Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Comet Documentary

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2002, 00:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comet Documentary

Did anyone watch this?

I was quite keen to see it following last year's Concorde doc.

This was all a bit before my time, so it raises some questions in my mind, foremost of which is that wasn't the ARB in existence then, and if so, what degree of monitoring took place during the Comet test program? Was it considered sufficient to allow DH tps ( no slur intended here ) to test such a radical design without the ARB putting it's own tps on board? Is it really true that every post war DH design suffered an inflight structural failure? And was it true that no major fatigue testing took place until after the second grounding? Is there an ex DH or ARB tp/eng who can shed any light? A fascinating story to be sure, but was it accurate?

MB
Matt Black is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2002, 01:37
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,206
Received 113 Likes on 73 Posts
I didn't see the program so I can't comment specifically.

One needs to keep in mind that design philosophies and processes .. and certification requirements ... are evolving animals.

At the time of the Comet .. structural fatigue wasn't one of the top line concerns .. although it certainly became so after the early hull losses.

The Brits did the honourable thing and let everyone in on their investigation processes and results ... Boeing took the benefits to heart ... with dreadful commercial consequences for the UK industry ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2002, 01:45
  #3 (permalink)  


Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 1997
Location: EU
Posts: 720
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Dont think they (dhavilland) let many in on the cover-up. Especially with the problem they knew about with riveting windows instead of gluestuff.

Also NO fatigue stress tests carried out, and an obvious problem with rotation as 3 incidents showed.

Plus the poor guy Capt Foote, remained on freight fleet until his retirement despite the fact the authorities knew it wasnt his fault.

Typical if u ask me
Hogg is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 09:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,916
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
See 'Aviation History and Nostalgia' forum for many more posts on this subject.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2002, 23:47
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the comments. It is a really fascinating story, and I agree that as design is an evolving animal, it is difficult to predict what shortcomings new technology might have. My concern is that with media reporting having the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, the flight test community is less likely to share its insights with the public, and also any inaccuracies portrayed become lodged in the public psyche as "fact".

BTW, I believe a lot of the Comet problems were the source material behind the book "Cone of Silence" which was later made into a film ( circa 1960 ) if anyone's interested.

Best wishes all

MB
Matt Black is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.