Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Examiner recency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 11:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downwind of a smelly passenger
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Examiner recency

Hello gang, I have a question regarding rules if any pertaining to exminers on their recency of experience on aircraft for the purpose of skll tests. Some examiners on the JAA system have been known to do tests on certain machines without recent flight experience and I believe this to be a massive safety issue.

Any thoughts please
funfinn2000 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 17:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except in some very specific circumstances an examiner must be qualified (and current) to fly as pic of any a/c in which (s)he is examining as well as being current as an examiner. For example, to legally examine in a Multiengine piston, you will have taken a (MEP) LPC within the last 15 months. So the examiner will be as current as any 'normal' pilot on the class or type.
WD40 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 18:38
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downwind of a smelly passenger
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
what about if you hav'nt flown a certain type of machine for 3 months and then you examine a pilot who is sitting his ppl and could have more recent experience than the examiner. I think that's a crazy. I know if the FAA system you need to have the 90 day experience in order to act as PIC with PAX but in a skills test the student is the PIC. I am just thinking out loud here
funfinn2000 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 18:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it's that crazy. If a PPL candidate flew a practice flight the day before or the morning of a test (sensible thing!) then he probably would be more current than the examiner but bear in mind that the examiner must be 'officially current' (well spotted on the 90 day rule) and examiners have a lot more experience than the candidates.

(BTW on test, in single pilot a/c, the examiner is actually in command - candidate is P1s if they pass and Pu/t if not).

Speaking for myself, if there's any doubt about currency or familiarity with the a/c, I'll go up in it beforehand.
WD40 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 19:04
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downwind of a smelly passenger
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Ok thanks for that, I am actually talking about a complex machine i.e a light helicopter that would require a ceratain amount of respect
funfinn2000 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 19:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Oops sorry - assumed you were talking fixed wing!
With my 2 hours experience on rotary I'm hardly qualified to comment but I entirely see your point.
WD40 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 19:10
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Downwind of a smelly passenger
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
very serious **** innit
funfinn2000 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.