Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Light twin with good SE performance

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Light twin with good SE performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th January 2002 | 06:22
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Middle East
Post

Zeke. .Thanks for the info, we are looking at an aircraft with Aircon, and we are considering a turboprop, its just the running costs that are against the torbo prop, and I'm not sure what the smallest turbprops are, were looking at an instrument /commercial trainer. It souns that the Beech Baron 56TC as suggested by A and C may be worth looking into.. .Thanks everyone
TSevs is offline  
Old 29th January 2002 | 12:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

A light twin is just that ... light on power twin engine aircraft. If you need two engines to produce adequate performance, then when one quits, there is not much going in your favour. You will have less than half of your normal horsepower available to you. Add to that passengers, fuel and 40C temperatures .... not a very encouraging scenario. Remember the Piper Navajo off Long Island Sound that could not maintain level flight on one donk and had to ditch near JFK? I have flown C of A airtests where the aircraft would barely meet the single . .engine climb criteria. The advice I gave to students after they passed their multi rating was that in the event of an engine failure after take-off, close the throttle on the other engine and make an EFATO. Chances are you'll walk away from it.

refplus20 is offline  
Old 30th January 2002 | 06:03
  #23 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 6
From: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Post

Q. Why do light twins have two engines?

A. Because they need both of them.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 30th January 2002 | 07:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
Post

Well, Tinstaafl:

Some years ago I flew a Turbo Commander 690B for a local company, now there was one light twin that sure did perform, even on one engine.

But you are right, to really perform the damn thing did need both of them. <img src="wink.gif" border="0"> <img src="wink.gif" border="0"> <img src="wink.gif" border="0">

.................. . The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.