Use of FTD for logging pilot time
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Use of FTD for logging pilot time
Flight Training devices can be used, as can simulators, for certain purposes in the US. My question is, can such time be logged as pilot time (as well as the obvious simulator, simulated instrument, approaches etc.).
I had a student who had 50 hours on a Flight Training Device (old one, non motion, non visual) and counted those hours toward the required flight time for her commercial (as PIC). It was accepted, but should it have been?
I had a student who had 50 hours on a Flight Training Device (old one, non motion, non visual) and counted those hours toward the required flight time for her commercial (as PIC). It was accepted, but should it have been?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that's a big no-no.
it can only be counted towards "instruction/dual recieved" granted an instructor was present at each session.
did the examiner even look at his/her logbook?
it can only be counted towards "instruction/dual recieved" granted an instructor was present at each session.
did the examiner even look at his/her logbook?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, according to her a DPE did approve it. I have trouble even believing that Dual time can be logged. That means that an hour in the box equals an hour in an airplane? Log it as simulated, OK, but airplane time that allows for a certificate to be granted? Doesn't seem right to me. Does that mean I can add the time I spend in the 737 simulator to my grand total hours? Does everyone do this?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I forget when, but they "modified" the definition of "simulator" and split it into sim/ftd/pcatd (a further thread on 61 vs. 141)...to discourage someone jumping into an AST-300, trimming it for cruise, and then going grocery shopping for a few hours and logging it as "flight time."
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Europe, the time logged in a full flight simulator doing type rating, lpc and opc can be credited against the 1500 hours required for an ATPL issue.
It can not be credited against any of the other requirements - P1, Multi Pilot time, Night etc.
It is logged as and referred to as Simulator Time.
Similarly, FNPT time can be credited against the appropriate part of training requirements of the CPL course and of course the IR training course can be mostly FNPT time.
However, if you tell me that you have xxx hours total, yyy hours P1 and zzz hours IFR and uuu hours night then I expect all those to be in an aircraft.
The fact that an Authority issed a rating, licence or certificate based on the combination of P1 time (in an aircraft) and time in a sim, does not change the actual amount of P1 time that the person actually has.
So if the Authority wish to issue a certificate to a pilot based on a combination of aircraft and simulator time then they can - but the logbook time should still reflect the true experience situation.
It can not be credited against any of the other requirements - P1, Multi Pilot time, Night etc.
It is logged as and referred to as Simulator Time.
Similarly, FNPT time can be credited against the appropriate part of training requirements of the CPL course and of course the IR training course can be mostly FNPT time.
However, if you tell me that you have xxx hours total, yyy hours P1 and zzz hours IFR and uuu hours night then I expect all those to be in an aircraft.
The fact that an Authority issed a rating, licence or certificate based on the combination of P1 time (in an aircraft) and time in a sim, does not change the actual amount of P1 time that the person actually has.
So if the Authority wish to issue a certificate to a pilot based on a combination of aircraft and simulator time then they can - but the logbook time should still reflect the true experience situation.
