Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Landing and flaps.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2007, 18:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Course your not doing anything wrong but you are disgreeing with some of the people on here that believe everything they do and say is the only way to fly an aircraft. Still it keeps me reminded why I never want to get back into PPL flying training again
llanfairpg is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 20:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 771
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Initially teaching landings with F2 in a PA28 gives slightly more time to learn the correct hold-off picture and techniques so studes seem to learn faster as a result; it's then an easy step to teach full flap landings. I fail to understand what's wrong with doing this provided that the correct technique is used and that full flap landings are understood as the norm. - can someone enlighten me?

As far as the rest of this goes ... we're trying to teach judgement as well as simple motor skills and how to follow the book; judgement requires knowledge. Whenever possible we're also teaching generic skills, rather than PA28 (or whatever) skills.
Plainly the stude needs to understand that they only have a chance of achieving the POH performance if they use the POH techniques but they also need to know when they might want to deviate from the POH. The effect of flap on roll control is info that they may need in some types (speaking as someone who came to grief many years ago because of this ). They also need to understand inertia and the risks of being fast/slow, or of strong gusts.

BTW, if anybody here hasn't read "think like a bird" yet I strongly recommend that you put it on your Xmas list. It's a great read, especially the parts about short landings!

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 09:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: strayia
Age: 53
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
watch the old 182Q/T with a full flap approach (*30Deg) if you have to go around with less than 1/2 tanks, (i.e low weight), if you have trimmed her for approach (as ya do), she'll try and point the nose to heaven on an upwind full power go around and it requires more than a fair physical push to keep the nose down.


Which is in accordance with only using 2/3 flap, it's still a physical push, but a little less mike tyson if you get my drift
cobber_digger_buddy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 11:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was at Coventry one day on finals when I noticed a smashed up C150 short of the threshold. The pilot had just attempted a full flap GA, they took him away in a body bag. He was on a qualifying cross country from Booker.

Teaching GAs is more important than landings but how many instructors place suitable emphasis on this aspect of 12 & 13. I bet if this pilot had been using 20 degree of flap he would be here today.

The wide range of PPL ability coupled with some of the awful standards of PPL training I have witnessed(in 12 flying schools) lead me to belive that the safest option is always the best. I understand why pilots argue for the use of full flap, I use it myself but I would not teach full flap landings as standard in a C150, not that there are that many around anyway!!!!
llanfairpg is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 14:34
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 42
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi

I did my initial training in the mighty PA-28 at Biggin, long runway and so I did most of my early approaches with a flap 2 setting, I felt quite comfortable with this, however I did ask why we didn't train using full flap, the answer I got was something that the last poster eluded to, the fact that most students, in the event of a go-around could forget about the drag flap and end up struggling, especially on a hot day ( I know we don't really get many of them) even in a clean config they tend to climb like a brick and they could run into trouble.

I also agree that perhaps more time should be spent practising Go-Arounds, I got plenty during training, but thats because Biggin tended to be busy with students on the weekend, some of whome forgot to mention that they had finnished their circuits and would, in fact, be landing, slamming on the anchores and then using the whole length to taxi at a fast walking pace...
antic81 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 16:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full flap GA on a C150 is totally different to that on a Pa28 or even a C152, Old 150s (which I learnt on and still did full flap landings) were a real handful - but you were taught to deal with it and IMHO this is how it should be rather than dumbing down the students.
foxmoth is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 17:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats were we differ you see I would not send a PPL to Coventry to land on the Tarmac(in those days) on a cross country using full flap in a C150. I would feel safer briefing him to use 30 in that situation.(strange airfiled perhaps a touch nervous) I quite agree with full flap in every other a/c that has been mentioned.

I think Cessna must have agreed with me to some extent!
llanfairpg is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 02:11
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Cessna must have agreed with me to some extent!
Probably more to do with US liability law than flying technique!
foxmoth is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 13:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same difference!
llanfairpg is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 17:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunny Sussex
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point is not whether you think that landing with 2/3 or full flap is the answer. The point is if that you're working for a flying school (or airline!) you all have to be singing off the same song sheet as instructors or trainers.

My personal opinion is that teaching folk to land with 2/3 flap is not the answer, for all sorts of reasons already set out in previous posts. However, unless I persuade the Boss to change policy, I have to toe the party line. Or start my own flying school.
Fredairstair is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2007, 22:40
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Or start my own flying school.
Ah! I take it, then, that you have as a prerequisite, a large fortune from which to make a small fortune.

Cheers,
TheOddOne
TheOddOne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.