Winglets..are they usefull?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ITALY
Age: 74
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Winglets..are they usefull?
What i can recall from my limited knowledge of aerodynamics, wiglets help reduce wing tip vortices and thereby cruise drag. How come Boeing went for winglets on the 747 and BBJs, but not the 777?
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It could be because winglets have disadvantages such as weight, cost, their own drag and increasing wing bending loads. Whether there will be a net benefit by employing them will presumably vary between types as well as the type of sortie they will be used on.
The Hatfield Aerodynamics team (home of the Airbus A300 wing and BAe146) always stood by their statement that “a good wing design doesn’t need winglets”; although some of them subsequently had to accept ‘end plates’.
Moderator
I am of the view that, for small aircraft, there is an element of marketing hype involved.
For big birds, the sail gives an effective increase in span (at some expense in fatigue etc and probably worth around 70 or so percent sail length in terms of span) but has the big advantage of not compromising a lot of very expensive airport gate infrastructure ...
For big birds, the sail gives an effective increase in span (at some expense in fatigue etc and probably worth around 70 or so percent sail length in terms of span) but has the big advantage of not compromising a lot of very expensive airport gate infrastructure ...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: About 1 mile from WOD ndb
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do recall flying SFO-LHR on a BA 744 that was minus its port winglet. Caused me to rub my eyes and walk to the other side -- sure enough, winglet all present and correct. I asked one of the CC and she said, oh no, you must be wrong -- then she looked herself . . .
Wonder how it affected the trim?
Wonder how it affected the trim?
Just another number
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a B747-400 the winglets become cost effective on flights of five hours or more. On shorter flights the cost of carrying the extra weight does not compensate for the fuel efficiency. I believe that JAL operate some 744's without winglets, but with modified wingtips, on their domestic routes.
The 744's with winglets are certified to fly with one winglet missing, but not both missing. Boeing could not justify the certification flying that would have been required for both to be removed, as they felt that it would be unlikely for both winglets to be damaged. The aerodynamics of an aircraft with the winglet removed is different to an aircraft with the modified wingtip.
The 744's with winglets are certified to fly with one winglet missing, but not both missing. Boeing could not justify the certification flying that would have been required for both to be removed, as they felt that it would be unlikely for both winglets to be damaged. The aerodynamics of an aircraft with the winglet removed is different to an aircraft with the modified wingtip.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: warwickshire
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airbus products can also fly with only 1 winglet out of interest.
In terms of the 777, whilst they don't have winglets, the larger, later versions have raked wingtips (as does the 767-400), which have a similar effect to the winglet, with less weight, however they increase the span which can be a problem on some jets (such as the 737 which uses a smaller gate to the widebodies).
I believe the A340 was originally designed without the winglets, though when the IAE superfan was cancelled they had to add the winglets to compensate for the performance.
In terms of the 777, whilst they don't have winglets, the larger, later versions have raked wingtips (as does the 767-400), which have a similar effect to the winglet, with less weight, however they increase the span which can be a problem on some jets (such as the 737 which uses a smaller gate to the widebodies).
I believe the A340 was originally designed without the winglets, though when the IAE superfan was cancelled they had to add the winglets to compensate for the performance.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any aircraft designed to a span limitation can have its max L/D increased by adding winglets; if done intelligently the L/D increase more than pays for the additional wing weight due to the higher bending moments. This was true for the A380, which was designed to an 80m span limit when the optimum span for the aircraft was somewhere around 84m.
Even on an aircraft which is not span limited, winglets can be used with minor wing weight penalty by soaking up some of the 'fat' in the wing strength which is evident once the ultimate static load tests are done; any strength margin over the certification requriements can be cashed in as an aero benefit via winglets. On the A340-300 the winglets were added mainly to improve the low speed performance, but they also cut cruise drag by about 3-4%. Aviation Partners claim around 7% for the BBJ winglets, but they are proportionately twice the height of the A340 winglets.
Some winglet effects are not immediately obvious. One project I worked on gained significant wing limit load relief due to the wing sweep and fact that the aft-positioned winglet pulled the aero centre aftwards at the wingtip which caused the load to shift further inboard at manoeuvre limit due to aeroelastic wing twist. The weight saving more that balanced the lower aero benefit of this smaller winglet. All jolly interesting.
On Glide
Even on an aircraft which is not span limited, winglets can be used with minor wing weight penalty by soaking up some of the 'fat' in the wing strength which is evident once the ultimate static load tests are done; any strength margin over the certification requriements can be cashed in as an aero benefit via winglets. On the A340-300 the winglets were added mainly to improve the low speed performance, but they also cut cruise drag by about 3-4%. Aviation Partners claim around 7% for the BBJ winglets, but they are proportionately twice the height of the A340 winglets.
Some winglet effects are not immediately obvious. One project I worked on gained significant wing limit load relief due to the wing sweep and fact that the aft-positioned winglet pulled the aero centre aftwards at the wingtip which caused the load to shift further inboard at manoeuvre limit due to aeroelastic wing twist. The weight saving more that balanced the lower aero benefit of this smaller winglet. All jolly interesting.
On Glide
A 777 had decades more technology in its modern wing that the 747. They are quite different wings aerodynamically.
Look at the new Boeing 747-8 and 787 wing design. No giant winglets, but their design is much more efficient. More of a slender raked design at the tips.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/index.html
Look at the new Boeing 747-8 and 787 wing design. No giant winglets, but their design is much more efficient. More of a slender raked design at the tips.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/index.html
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some issues with winglets outlined here..
http://airtransportbiz.free.fr/Techn...hewinglet.html
It seems they don't increase the effective span very much.
http://airtransportbiz.free.fr/Techn...hewinglet.html
It seems they don't increase the effective span very much.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Winglets were until recently common on glider designs. The conventional wisdom is that they improve the low speed handling and climbing characteristics, but that the penalty is reduced L/D at higher speeds.
Some recent designs have cranked-up wingtips with complex leading edge changes in the outer third of the the wing. These may or may not have winglets.
Examples at:
http://www.alexander-schleicher.de/englisch/e_main.htm
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/technis...en-1000-e.html
http://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/flug...s_4/index.html
Some recent designs have cranked-up wingtips with complex leading edge changes in the outer third of the the wing. These may or may not have winglets.
Examples at:
http://www.alexander-schleicher.de/englisch/e_main.htm
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/technis...en-1000-e.html
http://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/flug...s_4/index.html
A retrofitted winglet on a 737-800 built without privision weighs 235kg for the pair, but only 170kg if provisioned or installed during production. Price varies hugely with contract.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: warwickshire
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did read somewhere that on the 737, the winglets only start making a benefit on the longer routes (3-4hrs+), as below that, the weight was more of a penalty. Which is interesting with Ryanair running it on all their 30min Ireland-UK hops.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: codsville
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can someone please tell me the technical reasoning behinf the 777 not having winglets. They fly a long way and I want to know why thaey are not used and if anyone thinks that winglets will be fitted to existing 777 in the future, like the A320 which is being tested with winglets. Are the gates/vortex generators really that effective on the 777 stopping the span wise flow.
Originally Posted by booskins
Can someone please tell me the technical reasoning behinf the 777 not having winglets. They fly a long way and I want to know why thaey are not used and if anyone thinks that winglets will be fitted to existing 777 in the future, like the A320 which is being tested with winglets. Are the gates/vortex generators really that effective on the 777 stopping the span wise flow.
All wings have spanwise flow. The idea of winglets is to remove the drag inducing vorticies away from the main wing reducing the downwash effects. You'll note on the ER 777's and on the 767-400ER, a "Raked Wingtip" has been used instead which basically results in the same thing (reducing wingtip vorticies). A raked wingtip means that the wing tip is highly swept.
The 777 wing is quite different to your standard airliner wing. It has a "super critical" wing design and is many years ahead in its efficiency.
So RWT's for the 777, winglets are out!
767-400ER with raked wing tips (RWT's)
777 with RWT's