davehollyjane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
davehollyjane
Hi Guys , does anyone in here no how a PPL(H) with 100 hrs can do FI rating under the new EASA rules , paid or not , how much cost, hrs etc without a CPL(H) ?? thanks guys
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 57
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP804Cor.pdf
See here for a start, CAP804, part J, subpart 1. Looks like you'll be needing a lot more hours and CPL TK.
See here for a start, CAP804, part J, subpart 1. Looks like you'll be needing a lot more hours and CPL TK.
At 100 hrs you are just getting to the stage where (hopefully) you are able to fly on your own with out getting into trouble. The idea that you think you are now able to teach other people how to fly is IMO laughable........
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey they let the intergated fixed wing pilost loose after 160 hours and not a single hour of it is proper PIC without supervision. And added to the fact they are only taught airline ops flying a SEP.
Sorry to be rude but anybody with a PPL and 100 hrs who think they are ready to just sign up for the instructor course and then go out and teach somebody to fly are very likely to have an over inflated idea of their own skill levels......
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well they don't actually. They get the ATPL theory which is mainly jet stuff.
And the CPL is a progress check with an in house checker. Then they move onto twin IR.
There are a few good ones, but they have most of the time had exposure to aviation before doing the course. And you get the occassional one that gets the fact that the way they they have been taught to fly a single isn't the normal way of doing it, and basically bin what they have been taught and ask loads of questions and learn on the job.
And the CPL is a progress check with an in house checker. Then they move onto twin IR.
There are a few good ones, but they have most of the time had exposure to aviation before doing the course. And you get the occassional one that gets the fact that the way they they have been taught to fly a single isn't the normal way of doing it, and basically bin what they have been taught and ask loads of questions and learn on the job.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 57
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, one of the few (only?) good things to come out of the EASA, will be the allowing of experienced PPLs to become instructors.
I know it's theoretically possible under JARs, but how many are there? Having to do all the CPL TK and then not get paid seems to not encourage it.
I know it's theoretically possible under JARs, but how many are there? Having to do all the CPL TK and then not get paid seems to not encourage it.
one of the few (only?) good things to come out of the EASA, will be the allowing of experienced PPLs to become instructors.
