Production Test Pilot Rating
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: perdido en el corazon de la grande babilon
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Production Test Pilot Rating
Hi everybody!
Does any of you know what is the rating required by the JAA regulation for a pilot to undertake post maintenance and acceptance test flights on JAR25 airplanes? FAA regulations provides the "production test pilot rating" but I couldn't find anything about that into the JAR documentation.
Thanks!
Does any of you know what is the rating required by the JAA regulation for a pilot to undertake post maintenance and acceptance test flights on JAR25 airplanes? FAA regulations provides the "production test pilot rating" but I couldn't find anything about that into the JAR documentation.
Thanks!
I don't believe that any such rating exists - such a "rating" is in practice a procedure approved by the national authority / EASA within the company handbook (/ exposition / procedures manual) of either the operating or maintenance company. If you are currently flying for a company, the best thing to do is speak to either whoever is currently flying those tests, or the fleet technical manager - they should know what the local procedures are.
G
G
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Raincoast
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my experience production test flying was carried out by pilots employed by the manufacturer. They were usually ex military or civil qualified test pilots trained by ETPS or USAF or similar institutions.
Post maintenance test flying was sponsored by a company, ie: an airline and they just appoint line drivers with experience/interest/background to do post mtce test flights. No special endorsement or rating required.
Post maintenance test flying was sponsored by a company, ie: an airline and they just appoint line drivers with experience/interest/background to do post mtce test flights. No special endorsement or rating required.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wichita, Kansas, US and A
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I took a Technical Pilot Course at the National Test Pilot School. It is geared for, among others, production test pilots. There were two European JAR-certified guys there, and neither was given a rating or endorsement, just our graduation certificates and a bill. It was a pretty neat course. I hope this helps.
Perhaps we can have some clarification by our French and German brethren?
I believe that a Test Pilot Rating (Class 1 / 2) exists nationally in these countries. As a graduate tp and one of the few practising 'independent' rotary test pilots, it grieves me that in our CAA-regulated part of JARland there is no rotary 'class' rating and that the French/German tp's class rating (if I understand it correctly) is unlikely to find its way into EASA-FCL. So can normally only work in aircraft on which type rated and current, which can add an impossible amount to the quote. Makes one think that, even approaching retirement in a few years, it's worth now getting a FAA Licence.
Hobbyhorse to stable.
Agree with production tp training. I think ETPS is now offering course as well as NTPS.
I believe that a Test Pilot Rating (Class 1 / 2) exists nationally in these countries. As a graduate tp and one of the few practising 'independent' rotary test pilots, it grieves me that in our CAA-regulated part of JARland there is no rotary 'class' rating and that the French/German tp's class rating (if I understand it correctly) is unlikely to find its way into EASA-FCL. So can normally only work in aircraft on which type rated and current, which can add an impossible amount to the quote. Makes one think that, even approaching retirement in a few years, it's worth now getting a FAA Licence.
Hobbyhorse to stable.
Agree with production tp training. I think ETPS is now offering course as well as NTPS.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No More
The Germans HAD tp1 and tp2 ratings. But since the JAA standardization they are now just bragging ratings. A few of my co-workers still have the paper, but in reality, it means little (other than to stroke their immense ego)
Whilst I can certainly see Idle Stop's point about allowing a rotary TP (with some form of class rating) to fly aircraft on which he doesn't hold a type rating for true T&E purposes, I can't quite see how you'd make a generic "production test pilot" rating work: consider for example Airbus, AWH, Diamond, BNG.... Whilst there are certainly similarities to each organisation's production flight test requirements, to create a syllabus and qualification that would encompass everybody's needs would be incredibly expensive and cumbersome. The current approach of an experienced and type-qualified pilot within the company being approved by local procedures agreed with the authority seems to make a lot more sense.
G
G
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
consider for example Airbus, AWH, Diamond, BNG
Fairly normal for a light single manufacturer I think - and a process with a (fairly) good track record.
Out of interest, what training and evaluation do Diamond require? Presumably not TPS?
G
Out of interest, what training and evaluation do Diamond require? Presumably not TPS?
G