Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Be300/1900 Instructor Qualifications

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Be300/1900 Instructor Qualifications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2012, 14:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be300/1900 Instructor Qualifications

Hi guys,

What certificates are needed in order to instruct on the King Air 350/1900 in Europe, and be qualified to do so in a sim, on the airplane and to do instrument training as well? Keeping in mind that the King Air 350 requires a type rating, is a high performance aircraft, but is certified as single pilot. I may have follow up questions depending on the answers I get, but I hope my interpretation of the FCL is the same as yours...
Defbond is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 09:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A TRI(SPA) certificate will confer all of the privileges that you seek, assuming that the instrument training is limited to the renewel or revalidation of the IR and that the trainee is seeking to operate the aircraft on single-pilot operations. A TRI(SPA) may also instruct for a SPA type rating in multi pilot operations if he also holds an MCCI certificate or holds or has held a TRI certificate for multi-pilot aeroplanes.

If any instrument instruction other than that required for renewal/revalidation is to be conducted, an IRI certificate will also be required.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2012, 17:30
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TRI(SPA) is PART-FCL, what about for a member state that has decided to postpone implementing PART-FCL until 2013, under JAR-FCL wouldn't a CRI, SFI and IRI(A) suffice?

TRI was only for MPA under JAR and it would be impossible to get the license just flying the Beech, kind of like trying to get an ATPL on a King Air would not be possible because its not a MPA...
Defbond is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.