Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Cessna 150/152 spin modes

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Cessna 150/152 spin modes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2004, 15:58
  #1 (permalink)  

Awesome but Affordable
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kings Cliffe
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Devil Cessna 150/152 spin modes

Having long ceased my instructional career I wonder if this forum could provide some theoretical advice on a spin mode I encountered many years ago in the Cessna 152.
The 152 is to say the least reluctant to spin if the entry is done power off and the accepted technique is to use a low power setting around 1500rpm to give more authority to the rudder and elevator. In experimentation I found that if one entered the spin using this technique and then, once the aircraft stabilised, you applied full power and full in-spin aileron deflection the rotation rate was not dissimilar to a Pitts S1. On then taking recovery action of ailerons neutral and power off the nose rose to a flatter attitude and the rotation rate slowed down a bit in a classic flat spin. Full opposite rudder had no effect until the control wheel was pushed forward against the aerodynamic load on the underside of the elevators in a similar fashion to the Chipmunk. The control wheel had to be much further forward than usual before the spin abruptly stopped after perhaps a further three turns. The height lost per turn seemed to be similar to normal but with the considerable increase in the number of turns the total height loss was considerable.
This was repeated on numerous occasions and even demonstrated to a few of my FIC students who enjoyed spinning and they all were of the opinion that they had never come across anything like it.
The aircraft was well within the CofG envelope but, as is usually the case, close to the MTOM.
Any thought please especially since compliance with BCAR Section K was not assured here.
Thanks,
Trapper 69
G-KEST is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2004, 20:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,166
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Barry,
Mal Beard wrote some notes on this subject a few years ago - its at the bottom of this page:
http://www.ozaeros.com/spin/beard.htm
The 1978 article in Flight International touches upon this characteristic - copy at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ozaero...%20Operations/ (you'll need to register with that yahoo group for access or I can email it to you)
djpil is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2004, 21:23
  #3 (permalink)  

Awesome but Affordable
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kings Cliffe
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Devil

Thanks for the information I would like an emailed copy of that user group item if possible on -
[email protected]
I will look at the other item tomorrow as I am about to have my geriatrics mug of cocoa and slide up to bed now.........!!!
Cheers,
Trapper 69
G-KEST is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.