Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Requirements to be CFI??

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Requirements to be CFI??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Feb 2010, 18:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barcelona
Age: 41
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Requirements to be CFI??

Hello all - was hoping some experienced bods could help out with a question.

Are there any minima required by the authority in order to hold the position of Chief Flying Instructor within an FTO?? I know you must meet and pass certain criteria laid down in order to be an examiner, but are there the same requirements in order to be the CFI of an organisation???

Many thanks in advance
The Mixmaster is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 16:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From JAR-FCL 1.055
CHIEF FLYING INSTRUCTOR (CFI)
15 The CFI shall be responsible for the supervision of flight and synthetic flight instructors and for the standardisation of all flight instruction and synthetic flight instruction. The CFI shall:
(a) hold the highest professional pilot licence related to the flying training courses conducted;
(b) hold the rating(s) related to the flying training courses conducted;
(c) hold a flight instructor rating for at least one of the types of aeroplane used on the course; and
(d) have completed 1 000 hours pilot-in-command flight time of which a minimum of 500 hours shall be on flying instructional duties related to the flying courses conducted of which 200 hours may be instrument ground time.
Note this is for a FTO; not a Registered Facility for PPL training! There is no requirement for a CFI at a RF.
Whopity is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2010, 17:38
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barcelona
Age: 41
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah Whopity that's great, many thanks for the info. You can probably guess my next question!! When does a RF become an FTO in the eyes of an aviation authority?? Many thanks again
The Mixmaster is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2010, 08:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Normally an RF would not become an FTO. An FTO is required for professional training such as FIC, CPL, IR, and for ME Class and Type ratings. In the helicopter World, its a little more complicated, as even a second Type on a PPL requires training to be at a TRTO. (A classic sledgehammer to crack a nut!)

It becomes an FTO when it applies to do so and approval is granted. The granting of the approval requires that all requirements of the approval are met including staffing.
Whopity is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2010, 17:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An idle question as an aside. Does a TRTO need any further approval to teach for the PPL?
S-Works is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2010, 20:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A TRTO may only train licence holders, so it cannot train for a PPL. The original concept of a TRTO was to train for MP Type Ratings.

Type ratings for SPH can be conducted at a FTO however for some reason they became TRTOs meaning that they also have to be a Registered Facility if they want to train PPL students.

JAR-FCL 1.125 and 2.125 An applicant for a PPL shall complete at a FTO or an accepted Registered Facility the requirements in accordance with...

Perhaps the daftest thing is that a Registered Facility can train a PPL(H) on a R44, or a R22 but it has to be a TRTO to convert the pilot to the other Type once they are qualified!
Whopity is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2010, 19:53
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barcelona
Age: 41
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks again Whopity...much appreciated! So much bloody legislation...time to dust off JAR FCL/EU OPS!!
The Mixmaster is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 16:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The meaning of JAR-FCL is quite clear, which is more than can be said for the UK CAA's 'decision' making in this area.

The default position is the FTO, which can teach any course, including MP type ratings, for which they can meet the approval criteria. If an organisation wishes to teach only licence holdes for type ratings and associated instructor qualifications they become a TRTO and if they wish to teach only for the PPL they become a Registered Facility.

There has never been a satisfactory, let alone a good reason to require organisations to hold both FTO and TRTO approval and, in some cases, to be Registered Facilities as well!
BillieBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.