Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

FTL and instructing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2001 | 20:57
  #1 (permalink)  
muppet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question FTL and instructing

I have just started work with a turbo prop operator, and have been told I cannot continue to instruct on my days off as this will contravine flight time limitation rules, unless I instruct for free. Is this the case? Can a couple of trial lessons really matter? Do other line pilots instruct on their days off?
 
Old 13th May 2001 | 21:10
  #2 (permalink)  
muppet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow

I have just read the thread started by 737 NG First Officer. mmmmmmmmm !

Any more thoughts anyone?
Perhaps I should go back to hang gliding.

What about gliding, gliding, would that count against FTL ?
 
Old 13th May 2001 | 22:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Noggin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Paid flight instruction is aerial work and that counts toward your FTL. Private flights are like driving the car and don't count.
 
Old 14th May 2001 | 12:29
  #4 (permalink)  
babble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

According to a previous thread, PFA coaches and assistant coaches can receive £25 per flight "expenses" without it being considered aerial work - hence a PPL holder can be a coach. This has (according to the PFA) been agreed to by the CAA.

With this precedent having been set, maybe part time flying instructors could also receive £25 per flight "expenses" without it being considered aerial work and hence not counting for FTL. This would have the added bonus that the "expenses" would not be remuneration and thus would not be taxable. It is of course a grey area and CAA clarification would be needed.

The whole thing is bureaucracy gone mad anyway. The purpose of an FTL scheme is to prevent undue fatigue. I would like somebody to explain why an hour of paid insructing on a day off is more fatiguing than an hour of unpaid instructing.
 
Old 14th May 2001 | 13:23
  #5 (permalink)  
Noggin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

It may have been agreed by the CAA however, the law has not been changed and Article 130 quite clearly defines remunerated flying as Aerial Work. The said coaches may have an Exemption to the ANO to accept remuneration however, do they hold an exemption that changes the definition of Aerial Work?
 
Old 14th May 2001 | 16:24
  #6 (permalink)  
muppet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Thanks for the advice.

Sounds like Noggin knows his onions.
 
Old 14th May 2001 | 19:00
  #7 (permalink)  
babble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Noggin,
As far as I am aware the PFA coaches have not got an ANO exemption to receive remuneration, which is why they have to call the money they get "expenses".

The point relevent to this thread however is could an instructor give his services to a flying club or group for free, but still claim expenses? For example could the club re-imburse the cost of attending an instructor seminar without it being counted as remuneration (and therefore aerial work)?

The answer to this would be of interest to me.
 
Old 14th May 2001 | 23:03
  #8 (permalink)  
Noggin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The way to determine if a flight is for hire or reward is to ask the question, if the flight did not take place, will the payment still be made?

In the cases of expenses, if you drive to the airfield and you get rained off, you have still incurred the expense of going there so it has nothing to do with the flight. Similarly if a club pays your seminar or instructor renewal costs it does not relate to any specific flight.

There are flying clubs where instructors are not paid for instruction and receive travel expenses etc or a daily allowance for being at the club. Provided such expenses are paid regardless of flying, they cannot be regarded as remuneration for the flight.
 
Old 15th May 2001 | 01:06
  #9 (permalink)  
babble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Thanks, that makes sense.

(Noggin does know his onions)
 
Old 15th May 2001 | 04:46
  #10 (permalink)  
David M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

In Australia with a Commercial or higher licence flight time limitations are effected by any private flying you do and consequently may make your next flight both illegal and not covered by insurance (same as not holding a licence at all). See Civil Aviation Orders Section 48.0.1.3

------------------
Professionalism is an attitude winners have that losers never aquire, think professional, look professional, act professional.
(If you think training is expensive, try putting a price on ignorance.)
 
Old 18th May 2001 | 20:13
  #11 (permalink)  
Airprox
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Instructing according to CAP 371 is aerial work whether you are payed or not! And thus the hours go towards your total maximum flight time per month or year. It doesn't however effect your duty time.

You are meant to have the AOC holders permission to instruct on your days off. I know lots of people that don't have permission but still instruct.

The rules in CAP 371 are meant to help pilots get rest from commercial type flying. Shame they stop or hinder us using our instructor ratings when we have that sought after airline job.

------------------
AP
 
Old 19th May 2001 | 04:02
  #12 (permalink)  
Luftwaffle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

In Canada all flying you do -- instruction, personal, commercial, commuting -- counts towards duty times and flight duty times. So whether you spend your day off flying up country to visit your mother, or doing a few loops in the practice area, it can still duty you out. If you have non-flying duties as well, your duty day still starts when you first report for duty, and ends when you stop the engine at the end of the final flight.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.