Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Trial Lesson (Non-Microlight) - PPL Instructor

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Trial Lesson (Non-Microlight) - PPL Instructor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th November 2007 | 17:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Walmington on Sea
The CAA specify that a "Trial Lesson" should include some form of basic instruction in flying, and may not be just a jolly. Obviously open to interpretation. However I always treat it as an air experience flight (AirEx 3), brief accordingly and allow the student to fly the aircraft as much as they want.

Flying instruction is aerial work, and provided all the obvious legal caveats are covered, it is perfectly legal for persons to be carried in the back of a 4-seater during an instructional flight. I personally only do this on a trial flight, as the person in the back most likely has a financial interest if the student decides to complete a PPL.

XO
Ex Oggie is offline  
Reply
Old 16th November 2007 | 19:24
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 12
From: UK
It would be helpful if someone with an official perspective could answer with authority. The answer at the Instructor Seminar was unequivocal - it's Public Transport.
The CAA have provided an Answer in their latest PR Campaign

I have been offered a flight as a passenger during a trial lesson. Is this legal?
There is nothing in law to prevent the carriage of non-paying passengers on an instructional flight, apart, of course, from solo flights by a student pilot. If the only payment made is for carriage of the trainee pilot under instruction, the flight is classed as aerial work, and no AOC is needed. However, if any passenger has paid to be carried, the flight is classed as public transport, and is illegal unless the operator holds an AOC.
The last sentence is not strictly correct, because if they held an AOC, the Instruction could not be conducted legally!

Last edited by Whopity; 17th November 2007 at 07:31.
Whopity is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2007 | 17:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: UK
I would have thought 'Public Transport' should involve going from A to B. As most Trial Lessons go from A to erm... A, it seems a bit much to call it Transport. How many people use Transport For London to take the Circle Line from Embankment to Embankment (unless they just fall asleep) ?
FlyingGasMain is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2007 | 13:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
From: UK
I would have thought 'Public Transport' should involve going from A to B.
It includes the like of aerial surveys and photography and pleasure flights, that generally go from A to A.

'Public transport' doesn't mean 'passenger to somewhere else transport'
A Very Civil Pilot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.