Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

MICROLIGHTS DOWN THE THAMES?

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

MICROLIGHTS DOWN THE THAMES?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 1999, 21:42
  #1 (permalink)  
SKYYACHT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow MICROLIGHTS DOWN THE THAMES?

As a responsible pilot, who also happens to work within the training arm of a major air carrier, I was somewhat suprised to see on Carlton TV on Sunday that two "Intrepid Birdmen" had bravely flown a Microlight flexwing aircraft under 23 of the bridges over the River Thames from Kew. Carlton TV were obviously in collusion with the perpetrators as the event was filmed wih their knowledge. The report was that the so-called Pilot and his passenger had performed this stunt as a way of joining the dangerous sports club!

Bearing in mind the parlous state of GA in the UK today, with airfield closures and restrictions of airspace by the state I think that adverse publicity caused by these individuals, who recklessly flew their aircraft within controlled airspace, and at a height that grossly infringes the low flight rules deserve to be dealt with by the full might of the enforcement branch. I dont know about other fliers out there, but I dont wish to see even more restrictions on my flying activities as a result of selfish and thoughtless acts of someone who certainly is undeserving of the title of Pilot.

Tailwinds......

------------------
 
Old 10th Aug 1999, 02:13
  #2 (permalink)  
capt beeky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Assuming you have all the facts - I agree.
Did 'Cash And Aggravation' know about it/give an exemption. With enough good planning they will let you break most of the rules provided its safe and well thought out. Unlikely I would have thought for what you have described.
 
Old 10th Aug 1999, 21:10
  #3 (permalink)  
SKYYACHT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Well, I guess that as the news report stated that the CAA had already requested copies of the film for their investigation, I canonly assume that they had no exemption.....Wonder if they will let me buzz the Millenium Dome?

Tailwinds

 
Old 13th Aug 1999, 22:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Meeb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

Microlighting still seems to be the domain of cowboys I am afraid. I used to watch in dismay at these 'things' fly in and out of cloud (you seen the instruments on these things - or lack of I should say) and even at night, landing on an unlit strip etc.
 
Old 13th Aug 1999, 23:07
  #5 (permalink)  
PA38
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Well I can't condone the act, but deep down there is a little bit of us all that would love to do it!!!!!

 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.