Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Vmcg and flaps configuration

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Vmcg and flaps configuration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2014, 08:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Where the test flights are
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vmcg and flaps configuration

Hello all,

I would be interested to verify with all the experts of the forum if the Minimum Control Speed Ground (Vmcg) changes with Flaps setting.
I would tend to believe that there is no difference or only a very marginal one.
It should depend only upon the max rudder deflection, correct ?
And for Vmcg, sideslip should not be a factor.
All your comments and inputs are appreciated as always.
Thx a lot,
Leo.
leonard17F is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2014, 10:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The following text has been copied directly from the web (to save me typing it). No, flap does not have any influence upon Vmcg, nor can you apply sideslip whilst you're physically on the ground!

Vmcg is defined as the minimum control speed on the ground, with one engine inoperative (critical engine on two engine airplanes), takeoff power on other engine(s), using aerodynamic controls only for directional control.
To maintain directional control with an inoperative engine, the rudder must be deflected to counteract the adverse yaw. The force that can generated by the rudder is dependent upon the size of the rudder, the amount that the rudder can be deflected and the speed of the airflow across the rudder surface.

In the case of an aircraft fitted with engines that can be derated for takeoff, the reduction in thrust will result in a corresponding reduction in the amount of yaw induced should an engine fail. As the rudder size and deflection capability remain constant, the amount of force required to counter that yaw can be generated at a lower airspeed than would be case during a full thrust takeoff. This results in a reduction in Vmcg and the potential for a reduction in V1.
TheChitterneFlyer is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2014, 16:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
With respect to sideslip on the ground, when taking off in a crosswind there will be sideslip (although, obviously, you cannot apply it). A crosswind from the same side as the failed engine will increase the minimum control speed and vice versa. Remember that Vmcg is a specification definition speed that has a maximum crosswind component stipulated (from memory, it used to be 7 kts for BCAR but I think is nil for CS25). The actual minimum speed at which you can control the aircraft may be greater or less than Vmcg according to factors such as crosswind and derated thrust.
LOMCEVAK is offline  
Old 3rd May 2014, 12:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA, Ireland
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some aircraft, the DC-9-30 for example, restrict rudder deflection at certain flap settings.
acebaxter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.