Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Cougar - any comments?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th November 2007 | 10:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 899
Likes: 42
From: Slowly decaying (disgracefully)
Cougar - any comments?

I'm probably going to be ferrying a Cougar tomorrow and would welcome any comments as I haven't flown one before. It seems to have a good POH but it would still be useful to know of any particular foibles.

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Reply
Old 15th November 2007 | 14:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: UK
Had a couple of the starter buttons fail on me, and they fail in the on position, so the starter remains engaged until it burns out. If this happens in flight i think you have no choice but to shutdown the affected engine. I recall the fuses being flush fitted, so you can't pull the fuse on the affected starter, which means it will operate continously with the master on!
Single engine performance is pretty much the same as all other light 4 seater twins, basically you won't climb with any drag and any climb you do get is pretty poor. If you put 2 average size folks up front and full tanks you will be at MTOM, so if you carry anyone in the back seats you need to trade fuel.
I felt it was better than a lot of aircraft in crosswinds, hence why the CAA amended the POH from a 15kt to a 25kt crosswind limit.
Hope this helps.
HN1708 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th November 2007 | 17:19
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 899
Likes: 42
From: Slowly decaying (disgracefully)
Thanks!
The battery was dead so it had to be postponed :-(

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Reply
Old 16th November 2007 | 17:35
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
I remember it as being a very capable performer, bearing in mind the 160hp(?) engines.

I did my Night 1179 in 198X from AAA-BBB-AAA with 4 males on board. The single engine performance was still 200-300 fpm on the go-around. Now clearly we did not carry full fuel, but retrospectively I suspect that a load and balance calculation would have made us illegal!

Sittin gin the back while the others did their 1179 bits was 'interesting'

Overall, I thought of it as a very benign handling and capable aircraft.
TopBunk is offline  
Reply
Old 18th November 2007 | 07:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Grand Com f'Ort
Thumbs down Caution

First, I would caution most severely against flying practically any aircraft without proper training; accidents often result. A real shame to break an aeoplane or lose your life so needlessly, perhaps.

Second, TopBunk is trying to lead us badly astray with:
The single engine performance was still 200-300 fpm on the go-around
This is almost certainly a result of the instructor setting a hopelessly high simulated zero thrust on the 'inoperative' engine; at MTOW, the typical flying school Cougar will struggle to go up at all.

But what should we expect from one who acknowledges:
retrospectively I suspect that a load and balance calculation would have made us illegal
The time to establish that, was prior to the flight, which you should well have known, if at 1179 stage.

Certainly, if you fly any piston twin without proper training, you are most unlikely to be able to handle an engine failure near the ground and fly the aircraft accurately at blue line speed whilst doing the drills.
Kit d'Rection KG is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.