA competition results twelve years ago.
Density Altitude is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 11:09
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I was about to but then seen a notice that you can't !
Can you find a legal reference for that? I can't!
Whopity is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 11:45
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone cut up the licence into parts to fit in the pockets of licence?
I was about to but then seen a notice that you can't ! So now I have a wedge in the front pocket and nothing in the rest. Daft !
Another example of the UK CAA over doing things. The licence is actually designed to go into a small clear plastic pouch that will fit in your wallet. The rest of Europe that are issuing Part FCL licences are using this system. Mine has my medical and licence in it.
S-Works is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 18:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can you find a legal reference for that?
The only legal requirements for the format of the licence are at Appendix 1 to Part-ARA. According to this, provided that items I to XI are contained on a single sheet, the remainder may be on "separate or detachable parts of the main form". Due to the design of the UK's version of the licence form, however, this is not always possible to do. Of course, since the CAA always knows best, I suppose that we must conclude that those nasty foreigners don't know what they're talking about.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2012, 21:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: kent
Age: 75
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA licence on NON EASA aircraft

CAP 804 section 1 Part C page 2 pdf page 36 paragraph 1.5 says you can fly a non EASA aircraft with an EASA licence, including home bul.
gasta is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2012, 07:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIUI, I cannot train people for the Aerobatics Rating, because I currently only work at an RTF, not an ATO. I can continue to train for the AOPA certificate though, which is one of the ways the rating can be included in an EASA licence upon conversion. There does not seem to be any problem with this, providing the certificate is awarded before they convert to an EASA licence.

My question is, if I train a newly minted EASA PPL for the AOPA certificate, will the CAA give him the rating on the strength of it, or (as I suspect) does this flexibility only apply to conversions from CAA or JAR PPLs?
dobbin1 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2012, 08:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
The CAP 804 conversion terms only refer to 'Aerobatic Privileges exercised on a UK National/JAR-FCL licence'. The implication being that, with a Part-FCL licence, you're stuck with Part-FCL Aerobatic Rating requirements - including the ludicrous nonsense of having to become an ATO and for the applicant to have flown 40 hrs PIC since PPL issue before applying for the Aerobatic Rating....

However, the Aerobatic Rating is only mandatory for aerobatics conducted on EASA aeroplanes after Apr 2015. If you were to teach the AOPA course using a Chipmunk or Bulldog, for example, then your newly-minted Part-FCL holder wouldn't need 40 hrs PIC, you wouldn't need to be an ATO and he/she could continue to fly aerobatics on suitable non-EASA aeroplanes using nothing more than a Part-FCL PPL(A). But if he/she then wanted to fly aerobatics on that aeronautical oxymoron, the Cessna 'Aerobat' , he/she would need an Aerobatic Rating....

That's as I see it - but check with FCLweb before committing yourself.
BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2012, 11:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Beagle - just as I thought. I was hoping the daft 40 hour thing would get changed, but no such luck.
dobbin1 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2012, 14:52
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From today's Daily Express
Mr Cameron's call for a cap on the EU spending came as official auditors rejected the budget for the 18th year in succession.

The European Court of Auditors said the budget was riddled with fraud and error – and that the situation was only getting worse.
Whopity is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.