SIM check and training session done by the same instructor/examiner...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: near an airport
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SIM check and training session done by the same instructor/examiner...
Just wondering what the regulations in your country (Europe only) are: Say you are scheduled for an LPC which includes a Training Session and a Check Session in the flight simulator. Can both sessions be done by the same person, i.e. the examiner?
JAR-FCL 1.030 (d) prohibits such practice but authorities can make exemptions. How is your CAA handling this case?
JAR-FCL 1.030 (d) prohibits such practice but authorities can make exemptions. How is your CAA handling this case?
JAR-FCL 1.030 (d) prohibits such practice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: near an airport
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting point
Good point! I never looked at it this way! I am not a native English speaker so...Would someone else comment on this case maybe?
What makes it also kinda strange to understand to not allow such trainings by the examiner is this: What if you do the training e.g. two weeks before the check, then it would basically be allowed...What is the minimum time frame which has to pass to allow training / checking by the same person?
What makes it also kinda strange to understand to not allow such trainings by the examiner is this: What if you do the training e.g. two weeks before the check, then it would basically be allowed...What is the minimum time frame which has to pass to allow training / checking by the same person?
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Canada, under normal circumstances, the examiner cannot have had anything to do with the students training (save for other check rides). However,it can be done where the ACP (Approved Check Pilot) applies for a "One-Time Exemption" from Transport Canada with sufficient notice (5 Business Days in non-emergency situations) with a basic reason why a second ACP holder cannot conduct the ride.