Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Instructing hours limit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Sep 1999, 23:39
  #21 (permalink)  
BEagle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

HFD - yes, technically you are right. But, bear in mind that the idea is to have a simple system which reduces your off-track error to a value which allows you to recognise your original planned track visually. Showed a student the technique today (pretty calm winds admittedly) - when we turned back on to the original heading we were within a gnat's of track and were then able to refine our track exactly be reference to ground features. We even got to the turning point within 5 sec of the revised ETA!! If you were to carry out a full analysis of errors in the SCA technique at light aircraft speeds, you'd probably find greater sources of error in distance estimates, pitot-static and DI instruments, rudder trim etc than would result from not recalculating (60/GSmiles per minute) on each and every leg. SCA is a KISS technique rather than a precise navigation technique. But it's simple for students and it's certainly good enough for practical applications!!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.