Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

What would you do??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Aug 2010, 15:40
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe this is why there are occasionally remarks about quality of instructors these days - nobody cares what the standards are!
That was not actually directed at the instructor who made the remark, though his reaction to me did make me think he did not give a damn, it was more to the instructors on this forum who do not seem to give a damn about standards either

jez - at least you seem to want to do something, though it is probably not quite the way I personally would go about things

(And bose-x, if you hear me teaching something incorrectly please feel free to take me to one side and have a word - I think you will find that I am actually quite receptive - we might end up with a debate if I disagree, but I am always open to being shown to be wrong!)
foxmoth is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 15:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're not quite getting it. Of course people care about the standard of FI's. Some of us have run schools and had to work like crazy to ensure that what is taught is always good.

My point is that you've taken it upon yourself to be judge, juror and executioner over one misused phrase. You aren't an helicopter pilot or FI and so are unlikely to have any idea about whether this chap is good, bad or indifferent.

Everyone makes mistakes, even pilots... I guarantee that if I sat in on your briefings and flights for a day, I'd could pull you up on all manner of things. That doesn't necessarily make you a rubbish FI or me a brilliant one. You could probably do the same with any other FI yourself.

So, you've had a word, explained to the bloke his mistake and that should be the end of it. To try and make out that other people aren't interested in "standards" or that the industry is full of incompetent idiots based on this one overheard briefing is nonsense. He might be an idiot, but there's more to being a good FI than just terminology.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 16:16
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry SAS, to me it is you that is not getting it - I was not so much upset over one misused phrase as the fact that he, and apparently half the instructors here do not think it matters if we teach correctly or not. Also, I did not at any point AFAIK accuse this guy of being a bad instructor (anyway, since when does a helo pilot/instructor navigate differently to a fixed wing one - also FYI I was actually a rotary pilot in a past life!), merely asked what others would have done and then point out his reaction when I made it known that I had spoken to him discretly. Anyway, as most people seem to think this irrelevant and either are missing my point or think I am most in the wrong here for bringing this up I will not be returning to this post.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 16:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Threads on Pprune don't always go the way you think they will!

There are some differences in Heli navigation, not in how we do it, but there are obvious changes in things like looking for off airfield landing sites. I don't know many fixed wing pilots who use OS maps for example! (I too am a heli pilot.)

You did the right thing in talking to him, but it's your subsequent points that I have the issue with. I (and I know Bose is too) am very concerned with the standard of teaching that goes on and I do agree that this bloke could be a problem, but I just don't think it's good enough to have a go at someone or draw conclusions about our industry in general from one bit of phraseology.

Yes, it's not a usual thing to say, but it isn't technically incorrect either. A knot is of course 1 nautical mile per hour, but it's hardly crime of the century to mix up the terms.

It's also unsurprising that you got a slightly odd reaction from him. Some random bloke wanders up and tells you that you're doing something that is very minor albeit wrong, is bound to put you on the back foot.

I've had people try and do that to me (they were actually wrong, not I) and they got sent away with a flea in their ear for 1) Being wrong themselves. 2) Being a pain in the ar*e.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 18:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hongkong
Posts: 202
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I'm pleased that after two pages this has been sorted.

In future I'll just go ahead and use miles when I actually mean miles per hour, metres when I really mean metres per second. Feet in runway distance to go terms when I meant metres. Should I need to go-around on a missed approach I shall declare 'overshooting' and disregard what ATC think of that. I shall refer to oktas when the metar is talking about sky partially obscured and we'll see just how long it takes the rest of the crew the take me to task for talking b. Since some of these are non safety related I expect I'll see another two pages of debate as to whether they're relevant to the topic.

But you guys are at the cutting edge of teaching the future to fly-so that's all right then. And all because some poor unfortunate thought to ask how best to tackle a tricky problem of correcting poor (yes poor) instructing technique.


Sod knots per hour, why not call them apples-it makes about as much sense.

s
Sygyzy is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 19:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know I just told my dog to '****down'. As the words came out of my mouth I thought she would take a dump on the carpet, fortunately she realised it was a slip of the tongue and sat down in stead and stuck her paw out for a treat and thats just a Yorkie pup........

A slip of the tongue hardly makes a bad Instructor, personally if I had done the same and Foxmouth had come and foisted his opinion on me, I would probably have given him a flea in his ear as well.

We are all human and sometimes we make mistakes. It is not our job to be all self righteous and act as the training police when we here a slip up. We are all professionals and a little bit of camaraderie should not go amiss.......

And I will say again for the last time..... He who is without sin cast the first stone.
S-Works is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2010, 19:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As this slip of the tounge was during a ground briefing, I would think it was a simple matter of a bloke not multi-tasking well. Quite probably he was trying to write one thing on the board while saying something else, and had a brain fart.
RTN11 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 01:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Emirates Living - The Meadows
Age: 79
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Are you really sure you meant X?

I would ask him about it phrased as a question.

Bloggs please forgive my professional curiosity and lack of knowledge but I was thinking of taking up some of this rotary black magic stuff that you do.

I am about to purchase the Wagenthingy book but wondered if there were any other substantial differences say in say aerodynamics or navigation apart from the obvious......I couldn't help but over hear that you said X to a student the other day is the phraesology different in rototary parlance or did I misunderstand what you were saying as in fixed wing it is alwasy said in way Y...

Would you recommend that book and would you like a coffee/beer/smoke.......

job done
Vortex Thing is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 07:50
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Alternatively you could use the scottish advanced CRM method.

"oi ya fud, whit ****e were ya telling that poor bastard, knots per hour ya knob, WTF, you need a word with yourself."

If you get any lip back just kick him in the chugs (as patented by SAS)

Don't worry most of these rotary instructors are skinny wee runts so you should be able to take him.

mad_jock is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 08:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N.YORKSHIRE
Posts: 889
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
MJ. In recognition of your last post you have been awarded the title of
HONORARY YORKSHIREMAN.
Flyingmac is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 10:15
  #31 (permalink)  
JTN
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England and Central Europe
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foxmoth

Any chance he did it deliberately, as a test of the student's understanding? And was hoping against hope for "what the hell are you talking about?" in response, from his post-solo nav student?

Just a thought...
JTN is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 12:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Timbuktoo
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't be silly JTN, as bose-x and RTN 11 have decreed it was a slip of the tongue, no doubt due to there superior powers of knowledge and/or telepathy, it can't possibly have been as you suggest.
BabyBear is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 13:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't be silly JTN, as bose-x and RTN 11 have decreed it was a slip of the tongue, no doubt due to there superior powers of knowledge and/or telepathy, it can't possibly have been as you suggest.
I think if you bothered to actually engage your brain before your mouth/fingers you would see that we were trying to offer an alternative view rather than succumb to the lynch mob......
S-Works is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 13:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Timbuktoo
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bose-x, don't try and backtrack now you clearly inferred it WAS a slip of the tongue, if indeed it was then it must have been 2 consecutive slips of the tongue, which is possible, but less likely.

Someone posted giving an overview of a situation and asking for an opinion, simple really, until you try to take control in questioning what actually was witnessed by the OP in stating it was a slip of the tongue, despite it looking highly unlikely.

If, as you say, it is merely offering an alternative view then your method of doing so makes it difficult to recognise it as such and looks more like you were having a right dig with a heavy dose of sarcasm thrown in. Hardly a professional, or mature, approach to offering an alternative view to a fellow instructor, yet you attack the OP for being 'petty'
BabyBear is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 14:16
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: abroad
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I said the exact same think the other day, I was giving a nav brief and asking the student the same type of questions in a few different scenarios. I was caught up in the moment or got distracted, I can't remember and it slipped out, I did however correct myself and all was forgotten.

These things happen, you can be thrown off track by a distraction, such as someone putting there head around the corner of the briefing room or a million other things.

Leave the poor guy alone, there's much worse things to worry about.
FREQUENTFLYER1234 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 17:28
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does a Yorkshireman know what a fud is?

I'm off home to hang out the shopping, it's windy and it'll be dry soon.
Dan the weegie is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 18:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 637
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
How about from a student's perspective? I would find it rather odd that my instructor didn't apparently know something as simple as his units. Wouldn't inspire confidence...

And where I work, mad jock's method of correction is the most widely used, best understood and successful system!
Blues&twos is online now  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 19:05
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eire/HK
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its going to take a long time for a heli student to fly anything that goes 145 Knots. So there is lots of time for Him or Her to be corrected.
B200Drvr is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 21:46
  #39 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even helicopter pilots experience tailwinds from time to time!!
DFC is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 08:23
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oooh! Babybear, want to make a fight of it with me then? Bring it on!!

There is no backtracking going on. I merely observed that I would have seen this as a slip of the tongue and not a reason to go and stick my nose on another instructor or start an internet forum lynch mob.

I assume you have never made a mistake a slip of the tongue or otherwise, the same as foxmoth which entitles you to join him as judge jury and executioner?

See if you can read a solid dose of sarcasm into that......
S-Works is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.