Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Hours for removal of FI restriction & revalidation

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Hours for removal of FI restriction & revalidation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2004, 23:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Africa
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hours for removal of FI restriction & revalidation

Does anyone have any experience of using instructional hours flown in aircraft other than SEP to have restrictions removed/ meet 3 year/100 hour requirement etc? By other aircraft I mean gliders, SLA's, 3 axis microlights or anything else not covered by JAR-FCL1.005 (a)(5).
Baron Von Mildred is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2004, 08:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the privileges of a FI(R) do not extend beyond SEP the answer should be obvious.

If an aircraft is not recognised by JAR-FCL 1.005 then it would not count towards a JAR-FCL 1 qualification. See AIC 3/2004 para 2.
StrateandLevel is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2004, 23:23
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Africa
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIC 3/2004

The previledges of an FI or FI(R) do extend beyond SEP as the same AIC affirms. The AIC does say that such experience can't count toward the SEP recency req. (presumably), but doesn't explicitly say whether FI recency & upgrades are included in this.
Baron Von Mildred is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2004, 23:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, the AIC merely clarifies that aeroplane instructors may also instruct on Microlights because they are legally aeroplanes. i.e. they fit into the SEP definition. The FI(R) can also instruct on Single Pilot Types.

JAR-FCL 1.005 (5) states that where aeroplanes are referred to in JAR-FCL1 it does not include Microlights. This is what lead to the clarification in the AIC; it had been assumed by some that Microlights were a different Class and therefore needed a separate Microlight Instructor rating. NPPL negotiations resolved this issue however; JAR-FCL 1.005 still prohibits you from counting any hours flown on a Microlight towards any JAA licence or rating unless it specifically says so i.e. the max 10 hours credit towards PPL issue.
StrateandLevel is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2004, 09:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Africa
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, for example could solos supervised on a microlight be counted towards the 25 required for the lifting of a FI restriction? Or hours instructed in SLMG/ Microlight be used to revalidate an FI after 3 years?

AS you say microilights are SEP (or not)?
Baron Von Mildred is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.